Sricharan S Veeturi, Kerry E Poppenberg, Nandor K Pinter, Vinay Jaikumar, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui, Vincent M Tutino
{"title":"Evaluation of radiogenomics for risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms: a pilot study.","authors":"Sricharan S Veeturi, Kerry E Poppenberg, Nandor K Pinter, Vinay Jaikumar, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui, Vincent M Tutino","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03702-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) is an imaging biomarker that could aid in risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) In this pilot study, we explored the potential of a radiogenomics approach by combining blood-based biomarkers and AWE for better risk stratification of IAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient specific vessel wall imaging scans and whole blood samples were obtained, and IAs were classified as high-risk or low-risk using two different metrics: symptomatic status (3 symptomatic vs. 13 asymptomatic) and PHASES score (4 with a high score vs. 12 with a low score). Radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the pre- and post-contrast MRI for all IA sac walls, and significantly different RFs were identified through univariate analysis. RNA sequencing from whole blood samples for these patients was also performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high and low-risk IA groups. Principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis were applied, using both risk metrics, to evaluate discriminatory power. Lastly, ontological and correlation analyses were carried out to investigate biological mechanisms associated with the DEGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis of 16 IAs identified 12 RFs and 97 genes that were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs (RF: p-value < 0.05; DEG: fold-change > 2, p-value < 0.01). Examining risk with respect to PHASES score, we identified 6 significant radiomics features and 38 differentially expressed genes. Through principal component analysis and clustering analysis, we found that DEGs only and radiogenomics features produced a better separation between high- and low-risk than RFs alone for both risk metrics. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between 7 unique RFs and 38 DEGs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that a radiogenomics approach can help in better risk stratification of IAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"2425-2435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12546524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03702-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) is an imaging biomarker that could aid in risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) In this pilot study, we explored the potential of a radiogenomics approach by combining blood-based biomarkers and AWE for better risk stratification of IAs.
Methods: Patient specific vessel wall imaging scans and whole blood samples were obtained, and IAs were classified as high-risk or low-risk using two different metrics: symptomatic status (3 symptomatic vs. 13 asymptomatic) and PHASES score (4 with a high score vs. 12 with a low score). Radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the pre- and post-contrast MRI for all IA sac walls, and significantly different RFs were identified through univariate analysis. RNA sequencing from whole blood samples for these patients was also performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high and low-risk IA groups. Principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis were applied, using both risk metrics, to evaluate discriminatory power. Lastly, ontological and correlation analyses were carried out to investigate biological mechanisms associated with the DEGs.
Results: Our analysis of 16 IAs identified 12 RFs and 97 genes that were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs (RF: p-value < 0.05; DEG: fold-change > 2, p-value < 0.01). Examining risk with respect to PHASES score, we identified 6 significant radiomics features and 38 differentially expressed genes. Through principal component analysis and clustering analysis, we found that DEGs only and radiogenomics features produced a better separation between high- and low-risk than RFs alone for both risk metrics. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between 7 unique RFs and 38 DEGs.
Conclusion: We demonstrated that a radiogenomics approach can help in better risk stratification of IAs.
期刊介绍:
Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.