Kai Rejeski, Joshua A. Hill, Saurabh Dahiya, Michael D. Jain
{"title":"Noncanonical and mortality-defining toxicities of CAR T cell therapy","authors":"Kai Rejeski, Joshua A. Hill, Saurabh Dahiya, Michael D. Jain","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03813-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is associated with a unique spectrum of toxicities that drive morbidity, mortality and patient quality of life. Previous efforts yielded consensus grading systems for the prototypical immunotoxicities—namely, cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). These grading systems set the stage for severity-based and standardized treatment protocols that have contributed to a reduction in the acute toxicity burden of CAR T cell therapy and have enabled outpatient administration. However, understanding of CAR T cell therapy has since grown to encompass new targets, new diseases and broader patient populations—including long-term survivors. As side effects are better defined and novel toxicities emerge, there is a need to understand their mechanisms and standardize reporting to improve clinical management. Here we review the current state of knowledge for mortality-defining and rare toxicities of CAR T cell therapies, beyond CRS and ICANS. We discuss mechanisms, including on-target injury, cytokine-associated inflammation and dysregulated recovery, and how these mechanisms affect the timing and management of toxicities. Finally, we define key unmet needs and delineate future priorities and research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03813-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is associated with a unique spectrum of toxicities that drive morbidity, mortality and patient quality of life. Previous efforts yielded consensus grading systems for the prototypical immunotoxicities—namely, cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). These grading systems set the stage for severity-based and standardized treatment protocols that have contributed to a reduction in the acute toxicity burden of CAR T cell therapy and have enabled outpatient administration. However, understanding of CAR T cell therapy has since grown to encompass new targets, new diseases and broader patient populations—including long-term survivors. As side effects are better defined and novel toxicities emerge, there is a need to understand their mechanisms and standardize reporting to improve clinical management. Here we review the current state of knowledge for mortality-defining and rare toxicities of CAR T cell therapies, beyond CRS and ICANS. We discuss mechanisms, including on-target injury, cytokine-associated inflammation and dysregulated recovery, and how these mechanisms affect the timing and management of toxicities. Finally, we define key unmet needs and delineate future priorities and research directions.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.