Clinical experience and outcomes of post chemotherapy midline extraperitoneal approach to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Basil Razi, James Kovacic, Ankur Dhar, Andrew Shepherd, Venu Chalasani, Matthew Winter
{"title":"Clinical experience and outcomes of post chemotherapy midline extraperitoneal approach to retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.","authors":"Basil Razi, James Kovacic, Ankur Dhar, Andrew Shepherd, Venu Chalasani, Matthew Winter","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01853-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To detail the outcomes of an open midline extraperitoneal (midline EP) approach to post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic testicular cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed our prospectively maintained operative database from April 2020 to February 2023 for cases of midline EP approach to PC-RPLND, identifying a total of 11 patients across two hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Demographic and perioperative data was obtained from electronic medical records, including preoperative factors such as cancer staging and preoperative treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients were included in this study. The median age was 37 years with a median ASA grade of 3. There were a total of six left-sided and five right-sided cases. A modified template was used in eight cases, and a bilateral template was used in three. Tumour staging ranged from Stage IIA- IIIB, with a median maximal retroperitoneal tumour size post chemotherapy of 4.2 cm. Preoperative histology identified 4 cases of seminoma and 7 cases of nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT). The median length of the procedure was 300 min, blood loss was 300mL, length of stay was 5 days, and post-operative days until bowel opening was 2 days. The median lymph node yield was 18, with active malignancy identified in five cases. There were four early complications and no late complications. 91% of the patients had preserved ejaculatory function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The open midline EP approach to PC-RPLND has demonstrated acceptable perioperative outcomes compared to other open surgical approaches, enabling surgeons to complete complex cases. Therefore, the midline EP approach should be considered when performing PC-RPLND.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01853-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To detail the outcomes of an open midline extraperitoneal (midline EP) approach to post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic testicular cancer.

Methods: We analysed our prospectively maintained operative database from April 2020 to February 2023 for cases of midline EP approach to PC-RPLND, identifying a total of 11 patients across two hospitals in Sydney, Australia. Demographic and perioperative data was obtained from electronic medical records, including preoperative factors such as cancer staging and preoperative treatment.

Results: Eleven patients were included in this study. The median age was 37 years with a median ASA grade of 3. There were a total of six left-sided and five right-sided cases. A modified template was used in eight cases, and a bilateral template was used in three. Tumour staging ranged from Stage IIA- IIIB, with a median maximal retroperitoneal tumour size post chemotherapy of 4.2 cm. Preoperative histology identified 4 cases of seminoma and 7 cases of nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT). The median length of the procedure was 300 min, blood loss was 300mL, length of stay was 5 days, and post-operative days until bowel opening was 2 days. The median lymph node yield was 18, with active malignancy identified in five cases. There were four early complications and no late complications. 91% of the patients had preserved ejaculatory function.

Conclusions: The open midline EP approach to PC-RPLND has demonstrated acceptable perioperative outcomes compared to other open surgical approaches, enabling surgeons to complete complex cases. Therefore, the midline EP approach should be considered when performing PC-RPLND.

化疗后中线腹膜外入路腹膜后淋巴结清扫的临床经验及结果。
背景:详细介绍转移性睾丸癌化疗后腹膜后淋巴结清扫(PC-RPLND)的开放式中线腹腔外(midline EP)入路的结果。方法:我们分析了我们从2020年4月至2023年2月前瞻性维护的手术数据库,其中包括中线EP入路治疗PC-RPLND的病例,共确定了澳大利亚悉尼两家医院的11例患者。从电子病历中获得人口统计学和围手术期数据,包括术前因素,如癌症分期和术前治疗。结果:11例患者纳入本研究。中位年龄为37岁,中位ASA分级为3级。总共有6个左侧病例和5个右侧病例。8例采用改良模板,3例采用双侧模板。肿瘤分期为IIA- IIIB期,化疗后腹膜后肿瘤中位最大大小为4.2 cm。术前组织学发现精原细胞瘤4例,非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞瘤7例。手术中位时间为300分钟,出血量为300mL,住院时间为5天,术后至肠开放时间为2天。中位淋巴结为18例,其中5例为活动性恶性肿瘤。早期并发症4例,晚期无并发症。91%的患者保留射精功能。结论:与其他开放手术入路相比,开放式中线EP入路治疗PC-RPLND的围手术期结果可接受,使外科医生能够完成复杂的病例。因此,在执行PC-RPLND时应考虑中线EP方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信