Predictive processing in biological motion perception: Evidence from human behavior.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hüseyin O Elmas, Sena Er, Ada D Rezaki, Aysesu Izgi, Buse M Urgen, Huseyin Boyaci, Burcu A Urgen
{"title":"Predictive processing in biological motion perception: Evidence from human behavior.","authors":"Hüseyin O Elmas, Sena Er, Ada D Rezaki, Aysesu Izgi, Buse M Urgen, Huseyin Boyaci, Burcu A Urgen","doi":"10.1177/03010066251355391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological motion perception plays a crucial role in understanding the actions of other animals, facilitating effective social interactions. Although traditionally viewed as a bottom-up driven process, recent research suggests that top-down mechanisms, including attention and expectation, significantly influence biological motion perception at all levels, particularly highlighted under complex or ambiguous conditions. In this study, we investigated the effect of expectation on biological motion perception using a cued individuation task with point-light display (PLD) stimuli. We conducted three experiments investigating how prior information regarding action, emotion, and gender of PLD stimuli modulates perceptual processing. We observed a statistically significant congruency effect when preceding cues informed about action of the upcoming biological motion stimulus; participants performed slower in incongruent trials compared to congruent trials. This effect seems to be mainly driven from the 75% congruency condition compared to the non-informative 50% (chance level) validity condition. The congruency effect that was observed in the action experiment was absent in the emotion and gender experiments. These findings highlight the nuanced role of prior information in biological motion perception, particularly emphasizing that action-related cues, when moderately reliable, can influence biological motion perception. Our results are in line with the predictive processing framework, suggesting that the integration of top-down and bottom-up processes is context-dependent and influenced by the nature of prior information. Our results also emphasize the need to develop more comprehensive frameworks that incorporate naturalistic, complex and dynamic, stimuli to build better models of biological motion perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"3010066251355391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251355391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological motion perception plays a crucial role in understanding the actions of other animals, facilitating effective social interactions. Although traditionally viewed as a bottom-up driven process, recent research suggests that top-down mechanisms, including attention and expectation, significantly influence biological motion perception at all levels, particularly highlighted under complex or ambiguous conditions. In this study, we investigated the effect of expectation on biological motion perception using a cued individuation task with point-light display (PLD) stimuli. We conducted three experiments investigating how prior information regarding action, emotion, and gender of PLD stimuli modulates perceptual processing. We observed a statistically significant congruency effect when preceding cues informed about action of the upcoming biological motion stimulus; participants performed slower in incongruent trials compared to congruent trials. This effect seems to be mainly driven from the 75% congruency condition compared to the non-informative 50% (chance level) validity condition. The congruency effect that was observed in the action experiment was absent in the emotion and gender experiments. These findings highlight the nuanced role of prior information in biological motion perception, particularly emphasizing that action-related cues, when moderately reliable, can influence biological motion perception. Our results are in line with the predictive processing framework, suggesting that the integration of top-down and bottom-up processes is context-dependent and influenced by the nature of prior information. Our results also emphasize the need to develop more comprehensive frameworks that incorporate naturalistic, complex and dynamic, stimuli to build better models of biological motion perception.

生物运动感知中的预测处理:来自人类行为的证据。
生物运动感知在理解其他动物的行为、促进有效的社会互动方面起着至关重要的作用。虽然传统上认为是自下而上驱动的过程,但最近的研究表明,自上而下的机制,包括注意和期望,在所有层面上显著影响生物运动感知,特别是在复杂或模糊的条件下。在这项研究中,我们通过点光显示(PLD)刺激的线索个性化任务研究了期望对生物运动感知的影响。我们进行了三个实验,研究关于动作、情绪和性别的先验信息如何调节PLD刺激的知觉加工。我们观察到,当先前的线索告知即将到来的生物运动刺激的动作时,统计学上显著的一致性效应;参与者在不一致试验中比在一致试验中表现得更慢。这种效果似乎主要来自75%一致性条件,而非信息性的50%(机会水平)效度条件。在动作实验中观察到的一致性效应在情绪和性别实验中不存在。这些发现强调了先验信息在生物运动感知中的微妙作用,特别强调了与动作相关的线索,当适度可靠时,可以影响生物运动感知。我们的研究结果与预测加工框架一致,表明自上而下和自下而上过程的整合依赖于上下文,并受到先验信息性质的影响。我们的研究结果还强调需要开发更全面的框架,将自然的、复杂的和动态的刺激结合起来,以建立更好的生物运动感知模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信