Validating Self-Other Differentiation in a Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Context: Virtues, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Peter J Jankowski, Steven J Sandage, Don E Davis, Laura B Stein, Elise Ji Young Choe
{"title":"Validating Self-Other Differentiation in a Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Context: Virtues, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being.","authors":"Peter J Jankowski, Steven J Sandage, Don E Davis, Laura B Stein, Elise Ji Young Choe","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We advanced the virtues of intellectual humility, gratitude, forgiveness, and emotion regulation as relevant to monitoring treatment progress. We did so by exploring the construct validity evidence for differentiation as an indicator of emotion regulation in a psychotherapy context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of clients (N = 117; M<sub>age</sub> = 37.96; 60.7% female; 69.2% White; 70.1% heterosexual; 70.9% religious identifying) receiving outpatient psychotherapy at a psychodynamic training clinic. First, we conducted exploratory factor analysis to examine the validity evidence for differentiation, as measured by widely used items. Second, we used the factor analytic results to measure differentiation as an indicator of emotion regulation. We modeled the virtues and differentiation as linear and curvilinear combinations predicting depression symptoms and well-being, using a series of polynomial regressions and response surface analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intra- and interpersonal aspects of differentiation, reactivity and emotional cutoff, respectively, showed evidence supporting their use as indicators of emotion regulation. Results also showed that the virtues and differentiation were curvilinear predictors of depression symptoms and well-being, with each of the virtues and reactivity combining to predict initial well-being, and intellectual humility and emotional cutoff combining to predict later treatment symptom levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our design limits inference about the directionality of associations, and we used a recently developed self-report measure of virtues. Nevertheless, our findings point to the use of intellectual humility, gratitude, forgiveness, and differentiation to monitor treatment effectiveness, and potentially guide psychotherapy processes to lower negative emotion (intra-personal differentiation) and increase positive emotion (gratitude, forgiveness) early in treatment, and enhance prosocial interpersonal responding (intellectual humility, interpersonal differentiation) later in treatment. We highlight that virtues can be indirectly addressed within alliance processes, and addressed via direct interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We advanced the virtues of intellectual humility, gratitude, forgiveness, and emotion regulation as relevant to monitoring treatment progress. We did so by exploring the construct validity evidence for differentiation as an indicator of emotion regulation in a psychotherapy context.

Method: The sample consisted of clients (N = 117; Mage = 37.96; 60.7% female; 69.2% White; 70.1% heterosexual; 70.9% religious identifying) receiving outpatient psychotherapy at a psychodynamic training clinic. First, we conducted exploratory factor analysis to examine the validity evidence for differentiation, as measured by widely used items. Second, we used the factor analytic results to measure differentiation as an indicator of emotion regulation. We modeled the virtues and differentiation as linear and curvilinear combinations predicting depression symptoms and well-being, using a series of polynomial regressions and response surface analyses.

Results: The intra- and interpersonal aspects of differentiation, reactivity and emotional cutoff, respectively, showed evidence supporting their use as indicators of emotion regulation. Results also showed that the virtues and differentiation were curvilinear predictors of depression symptoms and well-being, with each of the virtues and reactivity combining to predict initial well-being, and intellectual humility and emotional cutoff combining to predict later treatment symptom levels.

Conclusion: Our design limits inference about the directionality of associations, and we used a recently developed self-report measure of virtues. Nevertheless, our findings point to the use of intellectual humility, gratitude, forgiveness, and differentiation to monitor treatment effectiveness, and potentially guide psychotherapy processes to lower negative emotion (intra-personal differentiation) and increase positive emotion (gratitude, forgiveness) early in treatment, and enhance prosocial interpersonal responding (intellectual humility, interpersonal differentiation) later in treatment. We highlight that virtues can be indirectly addressed within alliance processes, and addressed via direct interventions.

心理动力心理治疗背景下的自我-他人分化验证:美德、情绪调节和幸福感。
目的:我们提出了与监测治疗进展相关的智力谦逊、感恩、宽恕和情绪调节的美德。我们通过探索分化作为心理治疗背景下情绪调节指标的构念效度证据来做到这一点。方法:样本由客户组成(N = 117;法师= 37.96;60.7%的女性;69.2%的白人;70.1%的异性恋者;70.9%有宗教信仰)在心理动力训练诊所接受门诊心理治疗。首先,我们进行了探索性因子分析,以检验区分的效度证据,如广泛使用的项目测量。其次,我们使用因子分析结果来衡量分化作为情绪调节的指标。我们使用一系列多项式回归和响应面分析,将优点和差异建模为预测抑郁症状和幸福感的线性和曲线组合。结果:分化、反应性和情绪切断分别在内部和人际方面显示出支持它们作为情绪调节指标的证据。结果还表明,美德和分化是抑郁症状和幸福感的曲线预测因子,每一种美德和反应性结合起来预测最初的幸福感,智力谦卑和情感切断结合起来预测后来的治疗症状水平。结论:我们的设计限制了对关联方向的推断,我们使用了最近开发的美德自我报告测量。然而,我们的研究结果表明,使用智力谦卑、感恩、宽恕和分化来监测治疗效果,并有可能指导心理治疗过程在治疗早期降低负面情绪(个人内分化)和增加积极情绪(感恩、宽恕),并在治疗后期增强亲社会人际反应(智力谦卑、人际分化)。我们强调,美德可以在联盟过程中间接解决,也可以通过直接干预来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信