A Taxonomy to Characterize Stressor Variation in Studies of Physical Resilience and its Illustration in Total Knee Replacement.

Frederick Sieber,Mallak K Alzahrani,Qian-Li Xue,Ravi Varadhan,Thomas Laskow,Charles Brown,Brian Buta,Julius Oni,Fangyu Liu,Jeremy Walston,Karen Bandeen-Roche
{"title":"A Taxonomy to Characterize Stressor Variation in Studies of Physical Resilience and its Illustration in Total Knee Replacement.","authors":"Frederick Sieber,Mallak K Alzahrani,Qian-Li Xue,Ravi Varadhan,Thomas Laskow,Charles Brown,Brian Buta,Julius Oni,Fangyu Liu,Jeremy Walston,Karen Bandeen-Roche","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThis study aimed to develop a conceptual framework and empirical measures to characterize stressor magnitude and type in the context of total knee replacement (TKR) and to investigate their relationship with resilience phenotypes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA sequential elicitation process was used to identify key stressor characteristics, categorized as exogenous or endogenous. Resilience phenotypes were created as (post-surgery - (baseline, or pre-surgery)) changes in four measures of physical function/symptoms selected based on their relevance to TKR outcomes. These measures included: the Short Physical Performance Battery score (SPPB), the Pittsburgh fatigability scale (PFS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary score, and the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) quality of life subscale.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAnalyses revealed few associations between baseline phenotype measurements and stressor characteristics. Several consistent adjusted associations were observed between stressor characteristics and six-month resilience phenotypes. All endogenous measurements analyzed exhibited the expected direction of association with PFS change from baseline to 6 months, indicating higher stress levels predicted a diminished return of vigor post-surgery; intraoperative blood loss exhibited the strongest association. Outpatient vs inpatient procedures were associated with more beneficial change from baseline to 6 months of all resiliency phenotypes; SPPB score recovery exhibited the strongest association. Other individual strong associations were observed, but with less consistency across phenotypic trajectories or stressor characteristics.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe study highlights the importance of considering stressor variation in resilience research. The conceptual framework and empirical measures developed provide a foundation for future investigations into the factors influencing resilience to physical stressors in older adults.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework and empirical measures to characterize stressor magnitude and type in the context of total knee replacement (TKR) and to investigate their relationship with resilience phenotypes. METHODS A sequential elicitation process was used to identify key stressor characteristics, categorized as exogenous or endogenous. Resilience phenotypes were created as (post-surgery - (baseline, or pre-surgery)) changes in four measures of physical function/symptoms selected based on their relevance to TKR outcomes. These measures included: the Short Physical Performance Battery score (SPPB), the Pittsburgh fatigability scale (PFS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component summary score, and the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) quality of life subscale. RESULTS Analyses revealed few associations between baseline phenotype measurements and stressor characteristics. Several consistent adjusted associations were observed between stressor characteristics and six-month resilience phenotypes. All endogenous measurements analyzed exhibited the expected direction of association with PFS change from baseline to 6 months, indicating higher stress levels predicted a diminished return of vigor post-surgery; intraoperative blood loss exhibited the strongest association. Outpatient vs inpatient procedures were associated with more beneficial change from baseline to 6 months of all resiliency phenotypes; SPPB score recovery exhibited the strongest association. Other individual strong associations were observed, but with less consistency across phenotypic trajectories or stressor characteristics. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights the importance of considering stressor variation in resilience research. The conceptual framework and empirical measures developed provide a foundation for future investigations into the factors influencing resilience to physical stressors in older adults.
生理恢复力研究中应激源变化的分类及其在全膝关节置换术中的应用。
本研究旨在建立一个概念框架和经验措施,以表征全膝关节置换术(TKR)背景下的应激源的大小和类型,并研究它们与弹性表型的关系。方法采用顺序激发法识别外源性或内源性应激源的关键特征。恢复力表型是指(术后-(基线或术前))根据与TKR结果的相关性选择的身体功能/症状的四项测量值的变化。这些测量包括:短物理性能电池评分(SPPB),匹兹堡疲劳量表(PFS),短表格36 (SF-36)物理成分总结评分,以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)生活质量亚量表。结果分析显示,基线表型测量值与应激源特征之间几乎没有关联。在应激源特征和六个月恢复力表型之间观察到几个一致的调整关联。从基线到6个月,所有内源性测量结果都显示出与PFS变化相关的预期方向,表明较高的应激水平预示着术后活力的减少;术中出血量表现出最强的相关性。从基线到6个月,门诊治疗与住院治疗相比,所有弹性表型的有益变化更大;SPPB评分恢复的相关性最强。其他个体的强关联也被观察到,但在表型轨迹或应激源特征上的一致性较差。结论本研究强调了在弹性研究中考虑应激源变异的重要性。本文提出的概念框架和实证方法为进一步研究老年人身体应激恢复力的影响因素奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信