Single versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Severe Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVI: Insights from The Hostile Registry.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mattia Galli, Roberto Nerla, Fausto Castriota, Francesco Saia, Won-Keun Kim, Alessandro Iadanza, Ole De Backer, Francesco Burzotta, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Thomas Pilgrim, Giuseppe Musumeci, Max M Meertens, Michael Joner, Francesco Meucci, Stefan Toggweiler, Luca Testa, Sergio Berti, Matteo Montorfano, Daniel Braun, Marco De Carlo, Marco Barbanti, Giulio Stefanini, Georg Nickenig, Tommaso Piva, Azeem Latib, Italo Porto, Ran Kornowski, Antonio L Bartorelli, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Tullio Palmerini
{"title":"Single versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Severe Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVI: Insights from The Hostile Registry.","authors":"Mattia Galli, Roberto Nerla, Fausto Castriota, Francesco Saia, Won-Keun Kim, Alessandro Iadanza, Ole De Backer, Francesco Burzotta, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Thomas Pilgrim, Giuseppe Musumeci, Max M Meertens, Michael Joner, Francesco Meucci, Stefan Toggweiler, Luca Testa, Sergio Berti, Matteo Montorfano, Daniel Braun, Marco De Carlo, Marco Barbanti, Giulio Stefanini, Georg Nickenig, Tommaso Piva, Azeem Latib, Italo Porto, Ran Kornowski, Antonio L Bartorelli, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Tullio Palmerini","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) has been shown to be a safer alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients without atrial fibrillation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, antithrombotic therapy for TAVI patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains an underexplored area. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of SAPT and DAPT in this high-risk patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The HOSTILE registry was a multicenter, international, observational study including 1,707 consecutive patients with hostile femoral access undergoing TAVI in 28 international centers. Among 573 patients without atrial fibrillation treated through transfemoral or non-thoracic alternative approach, 144 received SAPT and 429 DAPT after TAVI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the propensity-adjusted rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary safety endpoint was the propensity-adjusted rate of major bleeding. Outcomes were reported at 30 days and 12 months. DAPT was associated with a non-significant reduction in MACE at 30 days (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.25-2.18; p=0.59) and at 12 months (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.35-2.24; p=0.80) compared to SAPT, but with a significant interaction between antiplatelet strategy and PAD severity (p=0.01), suggesting a greater benefit of DAPT in patients with a high PAD severity. DAPT was associated with reduced all-cause death at 12 months (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.47; p<0.001) but not at 30 days (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-1.22; p=0.09) compared with SAPT. There was no difference in major bleeding at 30 days (p=0.13) or 12 months (p=0.10) between groups. There were no differences between groups in any bleeding at 30 days (p=0.16) or 12 months (p=0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In TAVI patients with severe PAD, DAPT was associated with a trend toward improved outcomes compared with SAPT, particularly in those with higher PAD severity. These findings, including the observed reduction in 1-year mortality with DAPT, warrant further investigation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) has been shown to be a safer alternative to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients without atrial fibrillation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, antithrombotic therapy for TAVI patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains an underexplored area. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of SAPT and DAPT in this high-risk patient population.

Methods and results: The HOSTILE registry was a multicenter, international, observational study including 1,707 consecutive patients with hostile femoral access undergoing TAVI in 28 international centers. Among 573 patients without atrial fibrillation treated through transfemoral or non-thoracic alternative approach, 144 received SAPT and 429 DAPT after TAVI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the propensity-adjusted rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary safety endpoint was the propensity-adjusted rate of major bleeding. Outcomes were reported at 30 days and 12 months. DAPT was associated with a non-significant reduction in MACE at 30 days (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.25-2.18; p=0.59) and at 12 months (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.35-2.24; p=0.80) compared to SAPT, but with a significant interaction between antiplatelet strategy and PAD severity (p=0.01), suggesting a greater benefit of DAPT in patients with a high PAD severity. DAPT was associated with reduced all-cause death at 12 months (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.47; p<0.001) but not at 30 days (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-1.22; p=0.09) compared with SAPT. There was no difference in major bleeding at 30 days (p=0.13) or 12 months (p=0.10) between groups. There were no differences between groups in any bleeding at 30 days (p=0.16) or 12 months (p=0.17).

Conclusions: In TAVI patients with severe PAD, DAPT was associated with a trend toward improved outcomes compared with SAPT, particularly in those with higher PAD severity. These findings, including the observed reduction in 1-year mortality with DAPT, warrant further investigation in prospective studies.

严重外周动脉疾病TAVI患者单抗与双抗血小板治疗:来自敌对登记的见解
目的:对于接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的无房颤患者,单次抗血小板治疗(SAPT)已被证明是比双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)更安全的选择。然而,TAVI患者合并严重外周动脉疾病(PAD)的抗血栓治疗仍然是一个未被充分探索的领域。本研究旨在评估和比较SAPT和DAPT在这一高危患者群体中的效果。方法和结果:HOSTILE注册是一项多中心、国际的观察性研究,包括在28个国际中心的1,707例连续的不良股骨通路接受TAVI的患者。在573例经股动脉或非胸椎替代入路治疗的无房颤患者中,144例在TAVI后接受SAPT治疗,429例接受DAPT治疗。主要疗效终点是经倾向调整的主要心血管不良事件发生率(MACE),即心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的综合发生率。主要安全终点是经倾向调整的大出血率。在30天和12个月时报告结果。DAPT与30天MACE的无显著降低相关(HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.25-2.18;p=0.59)和12个月时(HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.35-2.24;p=0.80),但抗血小板策略与PAD严重程度之间存在显著的相互作用(p=0.01),表明DAPT对PAD严重程度高的患者有更大的益处。DAPT与12个月时全因死亡率降低相关(HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10-0.47;结论:在伴有严重PAD的TAVI患者中,与SAPT相比,DAPT与改善预后的趋势相关,特别是在PAD严重程度较高的患者中。这些发现,包括观察到的DAPT 1年死亡率的降低,值得在前瞻性研究中进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
14.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field. While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信