Balancing the (uncertainty) budget-postmortem toxicology laboratory conformance to ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Joseph H Kahl, Diane M Moore
{"title":"Balancing the (uncertainty) budget-postmortem toxicology laboratory conformance to ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology.","authors":"Joseph H Kahl, Diane M Moore","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In postmortem forensic toxicology, the accuracy and reliability of toxicological results are critical to the medicolegal death investigation process. ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology establishes the minimum requirements for evaluating measurement uncertainty (MU) in quantitative methods utilized in forensic toxicology. Accurate evaluation of MU increases confidence in results, supports scientific rigor, enables inter-laboratory comparability, and ensures legal defensibility. Using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 8-step procedure described in ANSI/ASB Standard 056, postmortem forensic toxicology laboratories can develop customized, flexible MU budget templates that accommodate a variety of analytical workflows and sample preparation techniques commonly used in the field. This manuscript highlights the use of a template that is adaptable to both routine quantitative workflows and those employing method of standard addition, providing example MU calculations for each. By aligning laboratory practices with the NIST 8-step procedure, as well as integrating accreditation requirements and published ANSI/ASB Standards into their quality management system, laboratories enhance the accuracy and reliability of their toxicological results. Adhering to ANSI/ASB Standard 056 ensures that the inherent variability in postmortem toxicological analyses is appropriately assessed and managed in a manner consistent with best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In postmortem forensic toxicology, the accuracy and reliability of toxicological results are critical to the medicolegal death investigation process. ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology establishes the minimum requirements for evaluating measurement uncertainty (MU) in quantitative methods utilized in forensic toxicology. Accurate evaluation of MU increases confidence in results, supports scientific rigor, enables inter-laboratory comparability, and ensures legal defensibility. Using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 8-step procedure described in ANSI/ASB Standard 056, postmortem forensic toxicology laboratories can develop customized, flexible MU budget templates that accommodate a variety of analytical workflows and sample preparation techniques commonly used in the field. This manuscript highlights the use of a template that is adaptable to both routine quantitative workflows and those employing method of standard addition, providing example MU calculations for each. By aligning laboratory practices with the NIST 8-step procedure, as well as integrating accreditation requirements and published ANSI/ASB Standards into their quality management system, laboratories enhance the accuracy and reliability of their toxicological results. Adhering to ANSI/ASB Standard 056 ensures that the inherent variability in postmortem toxicological analyses is appropriately assessed and managed in a manner consistent with best practices.

平衡(不确定度)预算-尸检毒理学实验室符合ANSI/ASB标准056:法医毒理学测量不确定度评估标准。
在死后法医毒理学中,毒理学结果的准确性和可靠性对法医死亡调查过程至关重要。ANSI/ASB标准056:法医毒理学测量不确定度评估标准建立了法医毒理学中使用的定量方法评估测量不确定度(MU)的最低要求。对MU的准确评估增加了对结果的信心,支持了科学的严谨性,实现了实验室间的可比性,并确保了法律的可辩护性。使用美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)在ANSI/ASB标准056中描述的8步程序,死后法医毒理学实验室可以开发定制的、灵活的MU预算模板,以适应各种分析工作流程和现场常用的样品制备技术。本文强调了模板的使用,该模板适用于常规定量工作流程和采用标准加法方法的工作流程,并为每种方法提供了示例MU计算。通过将实验室实践与NIST 8步程序相结合,以及将认证要求和已发布的ANSI/ASB标准整合到其质量管理体系中,实验室提高了毒理学结果的准确性和可靠性。遵守ANSI/ASB标准056确保死后毒理学分析的内在变异性得到适当的评估,并以与最佳实践一致的方式进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信