A Misinterpretable Band on Urine Protein Electrophoresis in Hematuric Patients.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sang Mook Kim, Jae Hee Lee, Ji Yeon Ham, Nan Young Lee, Kyung Eun Song
{"title":"A Misinterpretable Band on Urine Protein Electrophoresis in Hematuric Patients.","authors":"Sang Mook Kim, Jae Hee Lee, Ji Yeon Ham, Nan Young Lee, Kyung Eun Song","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine protein electrophoresis (PEP) is widely employed to detect proteinuria and monoclonal protein (M protein), which is important for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma. However, the appearance of unusual bands can confound the interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We described two clinical cases in which a distinct beta-region band in urine PEP associated with hematuria. To investigate this phenomenon, we conducted an experiment by adding both lysed and non-lysed red blood cells (RBCs) to normal urine specimens and then performed urine PEP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both of our cases, the beta-region band disappeared after hematuria improved. In the experimental setup, the group with RBC lysis at counts above 500/µL produced a marked band in the beta region without gross hematuria, whereas the group with non-lysed RBCs required much higher concentrations to generate faint bands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that hematuria, particularly when red blood cells undergo lysis, can produce a distinct band in the beta region on urine PEP that may be misinterpreted as a monoclonal protein. Careful correlation with urinalysis results is therefore crucial to prevent misdiagnosis, especially in patients with microscopic hematuria.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"71 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urine protein electrophoresis (PEP) is widely employed to detect proteinuria and monoclonal protein (M protein), which is important for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma. However, the appearance of unusual bands can confound the interpretation.

Methods: We described two clinical cases in which a distinct beta-region band in urine PEP associated with hematuria. To investigate this phenomenon, we conducted an experiment by adding both lysed and non-lysed red blood cells (RBCs) to normal urine specimens and then performed urine PEP.

Results: In both of our cases, the beta-region band disappeared after hematuria improved. In the experimental setup, the group with RBC lysis at counts above 500/µL produced a marked band in the beta region without gross hematuria, whereas the group with non-lysed RBCs required much higher concentrations to generate faint bands.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that hematuria, particularly when red blood cells undergo lysis, can produce a distinct band in the beta region on urine PEP that may be misinterpreted as a monoclonal protein. Careful correlation with urinalysis results is therefore crucial to prevent misdiagnosis, especially in patients with microscopic hematuria.

血尿患者尿蛋白电泳的错误解释带。
背景:尿蛋白电泳(PEP)广泛应用于蛋白尿和单克隆蛋白(M蛋白)的检测,对多发性骨髓瘤的诊断和监测具有重要意义。然而,不寻常波段的出现可能会混淆解释。方法:我们描述了两例临床病例,其中尿PEP中明显的β区带与血尿有关。为了研究这一现象,我们进行了一项实验,将溶解和未溶解的红细胞(rbc)添加到正常尿液标本中,然后进行尿液PEP。结果:两例患者血尿改善后β区带均消失。在实验设置中,红细胞溶解计数超过500/µL的组在β区产生明显的条带,没有明显的血尿,而红细胞未溶解的组需要更高的浓度才能产生微弱的条带。结论:我们的研究结果表明,血尿,特别是当红细胞发生裂解时,可以在尿PEP的β区域产生明显的条带,可能被误解为单克隆蛋白。因此,与尿液分析结果的仔细相关性对于防止误诊至关重要,特别是在显微镜下血尿患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信