[Development and validation of the rapid health aging assessment scale for the Chinese population].

Q3 Medicine

中华预防医学杂志 Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20241121-00932

B Q Ye, J L Yang, J H Li, W N Chen, J H Ye, X T Zhou, Y Wang, S Q Li, Q Zhang, W Y Zhao, J Y Song, C Wang, Y Liu, M Xia

{"title":"[Development and validation of the rapid health aging assessment scale for the Chinese population].","authors":"B Q Ye, J L Yang, J H Li, W N Chen, J H Ye, X T Zhou, Y Wang, S Q Li, Q Zhang, W Y Zhao, J Y Song, C Wang, Y Liu, M Xia","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20241121-00932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To develop a rapid assessment scale for healthy aging suitable for the Chinese population. Methods: Based on existing healthy aging assessment scales, national standards, and expert consensus, an initial Healthy Aging Rapid Assessment Scale was drafted through two rounds of expert consultation. A pre-survey was conducted with 3 220 subjects recruited from Guangzhou between July 2023 and July 2024. Items were screened through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to form the final scale. Reliability and validity of the final scale were validated across five cities: Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Baoding, and Chuxiong. Results: The initial version comprised 36 items, while the finalized scale contained 18 items across three dimensions: metabolic health, mental health, and cognitive health. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.71 to 0.81 across all study sites. The Spearman-Brown coefficient varied between 0.91-0.96, Cronbach's α between 0.77-0.83, comparative fit index (CFI) between 0.90-0.98, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) between 0.90-0.99, and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) between 0.03-0.09. For the three dimensions, reliability and validity metrics demonstrated consistency: Spearman-Brown coefficients 0.87-0.99, Cronbach's α 0.77-0.83, CFI 0.90-0.98, GFI 0.90-0.99, and RMSEA 0.03-0.09 across four regions. Conclusion: The developed Healthy Aging Rapid Assessment Scale for the Chinese population exhibits robust reliability and validity.","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"59 7","pages":"1078-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20241121-00932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a rapid assessment scale for healthy aging suitable for the Chinese population. Methods: Based on existing healthy aging assessment scales, national standards, and expert consensus, an initial Healthy Aging Rapid Assessment Scale was drafted through two rounds of expert consultation. A pre-survey was conducted with 3 220 subjects recruited from Guangzhou between July 2023 and July 2024. Items were screened through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to form the final scale. Reliability and validity of the final scale were validated across five cities: Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Baoding, and Chuxiong. Results: The initial version comprised 36 items, while the finalized scale contained 18 items across three dimensions: metabolic health, mental health, and cognitive health. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.71 to 0.81 across all study sites. The Spearman-Brown coefficient varied between 0.91-0.96, Cronbach's α between 0.77-0.83, comparative fit index (CFI) between 0.90-0.98, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) between 0.90-0.99, and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) between 0.03-0.09. For the three dimensions, reliability and validity metrics demonstrated consistency: Spearman-Brown coefficients 0.87-0.99, Cronbach's α 0.77-0.83, CFI 0.90-0.98, GFI 0.90-0.99, and RMSEA 0.03-0.09 across four regions. Conclusion: The developed Healthy Aging Rapid Assessment Scale for the Chinese population exhibits robust reliability and validity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[中国人口健康老龄化快速评估量表的编制与验证]。

目的：建立适合中国人群的健康老龄化快速评价量表。方法：在现有健康老龄化评估量表、国家标准和专家共识的基础上，通过两轮专家咨询，初步编制健康老龄化快速评估量表。预调查于2023年7月至2024年7月在广州招募3220名受试者。通过项目分析和探索性因子分析进行项目筛选，形成最终量表。最终量表在广州、东莞、深圳、保定、楚雄五个城市进行信度和效度验证。结果：最初的量表包含36个项目，而最终的量表包含18个项目，跨越三个维度：代谢健康、心理健康和认知健康。所有研究地点的重测信度范围为0.71至0.81。Spearman-Brown系数在0.91 ~ 0.96之间，Cronbach’s α在0.77 ~ 0.83之间，比较拟合指数（CFI）在0.90 ~ 0.98之间，拟合优度指数（GFI）在0.90 ~ 0.99之间，近似均方根误差（RMSEA）在0.03 ~ 0.09之间。对于三个维度，信度和效度指标显示一致性：四个地区的Spearman-Brown系数0.87-0.99,Cronbach's α 0.77-0.83, CFI 0.90-0.98, GFI 0.90-0.99, RMSEA 0.03-0.09。结论：编制的中国人口健康老龄化快速评估量表具有良好的信度和效度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

12678

期刊介绍： Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.