Evaluation of radiogenomics for risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms: a pilot study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s00234-025-03702-1
Sricharan S Veeturi, Kerry E Poppenberg, Nandor K Pinter, Vinay Jaikumar, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui, Vincent M Tutino
{"title":"Evaluation of radiogenomics for risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms: a pilot study.","authors":"Sricharan S Veeturi, Kerry E Poppenberg, Nandor K Pinter, Vinay Jaikumar, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui, Vincent M Tutino","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03702-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) is an imaging biomarker that could aid in risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) In this pilot study, we explored the potential of a radiogenomics approach by combining blood-based biomarkers and AWE for better risk stratification of IAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient specific vessel wall imaging scans and whole blood samples were obtained, and IAs were classified as high-risk or low-risk using two different metrics: symptomatic status (3 symptomatic vs. 13 asymptomatic) and PHASES score (4 with a high score vs. 12 with a low score). Radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the pre- and post-contrast MRI for all IA sac walls, and significantly different RFs were identified through univariate analysis. RNA sequencing from whole blood samples for these patients was also performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high and low-risk IA groups. Principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis were applied, using both risk metrics, to evaluate discriminatory power. Lastly, ontological and correlation analyses were carried out to investigate biological mechanisms associated with the DEGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis of 16 IAs identified 12 RFs and 97 genes that were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs (RF: p-value < 0.05; DEG: fold-change > 2, p-value < 0.01). Examining risk with respect to PHASES score, we identified 6 significant radiomics features and 38 differentially expressed genes. Through principal component analysis and clustering analysis, we found that DEGs only and radiogenomics features produced a better separation between high- and low-risk than RFs alone for both risk metrics. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between 7 unique RFs and 38 DEGs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that a radiogenomics approach can help in better risk stratification of IAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"2425-2435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12546524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03702-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) is an imaging biomarker that could aid in risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) In this pilot study, we explored the potential of a radiogenomics approach by combining blood-based biomarkers and AWE for better risk stratification of IAs.

Methods: Patient specific vessel wall imaging scans and whole blood samples were obtained, and IAs were classified as high-risk or low-risk using two different metrics: symptomatic status (3 symptomatic vs. 13 asymptomatic) and PHASES score (4 with a high score vs. 12 with a low score). Radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the pre- and post-contrast MRI for all IA sac walls, and significantly different RFs were identified through univariate analysis. RNA sequencing from whole blood samples for these patients was also performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high and low-risk IA groups. Principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis were applied, using both risk metrics, to evaluate discriminatory power. Lastly, ontological and correlation analyses were carried out to investigate biological mechanisms associated with the DEGs.

Results: Our analysis of 16 IAs identified 12 RFs and 97 genes that were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs (RF: p-value < 0.05; DEG: fold-change > 2, p-value < 0.01). Examining risk with respect to PHASES score, we identified 6 significant radiomics features and 38 differentially expressed genes. Through principal component analysis and clustering analysis, we found that DEGs only and radiogenomics features produced a better separation between high- and low-risk than RFs alone for both risk metrics. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between 7 unique RFs and 38 DEGs.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that a radiogenomics approach can help in better risk stratification of IAs.

放射基因组学对颅内动脉瘤风险分层的评估:一项初步研究。
目的:动脉瘤壁增强(AWE)是一种有助于颅内动脉瘤(IAs)风险分层的成像生物标志物。在本初步研究中,我们通过结合血液生物标志物和AWE,探索放射基因组学方法的潜力,以更好地对IAs进行风险分层。方法:获得患者特异性血管壁成像扫描和全血样本,并使用两种不同的指标将IAs分类为高风险或低风险:症状状态(3例有症状对13例无症状)和分期评分(4例高分对12例低分)。从造影前和造影后的MRI中提取所有IA囊壁的放射组学特征(RFs),通过单变量分析鉴定出显著不同的RFs。还对这些患者的全血样本进行了RNA测序,以鉴定高风险和低风险IA组之间的差异表达基因(DEGs)。采用主成分分析(PCA)和聚类分析,使用这两种风险指标来评估歧视能力。最后,进行了本体论和相关性分析,以探讨与deg相关的生物学机制。结果:我们对16例IAs进行了分析,鉴定出12个RF和97个基因在有症状和无症状IAs之间存在显著差异(RF: p值2,p值)。结论:我们证明了放射基因组学方法可以帮助更好地对IAs进行风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信