Machine learning improves post-transplantation hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence prediction.

P Jonathan Li, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Shareef Syed, Neil Mehta, Adnan Alseidi, Mohamed A Adam
{"title":"Machine learning improves post-transplantation hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence prediction.","authors":"P Jonathan Li, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Shareef Syed, Neil Mehta, Adnan Alseidi, Mohamed A Adam","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To enhance post-transplantation hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence prediction by evaluating additional novel risk factors and leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the UNOS database, we identified adult HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation (2015-2018) and considered >50 available clinical, radiographic, laboratory/biomarker, and explant pathology variables to predict post-transplantation recurrence free survival. The cohort was split 70:30 into training and test datasets. Recursive feature elimination was employed to select an optimal number of variables for each candidate ML model. Final model performance was compared to clinically used tools with the test dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3106 patients identified, 7.2% developed post-transplantation HCC recurrence. The Gradient Boosting Survival algorithm performed best (C-index 0.73) and included 7 variables: explant tumor burden score (TBS), AFP at transplantation, maximum pre-transplantation TBS, pre-transplantation AFP slope, microvascular invasion on explant, poor tumor differentiation on explant, and change in pre-transplantation TBS normalized by the number of locoregional therapy received. This outperformed the RETREAT Score (C-Index 0.70). A Random Survival Forest model including only pre-operative variables (AFP at transplantation, pre-transplantation AFP Slope, change in AFP from listing to transplantation, maximum pre-transplantation TBS, and ALBI Grade change from listing to transplantation) was also able to predict post-LT HCC recurrence (C-Index 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a novel ML model that outperforms a widely used post-transplantation HCC recurrence risk score. This model may be used to better risk stratify patients following transplantation and tailor surveillance/adjuvant therapy. The pre-transplantation ML model may be used with the Milan Criteria to further risk stratify patients being considered for transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520704,"journal":{"name":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To enhance post-transplantation hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence prediction by evaluating additional novel risk factors and leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods: Using the UNOS database, we identified adult HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation (2015-2018) and considered >50 available clinical, radiographic, laboratory/biomarker, and explant pathology variables to predict post-transplantation recurrence free survival. The cohort was split 70:30 into training and test datasets. Recursive feature elimination was employed to select an optimal number of variables for each candidate ML model. Final model performance was compared to clinically used tools with the test dataset.

Results: Of the 3106 patients identified, 7.2% developed post-transplantation HCC recurrence. The Gradient Boosting Survival algorithm performed best (C-index 0.73) and included 7 variables: explant tumor burden score (TBS), AFP at transplantation, maximum pre-transplantation TBS, pre-transplantation AFP slope, microvascular invasion on explant, poor tumor differentiation on explant, and change in pre-transplantation TBS normalized by the number of locoregional therapy received. This outperformed the RETREAT Score (C-Index 0.70). A Random Survival Forest model including only pre-operative variables (AFP at transplantation, pre-transplantation AFP Slope, change in AFP from listing to transplantation, maximum pre-transplantation TBS, and ALBI Grade change from listing to transplantation) was also able to predict post-LT HCC recurrence (C-Index 0.69).

Conclusions: We developed a novel ML model that outperforms a widely used post-transplantation HCC recurrence risk score. This model may be used to better risk stratify patients following transplantation and tailor surveillance/adjuvant therapy. The pre-transplantation ML model may be used with the Milan Criteria to further risk stratify patients being considered for transplantation.

机器学习提高肝细胞癌移植后复发预测。
背景:通过评估其他新的危险因素和利用最先进的机器学习(ML)算法来增强移植后肝细胞癌(HCC)复发预测。方法:使用UNOS数据库,我们确定了接受肝移植的成年HCC患者(2015-2018),并考虑了50个可用的临床、放射学、实验室/生物标志物和外植体病理变量来预测移植后无复发生存期。队列按70:30分成训练和测试数据集。采用递归特征消去法为每个候选ML模型选择最优数量的变量。将最终的模型性能与临床使用的工具与测试数据集进行比较。结果:在确定的3106例患者中,7.2%发生移植后HCC复发。梯度增强生存算法表现最佳(c指数0.73),包括7个变量:外植体肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)、移植时AFP、移植前最大TBS、移植前AFP斜率、外植体微血管侵犯、外植体肿瘤分化差、移植前TBS的变化经局部治疗次数归一化。这优于撤退得分(C-Index 0.70)。随机生存森林模型仅包含术前变量(移植时AFP、移植前AFP斜率、AFP从上市到移植的变化、移植前最大TBS和上市到移植的ALBI分级变化)也能够预测lt后HCC复发(C-Index 0.69)。结论:我们开发了一种新的ML模型,优于广泛使用的移植后HCC复发风险评分。该模型可用于更好地对移植后患者进行风险分层和定制监测/辅助治疗。移植前ML模型可以与米兰标准一起使用,进一步对考虑移植的患者进行风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信