[Research progress on the diagnostic performance and predictive accuracy of different prognostic scores as non-invasive liver fibrosis models for primary biliary cholangitis].

Q3 Medicine
J Feng, Y T Li, J M Xu, J Y Zhang, S M Li, Y M Tang
{"title":"[Research progress on the diagnostic performance and predictive accuracy of different prognostic scores as non-invasive liver fibrosis models for primary biliary cholangitis].","authors":"J Feng, Y T Li, J M Xu, J Y Zhang, S M Li, Y M Tang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240716-00328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The grade of histological severity is a determining factor to evaluate the prognosis and survival rate in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, liver biopsy is limited by sampling error, invasiveness, high cost, and poor compliance. Therefore, in order to overcome the limitations of liver biopsy, some non-invasive evaluation methods have been studied and applied to evaluate the progression of liver fibrosis in PBC. The prognostic score can be calculated using routine laboratory test results obtained at the time of diagnosis, which are characterized by their simplicity, affordability, ease of acquisition, and superior reproducibility. Recent studies have reported that the prognostic score can be employed as a non-invasive liver fibrosis model to diagnose the liver fibrosis stage in PBC and predict the transplant-free survival rate, in addition to being used to evaluate the patient prognosis and transplant-free survival (TFS). This paper reviews, summarizes, and explores the research progress of different prognostic scores as non-invasive liver fibrosis models via their diagnostic performance and predictive accuracy for PBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":24006,"journal":{"name":"中华肝脏病杂志","volume":"33 6","pages":"607-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝脏病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20240716-00328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The grade of histological severity is a determining factor to evaluate the prognosis and survival rate in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, liver biopsy is limited by sampling error, invasiveness, high cost, and poor compliance. Therefore, in order to overcome the limitations of liver biopsy, some non-invasive evaluation methods have been studied and applied to evaluate the progression of liver fibrosis in PBC. The prognostic score can be calculated using routine laboratory test results obtained at the time of diagnosis, which are characterized by their simplicity, affordability, ease of acquisition, and superior reproducibility. Recent studies have reported that the prognostic score can be employed as a non-invasive liver fibrosis model to diagnose the liver fibrosis stage in PBC and predict the transplant-free survival rate, in addition to being used to evaluate the patient prognosis and transplant-free survival (TFS). This paper reviews, summarizes, and explores the research progress of different prognostic scores as non-invasive liver fibrosis models via their diagnostic performance and predictive accuracy for PBC.

[不同预后评分作为原发性胆管炎非侵袭性肝纤维化模型的诊断性能及预测准确性研究进展]。
组织学严重程度的分级是评价原发性胆道性胆管炎(PBC)预后和生存率的决定性因素。然而,肝活检受到采样误差、侵入性、成本高和依从性差的限制。因此,为了克服肝活检的局限性,研究了一些无创评估方法,并应用于评估PBC肝纤维化的进展。预后评分可以使用诊断时获得的常规实验室检查结果来计算,其特点是简单、负担得起、易于获取和重复性好。近年来有研究报道,预后评分可作为无创肝纤维化模型,用于诊断PBC肝纤维化分期和预测无移植生存率,并可用于评价患者预后和无移植生存期(TFS)。本文就不同预后评分作为非侵袭性肝纤维化模型的诊断性能和对PBC的预测准确性进行综述、总结和探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华肝脏病杂志
中华肝脏病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7574
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信