{"title":"Can lower limb ischemic preconditioning improve aerobic capacity in healthy adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Limingfei Zhou, Jianyu Gan, Yineng Tan, Yundi Zhang, Dapeng Bao, Junhong Zhou","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of lower limb ischemic preconditioning (IPC/LL) on aerobic capacity in healthy adults. The search was conducted in five electronic databases. Two authors independently reviewed the search results, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to determine the overall effect size and the impact of potential moderators. Twenty publications consisting of 297 participants were included. The overall analysis showed that time to exhaustion was significantly improved after IPC/LL intervention compared with the control (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.40, 95% CI (0.16, 0.64), <i>p</i> < 0.01). In subgroup analysis, time to exhaustion was significantly improved only in single-pass intervention conditions, in untrained participants, and assessed by cycling exercise tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant effect was observed on time trial performance (Hedges' <i>g</i> = -0.08, 95% CI (-0.33, 0.16), <i>p</i> = 0.50), peak oxygen uptake (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.17, 0.21), <i>p</i> = 0.85), and blood lactate (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.09, 95% CI (-0.06, 0.23), <i>p</i> = 0.26) in healthy adults after IPC/LL intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that IPC/LL does not improve the aerobic capacity of healthy adults but contributes to an enhancement in time to exhaustion during aerobic exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":"50 ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of lower limb ischemic preconditioning (IPC/LL) on aerobic capacity in healthy adults. The search was conducted in five electronic databases. Two authors independently reviewed the search results, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to determine the overall effect size and the impact of potential moderators. Twenty publications consisting of 297 participants were included. The overall analysis showed that time to exhaustion was significantly improved after IPC/LL intervention compared with the control (Hedges' g = 0.40, 95% CI (0.16, 0.64), p < 0.01). In subgroup analysis, time to exhaustion was significantly improved only in single-pass intervention conditions, in untrained participants, and assessed by cycling exercise tests (p < 0.05). However, no significant effect was observed on time trial performance (Hedges' g = -0.08, 95% CI (-0.33, 0.16), p = 0.50), peak oxygen uptake (Hedges' g = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.17, 0.21), p = 0.85), and blood lactate (Hedges' g = 0.09, 95% CI (-0.06, 0.23), p = 0.26) in healthy adults after IPC/LL intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that IPC/LL does not improve the aerobic capacity of healthy adults but contributes to an enhancement in time to exhaustion during aerobic exercise.
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究下肢缺血预处理(IPC/LL)对健康成人有氧能力的影响。搜索工作在五个电子数据库中进行。两位作者独立审查了搜索结果,提取了数据,并评估了偏倚风险和证据的确定性。进行meta分析和亚组分析以确定总体效应大小和潜在调节因子的影响。包括297名参与者的20份出版物。总体分析显示,IPC/LL干预后,与对照组相比,健康成人的疲劳时间(Hedges' g = 0.40, 95% CI (0.16, 0.64), p p g = -0.08, 95% CI (-0.33, 0.16), p = 0.50)、峰值摄氧量(Hedges' g = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.17, 0.21), p = 0.85)和血乳酸(Hedges' g = 0.09, 95% CI (-0.06, 0.23), p = 0.26)均有显著改善。本系统综述和荟萃分析提供了适度的证据,表明IPC/LL不能提高健康成人的有氧运动能力,但有助于在有氧运动中及时增强疲劳。