Risk Factors for Hearing Loss Are Comparable in Preterm Versus Term Children: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1111/apa.70222
Pauline Roehrs, Anna-Katharina Rohlfs, Reinhard Vonthein, Camilla Simon, Juliane Spiegler
{"title":"Risk Factors for Hearing Loss Are Comparable in Preterm Versus Term Children: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Pauline Roehrs, Anna-Katharina Rohlfs, Reinhard Vonthein, Camilla Simon, Juliane Spiegler","doi":"10.1111/apa.70222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Hearing loss occurs more frequently in preterm children. However, the influence of prematurity itself is unclear. We examined whether risk factors for hearing loss differ between preterm and term infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of three databases in March 2023 for studies comparing risk factors for hearing loss in preterm and term children. Studies on postnatal trauma, chemotherapy or infections after the age of 5 years were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed using logistic regression to yield odds ratios (95% confidence interval).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 300 studies screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria, including 9059 preterm and 10 048 term children. Only one study compared risk factors between preterm and term infants as primary outcomes. It identified an increased risk in the preterm but not term group with mechanical ventilation exceeding 5 days, sepsis, and ototoxic medication. No significant differences were found when both groups shared these risk factors, suggesting that prematurity may not be an independent risk factor. Other studies reported variable results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence of different effect sizes of risk factors in preterm and term children remains inconclusive. Preterm children acquire more risk factors in the neonatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Hearing loss occurs more frequently in preterm children. However, the influence of prematurity itself is unclear. We examined whether risk factors for hearing loss differ between preterm and term infants.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of three databases in March 2023 for studies comparing risk factors for hearing loss in preterm and term children. Studies on postnatal trauma, chemotherapy or infections after the age of 5 years were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed. Data were extracted and analyzed using logistic regression to yield odds ratios (95% confidence interval).

Results: Of 10 300 studies screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria, including 9059 preterm and 10 048 term children. Only one study compared risk factors between preterm and term infants as primary outcomes. It identified an increased risk in the preterm but not term group with mechanical ventilation exceeding 5 days, sepsis, and ototoxic medication. No significant differences were found when both groups shared these risk factors, suggesting that prematurity may not be an independent risk factor. Other studies reported variable results.

Conclusion: Evidence of different effect sizes of risk factors in preterm and term children remains inconclusive. Preterm children acquire more risk factors in the neonatal period.

听力损失的危险因素在早产儿和足月儿童中具有可比性:一项系统综述。
目的:听力损失在早产儿中更为常见。然而,早产本身的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了早产儿和足月儿听力损失的危险因素是否不同。方法:我们于2023年3月对三个数据库进行了系统检索,以比较早产儿和足月儿听力损失的危险因素。排除出生后创伤、化疗或5岁后感染的研究。评估偏倚风险。提取数据并使用逻辑回归进行分析,得出优势比(95%置信区间)。结果:在筛选的10300项研究中,16项符合纳入标准,包括9059例早产儿和10048例足月儿童。只有一项研究比较了早产儿和足月儿之间的风险因素作为主要结果。该研究发现,机械通气超过5天、败血症和耳毒性药物治疗的早产儿(而非足月组)风险增加。当两组都有这些危险因素时,没有发现显著差异,这表明早产可能不是一个独立的危险因素。其他研究报告了不同的结果。结论:早产儿和足月儿的危险因素影响大小的证据尚不明确。早产儿在新生儿期获得更多的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信