[Effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic outside-in release for gluteal muscle contracture in supine position].

Q3 Medicine
Di Jia, Qiguo Ran, Fei Sun, Kun Zhang, Yanlin Li
{"title":"[Effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic outside-in release for gluteal muscle contracture in supine position].","authors":"Di Jia, Qiguo Ran, Fei Sun, Kun Zhang, Yanlin Li","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202504110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic outside-in release for gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) in supine position versus lateral decubitus position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 34 GMC patients meeting selection criteria between January 2022 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Arthroscopic contracture band release was performed in the lateral decubitus position (lateral group, <i>n</i>=14) or the supine position (supine group, <i>n</i>=20). No significant difference ( <i>P</i>>0.05) was observed between groups in baseline data, including gender, age, body mass index, preoperative GMC functional quantitative score, modified Harris hip score (mHHS), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and hip flexion/adduction range of motion (ROM). The total operation time, release procedure time, non-release procedure time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared. Functional outcomes (GMC functional quantitative score, mHHS score, VAS score, hip flexion/adduction ROM) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All incisions healed by first intention without major vascular or neurological complications. In the lateral group, 3 patients developed patchy bruising on bilateral buttocks and posterior thighs at 3 days after operation, which resolved after 2 weeks of ice packs and ultrasonic therapy. The supine group demonstrated significantly shorter total operation time, non-release procedure time, hospital stay, and reduced intraoperative blood loss versus the lateral group ( <i>P</i><0.05). No significant difference was found in release procedure time ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients were followed up 24 months. Both groups showed significant improvements ( <i>P</i><0.05) in mHHS score, GMC functional quantitative score, VAS score, and hip adduction/flexion ROM at all postoperative timepoints compared to preoperative values, with no significant intergroup differences ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both surgical positions effectively improve hip function in GMC patients. However, the supine position offers significant advantages over the lateral decubitus position in operation time, anesthesia management, intraoperative blood loss control, and reduced hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 7","pages":"848-854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202504110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic outside-in release for gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) in supine position versus lateral decubitus position.

Methods: The clinical data of 34 GMC patients meeting selection criteria between January 2022 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Arthroscopic contracture band release was performed in the lateral decubitus position (lateral group, n=14) or the supine position (supine group, n=20). No significant difference ( P>0.05) was observed between groups in baseline data, including gender, age, body mass index, preoperative GMC functional quantitative score, modified Harris hip score (mHHS), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and hip flexion/adduction range of motion (ROM). The total operation time, release procedure time, non-release procedure time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared. Functional outcomes (GMC functional quantitative score, mHHS score, VAS score, hip flexion/adduction ROM) were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results: All incisions healed by first intention without major vascular or neurological complications. In the lateral group, 3 patients developed patchy bruising on bilateral buttocks and posterior thighs at 3 days after operation, which resolved after 2 weeks of ice packs and ultrasonic therapy. The supine group demonstrated significantly shorter total operation time, non-release procedure time, hospital stay, and reduced intraoperative blood loss versus the lateral group ( P<0.05). No significant difference was found in release procedure time ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 24 months. Both groups showed significant improvements ( P<0.05) in mHHS score, GMC functional quantitative score, VAS score, and hip adduction/flexion ROM at all postoperative timepoints compared to preoperative values, with no significant intergroup differences ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: Both surgical positions effectively improve hip function in GMC patients. However, the supine position offers significant advantages over the lateral decubitus position in operation time, anesthesia management, intraoperative blood loss control, and reduced hospital stay.

[仰卧位下关节镜内外松解治疗臀肌挛缩的疗效分析]。
目的:比较关节镜下外向内松解治疗仰卧位和侧卧位臀肌挛缩的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年5月34例符合入选标准的GMC患者的临床资料。关节镜下挛缩带松解术采用侧卧位(侧位组,n=14)或仰卧位(仰卧位组,n=20)。各组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、术前GMC功能定量评分、改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、髋关节屈曲/内收活动度(ROM)等基线数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。记录总手术时间、松解时间、未松解时间、术中出血量、住院时间及术后并发症。术前、术后3个月、12个月和24个月评估功能结局(GMC功能定量评分、mHHS评分、VAS评分、髋关节屈曲/内收ROM)。结果:所有切口一期愈合,无重大血管或神经系统并发症。外侧组3例患者术后3天双侧臀部及大腿后部出现斑片状瘀伤,经2周冰敷及超声治疗后痊愈。仰卧位组与侧卧位组相比,总手术时间、非松解手术时间、住院时间和术中出血量均显著缩短(p < 0.05)。所有患者均随访24个月。两组均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:两种体位均能有效改善GMC患者的髋关节功能。然而,与侧卧位相比,仰卧位在手术时间、麻醉管理、术中出血量控制和缩短住院时间等方面具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信