Effectiveness of fMRI-based Neurofeedback Therapy on Depression: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-08-31 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.9758/cpn.25.1295
Ali Khaleghi, Hannaneh Samiei, Hadi Zarafshan, Shahab Alaedin Baloochi, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi
{"title":"Effectiveness of fMRI-based Neurofeedback Therapy on Depression: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ali Khaleghi, Hannaneh Samiei, Hadi Zarafshan, Shahab Alaedin Baloochi, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi","doi":"10.9758/cpn.25.1295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review explores the efficacy of fMRI-based neurofeedback as an alternative treatment for individuals with depression who do not respond well to traditional therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search across several databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) identified 649 articles related to neurofeedback and depression, ultimately including 26 studies after eligibility assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of these studies, comprising both open-label and randomized controlled trials, reported significant reductions in depressive symptoms following neurofeedback interventions, which primarily targeted amygdala activity. Eighteen studies showed moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen's d values from 0.38 to 1.50) on validated depression measures. Notably, neurobiological changes were observed, including increased Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) activity and connectivity in emotion regulation regions such as the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Some studies indicated sustained symptom improvements, with over 75% of patients applying learned strategies in daily life. However, methodological limitations and a moderate to high risk of bias were noted in several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>fMRI-based neurofeedback presents a promising adjunctive therapy for depression, especially for patients who are resistant to standard treatments. Although current evidence shows positive effects on neural function and clinical outcomes, addressing methodological issues and standardizing study designs is essential. Future research should emphasize larger sample sizes and long-term efficacy while enhancing accessibility and cost-effectiveness in diverse clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"23 3","pages":"337-355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.25.1295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review explores the efficacy of fMRI-based neurofeedback as an alternative treatment for individuals with depression who do not respond well to traditional therapies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search across several databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) identified 649 articles related to neurofeedback and depression, ultimately including 26 studies after eligibility assessments.

Results: The majority of these studies, comprising both open-label and randomized controlled trials, reported significant reductions in depressive symptoms following neurofeedback interventions, which primarily targeted amygdala activity. Eighteen studies showed moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen's d values from 0.38 to 1.50) on validated depression measures. Notably, neurobiological changes were observed, including increased Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) activity and connectivity in emotion regulation regions such as the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Some studies indicated sustained symptom improvements, with over 75% of patients applying learned strategies in daily life. However, methodological limitations and a moderate to high risk of bias were noted in several studies.

Conclusion: fMRI-based neurofeedback presents a promising adjunctive therapy for depression, especially for patients who are resistant to standard treatments. Although current evidence shows positive effects on neural function and clinical outcomes, addressing methodological issues and standardizing study designs is essential. Future research should emphasize larger sample sizes and long-term efficacy while enhancing accessibility and cost-effectiveness in diverse clinical environments.

基于fmri的神经反馈治疗抑郁症的有效性:一项系统综述。
目的:本系统综述探讨了基于fmri的神经反馈作为对传统疗法反应不佳的抑郁症患者的替代疗法的疗效。方法:在多个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、ProQuest、Cochrane Library和b谷歌Scholar)中进行综合文献检索,确定了649篇与神经反馈和抑郁症相关的文章,最终包括26项经过资格评估的研究。结果:大多数研究,包括开放标签和随机对照试验,报告了主要针对杏仁核活动的神经反馈干预后抑郁症状的显著减少。18项研究显示,在有效的抑郁措施上,有中等到较大的效应(科恩d值从0.38到1.50)。值得注意的是,观察到神经生物学的变化,包括血氧水平依赖性(BOLD)活动的增加和杏仁核和前额叶皮质等情绪调节区域的连通性。一些研究表明持续的症状改善,超过75%的患者在日常生活中应用学习策略。然而,在一些研究中发现了方法学上的局限性和中度到高度偏倚的风险。结论:基于fmri的神经反馈是一种很有前途的抑郁症辅助治疗方法,特别是对那些对标准治疗有抵抗力的患者。虽然目前的证据显示神经功能和临床结果的积极作用,解决方法学问题和标准化的研究设计是必不可少的。未来的研究应强调更大的样本量和长期疗效,同时在不同的临床环境中提高可及性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信