Improving Pressure Steam Sterilization Quality Through Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: A Pre-Post Intervention Study in Central Sterile Supply Departments.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S516409
Yanrong Zhang, Ruixue Hu, Yanhua Chen, Xiaoxiao Liu, Jin Wu, Liangying Yi
{"title":"Improving Pressure Steam Sterilization Quality Through Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: A Pre-Post Intervention Study in Central Sterile Supply Departments.","authors":"Yanrong Zhang, Ruixue Hu, Yanhua Chen, Xiaoxiao Liu, Jin Wu, Liangying Yi","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S516409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) in reducing quality defects during pressure steam sterilization in the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study followed a structured HFMEA framework: (1) A multidisciplinary team (n=7) with CSSD expertise was established to analyze sterilization workflows, including instrument scanning, sterilization verification, and post-sterilization cooling. (2) Process mapping and risk prioritization were conducted using a 4-level severity/occurrence matrix (adapted from Australian clinical risk criteria) to calculate Risk Priority Numbers (RPN=Severity×Occurrence). High-risk failure modes (RPN≥8 or severity=4) were identified, including unlabeled \"non-sterilized\" packages (due to incomplete scanning), wet packages (from insufficient cooling<30 minutes), and unverified sterilization information. (3) Root causes were analyzed via fishbone diagrams (human, machine, material, environment, method). Targeted interventions included: optimizing the traceability system with department-specific alerts, standardizing scanning protocols, staff retraining on verification procedures, increasing instrument inventory and sterilizer racks, and implementing performance monitoring with 5W1H checklists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-intervention, 87 defects were identified among 185,382 sterilization packages (32 unlabeled \"non-sterilized\", 10 wet packages). Post-intervention, defects decreased to 11/189,531 packages (χ²=115.556, P<0.001), including 4 unlabeled (χ²=374.951, P<0.001) and 2 wet packages (χ²=8.889, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systematic HFMEA application reduced sterilization defects by addressing critical workflow gaps, demonstrating its value in enhancing CSSD quality control and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2313-2321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S516409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) in reducing quality defects during pressure steam sterilization in the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD).

Methods: The study followed a structured HFMEA framework: (1) A multidisciplinary team (n=7) with CSSD expertise was established to analyze sterilization workflows, including instrument scanning, sterilization verification, and post-sterilization cooling. (2) Process mapping and risk prioritization were conducted using a 4-level severity/occurrence matrix (adapted from Australian clinical risk criteria) to calculate Risk Priority Numbers (RPN=Severity×Occurrence). High-risk failure modes (RPN≥8 or severity=4) were identified, including unlabeled "non-sterilized" packages (due to incomplete scanning), wet packages (from insufficient cooling<30 minutes), and unverified sterilization information. (3) Root causes were analyzed via fishbone diagrams (human, machine, material, environment, method). Targeted interventions included: optimizing the traceability system with department-specific alerts, standardizing scanning protocols, staff retraining on verification procedures, increasing instrument inventory and sterilizer racks, and implementing performance monitoring with 5W1H checklists.

Results: Pre-intervention, 87 defects were identified among 185,382 sterilization packages (32 unlabeled "non-sterilized", 10 wet packages). Post-intervention, defects decreased to 11/189,531 packages (χ²=115.556, P<0.001), including 4 unlabeled (χ²=374.951, P<0.001) and 2 wet packages (χ²=8.889, P=0.003).

Conclusion: Systematic HFMEA application reduced sterilization defects by addressing critical workflow gaps, demonstrating its value in enhancing CSSD quality control and patient safety.

通过医疗失效模式及效果分析提高压力蒸汽灭菌质量:中心无菌供应科干预前后的研究
目的:评价卫生保健失效模式与效果分析(HFMEA)在减少中央无菌供应科(CSSD)压力蒸汽灭菌质量缺陷中的效果。方法:研究遵循结构化的HFMEA框架:(1)建立一个具有CSSD专业知识的多学科团队(n=7),分析灭菌工作流程,包括仪器扫描,灭菌验证和灭菌后冷却。(2)采用4级严重/发生矩阵(改编自澳大利亚临床风险标准)进行流程映射和风险优先级排序,以计算风险优先级编号(RPN=Severity×Occurrence)。发现了高风险失效模式(RPN≥8或严重程度=4),包括未标记的“未灭菌”包装(由于扫描不完全)、湿包装(由于冷却不足)。结果:干预前,在185,382个灭菌包装中发现了87个缺陷(32个未标记的“未灭菌”,10个湿包装)。结论:系统的HFMEA应用通过解决关键的工作流程差距,减少了灭菌缺陷,显示了其在加强CSSD质量控制和患者安全方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信