The independent and joint role of socioeconomic status and family relationships on mortality risk in China: cultural differences and health inequalities in the context of intergenerational cohabitation.
IF 3.2 3区 医学Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zhixi Zhu, Yiying Wang, Xin Wang, Fuyan Zhang, Lisha Yu, Tao Liu
{"title":"The independent and joint role of socioeconomic status and family relationships on mortality risk in China: cultural differences and health inequalities in the context of intergenerational cohabitation.","authors":"Zhixi Zhu, Yiying Wang, Xin Wang, Fuyan Zhang, Lisha Yu, Tao Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01669-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic status (SES) and family relationships are critical social determinants of health disparities. The mechanisms underlying their interactions remain insufficiently understood in Asian cultures with prevalent intergenerational cohabitation. This study investigates the independent and combined effects of SES and family relationships on all-cause mortality in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A baseline survey was conducted in 2010 involving 9280 adult permanent residents from 12 counties (districts) in Guizhou Province, using stratified cluster random sampling. Two follow-ups (2016-2020, 2023) were conducted. SES was assessed using a composite score comprising household income, education, and occupation, while family relationships were classified as either \"good\" or \"mediocre.\" The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the independent and combined effects of SES and family relationships on all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5949 participants were included, and the cumulative mortality rate was 6.4% over a median follow-up of 12 years. With a decrease in mortality risk as SES increased (P < 0.001). Compared with SES ≤ 6, mortality risk with SES scores of 7, 8, and ≥ 9 decreased by 36.9% (HR = 0.631, 95% CI = 0.473-0.842), 36.6% (HR = 0.644, 95% CI = 0.469-0.886), and 73% (HR = 0.270, 95% CI = 0.183-0.397), respectively. The independent effect of family relationship on the risk of death was not statistically significant (HR = 0.847, 95% CI = 0.0.670- 1.070). The joint analysis showed the compensatory effect was significant when SES exceeded a threshold (SES ≥ 9), alleviating the mortality risk associated with family relationships (HR = 0.2197, 95% CI = 0.073-0.652).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate SES independently reduces mortality in Chinese populations, while the effect of family relationships is modulated by cultural background. The resource substitution hypothesis is valid at specific SES thresholds. Intervention efforts should prioritize the vulnerable group characterized by \"low SES and weak family support\".</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01669-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) and family relationships are critical social determinants of health disparities. The mechanisms underlying their interactions remain insufficiently understood in Asian cultures with prevalent intergenerational cohabitation. This study investigates the independent and combined effects of SES and family relationships on all-cause mortality in China.
Methods: A baseline survey was conducted in 2010 involving 9280 adult permanent residents from 12 counties (districts) in Guizhou Province, using stratified cluster random sampling. Two follow-ups (2016-2020, 2023) were conducted. SES was assessed using a composite score comprising household income, education, and occupation, while family relationships were classified as either "good" or "mediocre." The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the independent and combined effects of SES and family relationships on all-cause mortality.
Results: Among 5949 participants were included, and the cumulative mortality rate was 6.4% over a median follow-up of 12 years. With a decrease in mortality risk as SES increased (P < 0.001). Compared with SES ≤ 6, mortality risk with SES scores of 7, 8, and ≥ 9 decreased by 36.9% (HR = 0.631, 95% CI = 0.473-0.842), 36.6% (HR = 0.644, 95% CI = 0.469-0.886), and 73% (HR = 0.270, 95% CI = 0.183-0.397), respectively. The independent effect of family relationship on the risk of death was not statistically significant (HR = 0.847, 95% CI = 0.0.670- 1.070). The joint analysis showed the compensatory effect was significant when SES exceeded a threshold (SES ≥ 9), alleviating the mortality risk associated with family relationships (HR = 0.2197, 95% CI = 0.073-0.652).
Conclusion: Findings demonstrate SES independently reduces mortality in Chinese populations, while the effect of family relationships is modulated by cultural background. The resource substitution hypothesis is valid at specific SES thresholds. Intervention efforts should prioritize the vulnerable group characterized by "low SES and weak family support".
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.