The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Sense of Smell: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Cigarettes.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ahmet Koder, Safiye Özdil
{"title":"The Impact of Electronic Cigarettes on Sense of Smell: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Cigarettes.","authors":"Ahmet Koder, Safiye Özdil","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use on olfactory function and compare the outcomes with traditional cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were equally divided into 3 main groups (n=40 each): electronic cigarette users, traditional cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers. Among the e-cigarette users, 33 used liquid-based products and 7 used heated tobacco products. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test, which measures odor threshold, discrimination, and identification scores. The combined threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score was used to quantify overall olfactory performance. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional smokers exhibited the lowest olfactory performance, with significantly reduced TDI, threshold, and identification scores compared with both e-cigarette users and nonsmokers (P<0.05). E-cigarette users demonstrated significantly better olfactory scores than traditional smokers but poorer performance than nonsmokers, although the difference between e-cigarette users and nonsmokers was not statistically significant (P=0.100). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of odor discrimination scores. E-cigarette use was associated with less severe olfactory impairment than traditional smoking, but still showed a trend toward reduced function compared with nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while e-cigarettes may be less detrimental to olfaction than traditional cigarettes, they are not without risk. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on the olfactory system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use on olfactory function and compare the outcomes with traditional cigarette smokers and nonsmokers.

Methods: Participants were equally divided into 3 main groups (n=40 each): electronic cigarette users, traditional cigarette smokers, and nonsmokers. Among the e-cigarette users, 33 used liquid-based products and 7 used heated tobacco products. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test, which measures odor threshold, discrimination, and identification scores. The combined threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score was used to quantify overall olfactory performance. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests.

Results: Traditional smokers exhibited the lowest olfactory performance, with significantly reduced TDI, threshold, and identification scores compared with both e-cigarette users and nonsmokers (P<0.05). E-cigarette users demonstrated significantly better olfactory scores than traditional smokers but poorer performance than nonsmokers, although the difference between e-cigarette users and nonsmokers was not statistically significant (P=0.100). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of odor discrimination scores. E-cigarette use was associated with less severe olfactory impairment than traditional smoking, but still showed a trend toward reduced function compared with nonsmokers.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while e-cigarettes may be less detrimental to olfaction than traditional cigarettes, they are not without risk. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on the olfactory system.

电子烟对嗅觉的影响:与传统香烟的比较分析。
背景:本研究旨在评估使用电子烟对嗅觉功能的影响,并将其与传统吸烟者和非吸烟者的结果进行比较。方法:参与者平均分为3个主要组(n=40):电子烟使用者、传统吸烟者和不吸烟者。在电子烟使用者中,33人使用液体烟草产品,7人使用加热烟草产品。使用嗅探棒扩展测试评估嗅觉功能,该测试测量气味阈值,辨别和识别分数。阈值-鉴别-识别(TDI)组合评分用于量化整体嗅觉性能。统计分析采用单因素方差分析,然后进行Tukey事后检验。结果:与电子烟使用者和非吸烟者相比,传统吸烟者的嗅觉表现最低,TDI、阈值和识别分数显著降低(结论:这些发现表明,尽管电子烟对嗅觉的危害可能比传统香烟小,但它们并非没有风险。需要进一步的纵向研究来评估电子烟使用对嗅觉系统的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信