Farewell, associates. Welcome back assistants

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r1477
Trisha Greenhalgh, Martin McKee
{"title":"Farewell, associates. Welcome back assistants","authors":"Trisha Greenhalgh, Martin McKee","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r1477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 20 November 2024, Wes Streeting, the UK’s Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, commissioned Gillian Leng to undertake an independent review of physician associates and anaesthesia associates. The rationale, in his words, was that “…there are legitimate concerns over transparency for patients, scope of practice and the substituting of doctors. These concerns have been ignored for too long, leading to a toxic debate where physicians feel ignored and [physician associates] feel demoralised.” 1 Leng was asked to consider two main questions. Were these staff roles (as currently deployed in England) safe? Were they clinically effective? Today, less than eight months later, the 134 page Leng Review has been published.2 It draws on academic research from within and beyond the UK, as well as a survey of over 8000 healthcare staff and consultation with additional individuals and groups, including patients and the public. The review makes 18 recommendations, 12 of which relate directly or indirectly to patient safety. Physician associates, the review proposes, should be renamed “physician assistants.” They should be required to wear nationally standardised clothing, lanyards, and badges to distinguish them from doctors. They should not be allowed to see undifferentiated patients, nor should they be permitted to work in primary care until they have at least two years’ …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 20 November 2024, Wes Streeting, the UK’s Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, commissioned Gillian Leng to undertake an independent review of physician associates and anaesthesia associates. The rationale, in his words, was that “…there are legitimate concerns over transparency for patients, scope of practice and the substituting of doctors. These concerns have been ignored for too long, leading to a toxic debate where physicians feel ignored and [physician associates] feel demoralised.” 1 Leng was asked to consider two main questions. Were these staff roles (as currently deployed in England) safe? Were they clinically effective? Today, less than eight months later, the 134 page Leng Review has been published.2 It draws on academic research from within and beyond the UK, as well as a survey of over 8000 healthcare staff and consultation with additional individuals and groups, including patients and the public. The review makes 18 recommendations, 12 of which relate directly or indirectly to patient safety. Physician associates, the review proposes, should be renamed “physician assistants.” They should be required to wear nationally standardised clothing, lanyards, and badges to distinguish them from doctors. They should not be allowed to see undifferentiated patients, nor should they be permitted to work in primary care until they have at least two years’ …
再见,同事。欢迎回来助理
2024年11月20日,英国卫生和社会保健大臣韦斯·斯特里廷(Wes Streeting)委托Gillian Leng对医师助理和麻醉助理进行独立审查。用他的话来说,理由是“……对病人的透明度、执业范围和医生的替代存在合理的担忧。”这些担忧被忽视的时间太长了,导致了一场有害的辩论,医生感到被忽视,[医生同事]感到士气低落。我被要求考虑两个主要问题。这些员工角色(目前部署在英格兰)安全吗?它们在临床上是否有效?今天,不到8个月后,134页的《冷评论》已经出版它借鉴了英国国内外的学术研究,以及对8000多名医护人员的调查,并咨询了其他个人和团体,包括患者和公众。审查提出了18项建议,其中12项直接或间接与患者安全有关。该综述建议,医师助理应更名为“医师助理”。他们应该被要求穿着国家标准的服装,佩戴胸牌,以区别于医生。他们不应该被允许去看未分化的病人,也不应该被允许在初级保健部门工作,直到他们至少有两年的……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信