[Evaluation of serum cotinine cut-off value for distinguishing smoking status among Chinese adults].

Q3 Medicine
C M Ding, J Yin, F Zhao, Y W Li, Y Zhu, Y B Lyu, X M Shi
{"title":"[Evaluation of serum cotinine cut-off value for distinguishing smoking status among Chinese adults].","authors":"C M Ding, J Yin, F Zhao, Y W Li, Y Zhu, Y B Lyu, X M Shi","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240902-00696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To determine the optimal cut-off value of serum cotinine for distinguishing smoking status among Chinese adults based on a large-scale national sample. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted among 8 987 Chinese adults aged 20-79 years from 152 administrative counties across 31 provinces during 2017-2018. Sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, smoking status, and health status were collected via questionnaires and physical examinations. Blood samples were analyzed for serum cotinine levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and for blood creatinine levels using the picric acid method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed with serum cotinine concentration as the test variable and self-reported smoking status as the state variable. The optimal cut-off value was determined based on the maximum Youden's index, and the bootstrap method was used for repeated sampling (2 000 times) to evaluate the confidence interval of the cut-off value. The net reclassification index (NRI) was used to evaluate the discrimination ability of the cut-off value of this study, the cut-off value of the American population 1 (total population: 3.3 μg/L, men: 4.1 μg/L, women: 3.0 μg/L) and the cut-off value of the American population 2 (the recommended value of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the total population: 10.0 μg/L) against the smoking status of the Chinese population. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 27 and Python 3.11, with a significance level of α=0.05. <b>Results:</b> The age of the research subjects was (49.2±15.2) years. Among them, males accounted for 49.8% (4 477); smokers accounted for 28.8% (2 586); the detection rate of serum cotinine was 94.6% (8 501), and the <i>M</i> (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub><i>, Q</i><sub>3</sub>) concentration of serum cotinine was 0.9 (0.3, 85.4) μg/L. The ROC curve analysis results showed that the cut-off value (95%<i>CI</i>) of serum cotinine in the total population was 8.8 (6.7-11.7) μg/L, with the specificity (95%<i>CI</i>) about 93.6%(92.7%-94.3%), the sensitivity (95%<i>CI</i>) about 91.0%(89.7%-92.3%) and the area under the curve (AUC) (95%<i>CI</i>) about 0.93 (0.92-0.94). The cut-off value (95%<i>CI</i>) of cotinine for males was 17.1 (8.8-21.8) μg/L, with the specificity (95%<i>CI</i>) about 90.7%(87.9%-92.0%), the sensitivity (95%<i>CI</i>) about 89.4%(88.4%-92.2%) and the AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) about 0.92 (0.91-0.93). The cut-off value (95%<i>CI</i>) of cotinine for females was 7.4 (3.3-15.0) μg/L, with the specificity (95%<i>CI</i>) about 95.6%(92.7%-96.8%), the sensitivity (95%<i>CI</i>) about 87.6%(81.6%-92.8%) and the AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) about 0.92 (0.87-0.95). The NRI analysis results showed that compared with the cut-off value of the American population 2, the NRI of this study's cut-off values in the total population, males and females were 0.020 (<i>P</i>=0.015), 0.033 (<i>P</i>=0.015) and 0.011 (<i>P</i>=0.380), respectively, indicating that this study's cutoff value could have better classification performance in the total population and males. Compared with the cut-off value of the American population 2, the NRI of the total population in this study was 0.001 (<i>P</i>=0.285). <b>Conclusion:</b> The serum cotinine cut-off value based on the analysis of large sample data in China is more suitable for distinguishing the smoking status of Chinese adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"59 7","pages":"1063-1068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240902-00696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the optimal cut-off value of serum cotinine for distinguishing smoking status among Chinese adults based on a large-scale national sample. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 8 987 Chinese adults aged 20-79 years from 152 administrative counties across 31 provinces during 2017-2018. Sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, smoking status, and health status were collected via questionnaires and physical examinations. Blood samples were analyzed for serum cotinine levels using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and for blood creatinine levels using the picric acid method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed with serum cotinine concentration as the test variable and self-reported smoking status as the state variable. The optimal cut-off value was determined based on the maximum Youden's index, and the bootstrap method was used for repeated sampling (2 000 times) to evaluate the confidence interval of the cut-off value. The net reclassification index (NRI) was used to evaluate the discrimination ability of the cut-off value of this study, the cut-off value of the American population 1 (total population: 3.3 μg/L, men: 4.1 μg/L, women: 3.0 μg/L) and the cut-off value of the American population 2 (the recommended value of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the total population: 10.0 μg/L) against the smoking status of the Chinese population. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 27 and Python 3.11, with a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The age of the research subjects was (49.2±15.2) years. Among them, males accounted for 49.8% (4 477); smokers accounted for 28.8% (2 586); the detection rate of serum cotinine was 94.6% (8 501), and the M (Q1, Q3) concentration of serum cotinine was 0.9 (0.3, 85.4) μg/L. The ROC curve analysis results showed that the cut-off value (95%CI) of serum cotinine in the total population was 8.8 (6.7-11.7) μg/L, with the specificity (95%CI) about 93.6%(92.7%-94.3%), the sensitivity (95%CI) about 91.0%(89.7%-92.3%) and the area under the curve (AUC) (95%CI) about 0.93 (0.92-0.94). The cut-off value (95%CI) of cotinine for males was 17.1 (8.8-21.8) μg/L, with the specificity (95%CI) about 90.7%(87.9%-92.0%), the sensitivity (95%CI) about 89.4%(88.4%-92.2%) and the AUC (95%CI) about 0.92 (0.91-0.93). The cut-off value (95%CI) of cotinine for females was 7.4 (3.3-15.0) μg/L, with the specificity (95%CI) about 95.6%(92.7%-96.8%), the sensitivity (95%CI) about 87.6%(81.6%-92.8%) and the AUC (95%CI) about 0.92 (0.87-0.95). The NRI analysis results showed that compared with the cut-off value of the American population 2, the NRI of this study's cut-off values in the total population, males and females were 0.020 (P=0.015), 0.033 (P=0.015) and 0.011 (P=0.380), respectively, indicating that this study's cutoff value could have better classification performance in the total population and males. Compared with the cut-off value of the American population 2, the NRI of the total population in this study was 0.001 (P=0.285). Conclusion: The serum cotinine cut-off value based on the analysis of large sample data in China is more suitable for distinguishing the smoking status of Chinese adults.

[血清可替宁截断值对中国成人吸烟状况鉴别的评价]。
目的:在全国大样本的基础上,确定血清可替宁区分中国成年人吸烟状况的最佳临界值。方法:对2017-2018年来自31个省152个行政县的8987名20-79岁的中国成年人进行横断面研究。通过问卷调查和体格检查收集社会人口特征、生活方式、吸烟状况和健康状况。使用液相色谱-质谱法分析血液样本的血清可替宁水平,使用苦味酸法分析血液肌酐水平。以血清可替宁浓度为检验变量,自我报告吸烟状况为状态变量,进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。根据最大约登指数确定最优截断值,采用自举法重复采样(2 000次),评估截断值的置信区间。采用净重分类指数(NRI)评价本研究的临界值、美国人口1的临界值(总人口:3.3 μg/L,男性:4.1 μg/L,女性:3.0 μg/L)和美国人口2的临界值(美国疾病控制与预防中心对总人口的推荐值:10.0 μg/L)对中国人口吸烟状况的判别能力。采用IBM SPSS 27和Python 3.11进行统计学分析,显著性水平为α=0.05。结果:研究对象年龄为(49.2±15.2)岁。其中,男性4 477例,占49.8%;吸烟者占28.8%(2586人);血清可替宁检出率为94.6%(8 501),血清可替宁M (Q1, Q3)浓度为0.9 (0.3,85.4)μg/L。ROC曲线分析结果显示,人群血清可替宁的临界值(95%CI)为8.8 (6.7 ~ 11.7)μg/L,特异性(95%CI)约为93.6%(92.7% ~ 94.3%),敏感性(95%CI)约为91.0%(89.7% ~ 92.3%),曲线下面积(95%CI)约为0.93(0.92 ~ 0.94)。男性可替宁的截断值(95%CI)为17.1 (8.8 ~ 21.8)μg/L,特异度(95%CI)约为90.7%(87.9% ~ 92.0%),敏感性(95%CI)约为89.4%(88.4% ~ 92.2%),AUC (95%CI)约为0.92(0.91 ~ 0.93)。雌性可替宁的截断值(95%CI)为7.4 (3.3 ~ 15.0)μg/L,特异度(95%CI)约为95.6%(92.7% ~ 96.8%),敏感性(95%CI)约为87.6%(81.6% ~ 92.8%),AUC (95%CI)约为0.92(0.87 ~ 0.95)。NRI分析结果显示,与美国人口2的截断值相比,本研究的截断值在总人口、男性和女性中的NRI分别为0.020 (P=0.015)、0.033 (P=0.015)和0.011 (P=0.380),说明本研究的截断值在总人口和男性中具有更好的分类性能。与美国人口的临界值2相比,本研究总体人口的NRI为0.001 (P=0.285)。结论:基于中国大样本数据分析的血清可替宁截断值更适合用于区分中国成年人的吸烟状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华预防医学杂志
中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12678
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信