Accuracy and cross-validity of the Xiaomi Mi Band 2, 3, 4, and 5 wristbands in evaluating physical activity in adolescents according to WHO 2020 guidelines: School-Fit study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Daniel Mayorga-Vega, Santiago Guijarro-Romero, Carolina Casado-Robles, Jesús Viciana
{"title":"Accuracy and cross-validity of the Xiaomi Mi Band 2, 3, 4, and 5 wristbands in evaluating physical activity in adolescents according to WHO 2020 guidelines: School-Fit study.","authors":"Daniel Mayorga-Vega, Santiago Guijarro-Romero, Carolina Casado-Robles, Jesús Viciana","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.15590-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of the present study were to examine the accuracy and cross-validity of Xiaomi Mi Band (XMB) 2, 3, 4 and 5 activity wristband-measured daily physical activity thresholds related to achieving at least the recommended 60 minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a cross-sectional design, 70 adolescents (final sample=62; 54.84% females), aged 11-17 years old, from a public high school wore the activity wristbands XMB 2, 3, 4 and 5 (non-dominant wrist; index tests=steps, slow- and/or brisk-pace walking, total physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers (right hip; reference standard=moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity) for a day. 29.03% of the adolescents achieved the moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses showed that the accuracy of the activity wristband-measured daily steps thresholds was excellent (e.g., Sensitivity=1.00, Specificity=0.91, k=0.85), being higher than those with intensity-related physical activity outputs. The cross-validity results showed that thresholds from 8,521 to 9,070 steps/day had excellent values (e.g., Sensitivity/Specificity ≥0.90, k≥0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Activity wristband-measured daily steps thresholds are more accurate than those with intensity-related physical activity outputs for evaluating the recommended 60 minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity. A 9000-step-per-day recommendation is a simple and accurate activity wristband-based recommendation for adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.15590-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aims of the present study were to examine the accuracy and cross-validity of Xiaomi Mi Band (XMB) 2, 3, 4 and 5 activity wristband-measured daily physical activity thresholds related to achieving at least the recommended 60 minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity in adolescents.

Methods: Following a cross-sectional design, 70 adolescents (final sample=62; 54.84% females), aged 11-17 years old, from a public high school wore the activity wristbands XMB 2, 3, 4 and 5 (non-dominant wrist; index tests=steps, slow- and/or brisk-pace walking, total physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers (right hip; reference standard=moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity) for a day. 29.03% of the adolescents achieved the moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity recommendation.

Results: The results of the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses showed that the accuracy of the activity wristband-measured daily steps thresholds was excellent (e.g., Sensitivity=1.00, Specificity=0.91, k=0.85), being higher than those with intensity-related physical activity outputs. The cross-validity results showed that thresholds from 8,521 to 9,070 steps/day had excellent values (e.g., Sensitivity/Specificity ≥0.90, k≥0.75).

Conclusions: Activity wristband-measured daily steps thresholds are more accurate than those with intensity-related physical activity outputs for evaluating the recommended 60 minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity. A 9000-step-per-day recommendation is a simple and accurate activity wristband-based recommendation for adolescents.

b小米Mi Band 2、3、4和5腕带根据《世卫组织2020年指南:学校健康研究》评估青少年身体活动的准确性和交叉效度。
背景:本研究的目的是检验小米Mi Band (XMB) 2、3、4和5活动腕带测量的青少年每日身体活动阈值的准确性和交叉效度,这些阈值与每天至少达到推荐的60分钟中等至高强度身体活动有关。方法:采用横断面设计,70名青少年(最终样本=62;(54.84%女性),年龄11-17岁,来自公立高中,佩戴活动腕带XMB 2、3、4和5(非优势腕;指数测试=步数,慢速和/或快速行走,总体力活动和中度至剧烈体力活动)和ActiGraph wGT3X-BT加速度计(右臀部;参考标准=中等到高强度的体力活动)。29.03%的青少年达到了中等至高强度体力活动的建议。结果:受试者工作特征曲线分析结果显示,活动腕带测量的每日步数阈值的准确性非常好(例如,灵敏度=1.00,特异性=0.91,k=0.85),高于与强度相关的体力活动输出。交叉效度结果显示,从8,521到9,070步/天的阈值具有极好的值(例如,灵敏度/特异性≥0.90,k≥0.75)。结论:活动腕带测量的每日步数阈值比强度相关的体力活动输出值更准确,用于评估推荐的每天60分钟中等至高强度体力活动。每天9000步的建议是针对青少年的简单而准确的运动腕带建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信