Awareness of Psychosomatic Medicine in Korea: Results From an Online Survey Conducted With Doctors and the General Public.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hee Jin Kim, Hong Jun Jeon, Won Sub Kang, Jae-Won Choi, Seung-Ho Jang, Cheolmin Shin, Moon-Soo Lee, Hyungmo Sung, Jeongwan Hong, Sun Mi Kim, Jee Hyun Ha
{"title":"Awareness of Psychosomatic Medicine in Korea: Results From an Online Survey Conducted With Doctors and the General Public.","authors":"Hee Jin Kim, Hong Jun Jeon, Won Sub Kang, Jae-Won Choi, Seung-Ho Jang, Cheolmin Shin, Moon-Soo Lee, Hyungmo Sung, Jeongwan Hong, Sun Mi Kim, Jee Hyun Ha","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare psychosomatic medicine (PM) awareness, understanding, and related educational needs in doctors and the general public, and discuss how education for these groups should be provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Korean Psychosomatic Society conducted an online survey targeting 101 doctors and 100 general public, aged 20-60 years. Sociodemographic data, PM awareness, understanding, PM-related keyword before and after a brief introduction to PM, and educational needs concerning PM were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PM awareness, understanding, and educational needs concerning PM differed significantly between groups. The doctor group reported a significantly higher PM awareness and understanding, and there were significant differences between the groups regarding the frequently-selected PM-related keywords. In the doctor group, they were \"digestion,\" \"functional,\" \"irritable bowel syndrome,\" \"pain,\" \"psychogenic,\" and \"somatic symptom disorder\" in the general public group, they were \"brain,\" \"cause,\" \"influence,\" \"mind,\" \"panic disorder,\" \"problem,\" \"psychology,\" \"response,\" and \"treatment.\" Additionally, the brief introduction to PM improved PM awareness in both groups. There was a significant difference in the frequently-selected PM-related keywords after the brief introduction. In the doctor group, the words significantly more selected were \"association,\" \"concept,\" \"connection,\" and \"influence\" and the word significantly less selected was \"mind.\" In the general public group, the words significantly more selected were \"association,\" \"connection,\" \"irritable bowel syndrome,\" and \"somatic symptom disorder,\" and the words significantly less selected were \"autonomic nervous system,\" \"brain,\" \"menopause,\" \"panic disorder.\" The two groups also diverged in their educational needs concerning PM. The most frequently selected needs in the doctor group were \"stress and chronic pain,\" \"mental health issues in cancer patients,\" and \"stress and gastrointestinal disorders\" in the general public, they were \"how to self-manage stress,\" \"stress and chronic pain,\" and \"medical treatments for stress.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Doctors identified more PM-specific terms, whereas the general public had a vaguer understanding of PM. Even a brief education intervention significantly helped align the perceptions of both groups with current PM theory, highlighting the impact of education. Regarding PM educational content recommendations, the focus should be on stress education for the general public and on practical assessment and management of psychosomatic disorders for doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 27","pages":"e138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess and compare psychosomatic medicine (PM) awareness, understanding, and related educational needs in doctors and the general public, and discuss how education for these groups should be provided.

Methods: The Korean Psychosomatic Society conducted an online survey targeting 101 doctors and 100 general public, aged 20-60 years. Sociodemographic data, PM awareness, understanding, PM-related keyword before and after a brief introduction to PM, and educational needs concerning PM were collected.

Results: PM awareness, understanding, and educational needs concerning PM differed significantly between groups. The doctor group reported a significantly higher PM awareness and understanding, and there were significant differences between the groups regarding the frequently-selected PM-related keywords. In the doctor group, they were "digestion," "functional," "irritable bowel syndrome," "pain," "psychogenic," and "somatic symptom disorder" in the general public group, they were "brain," "cause," "influence," "mind," "panic disorder," "problem," "psychology," "response," and "treatment." Additionally, the brief introduction to PM improved PM awareness in both groups. There was a significant difference in the frequently-selected PM-related keywords after the brief introduction. In the doctor group, the words significantly more selected were "association," "concept," "connection," and "influence" and the word significantly less selected was "mind." In the general public group, the words significantly more selected were "association," "connection," "irritable bowel syndrome," and "somatic symptom disorder," and the words significantly less selected were "autonomic nervous system," "brain," "menopause," "panic disorder." The two groups also diverged in their educational needs concerning PM. The most frequently selected needs in the doctor group were "stress and chronic pain," "mental health issues in cancer patients," and "stress and gastrointestinal disorders" in the general public, they were "how to self-manage stress," "stress and chronic pain," and "medical treatments for stress."

Conclusion: Doctors identified more PM-specific terms, whereas the general public had a vaguer understanding of PM. Even a brief education intervention significantly helped align the perceptions of both groups with current PM theory, highlighting the impact of education. Regarding PM educational content recommendations, the focus should be on stress education for the general public and on practical assessment and management of psychosomatic disorders for doctors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

韩国对心身医学的认识:一项对医生和公众进行的在线调查的结果。
背景:本研究旨在评估和比较医生和公众对心身医学(PM)的认识、理解和相关教育需求,并讨论如何对这些群体进行教育。方法:韩国心身学会对101名医生和100名年龄在20-60岁的普通民众进行了在线调查。收集社会人口学数据、项目管理意识、理解、项目管理相关关键词、项目管理简要介绍前后、项目管理教育需求。结果:PM的意识、理解和PM的教育需求在组间有显著差异。医生组报告了更高的PM意识和理解,并且在频繁选择的PM相关关键词方面,两组之间存在显著差异。在医生组,他们是“消化”,“功能性”,“肠易激综合征”,“疼痛”,“心因性”和“躯体症状障碍”;在普通公众组,他们是“大脑”,“原因”,“影响”,“心灵”,“恐慌症”,“问题”,“心理”,“反应”和“治疗”。此外,对项目管理的简要介绍提高了两组的项目管理意识。在简要介绍后,频繁选择的pm相关关键词有显著差异。在医生组中,“联想”、“概念”、“联系”和“影响”这几个词被显著地更多地选择,而“头脑”这几个词被显著地少选择。在普通公众组中,“联想”、“联系”、“肠易激综合征”和“躯体症状障碍”等词的选择率明显更高,而“自主神经系统”、“大脑”、“更年期”、“恐慌症”等词的选择率明显更低。这两个群体在PM的教育需求上也存在分歧。医生组中最常选择的需求是“压力和慢性疼痛”、“癌症患者的心理健康问题”和“压力和胃肠道疾病”,他们是“如何自我管理压力”、“压力和慢性疼痛”和“压力的药物治疗”。结论:医生对PM特异性术语的认识较多,而公众对PM的认识较为模糊。即使是一个简短的教育干预也显著地帮助了这两个群体的看法与当前的PM理论保持一致,突出了教育的影响。关于PM教育内容的建议,重点应放在对公众的压力教育和对医生的心身疾病的实际评估和管理上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信