Lili Guo, Kevin Carleton, Yong Jiang, Christopher Ehlinger
{"title":"Impact of drug concentration and ADA assay drug tolerance on the assessment and correlation of titer and signal to noise.","authors":"Lili Guo, Kevin Carleton, Yong Jiang, Christopher Ehlinger","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2529146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The three-tiered testing strategy for an anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay is a common practice for assessing the immunogenicity to therapeutic products. Efforts to streamline the ADA testing process led to proposals of using signal to noise (<i>S/N</i>) as a substitute for titer when determining ADA magnitude. This study aims to identify the critical factors that may influence the correlation of <i>S/N</i> and titer.</p><p><strong>Method/result: </strong>Experimental and clinical ADA datasets were examined to assess how drug concentration and the assay drug tolerance affect the measurement and correlation of <i>S/N</i> and titer. Under various experimental conditions the influence of drug on titer was minimal across a range of drug concentrations. However, drug presence affected the <i>S/N</i>, particularly when drug concentrations approached the assay drug tolerance. Clinical ADA datasets showed a moderate to strong correlation between <i>S/N</i> and titer, demonstrating similar patterns of drug impact on both measurements, as observed in the experimental data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of drug in clinical samples and the drug tolerance of the ADA assay simultaneously influence the measurement and correlation of <i>S/N</i> and titer. The fold difference between drug tolerance and the maximum drug concentration in samples is a key factor in determining this correlation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"787-793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2529146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: The three-tiered testing strategy for an anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay is a common practice for assessing the immunogenicity to therapeutic products. Efforts to streamline the ADA testing process led to proposals of using signal to noise (S/N) as a substitute for titer when determining ADA magnitude. This study aims to identify the critical factors that may influence the correlation of S/N and titer.
Method/result: Experimental and clinical ADA datasets were examined to assess how drug concentration and the assay drug tolerance affect the measurement and correlation of S/N and titer. Under various experimental conditions the influence of drug on titer was minimal across a range of drug concentrations. However, drug presence affected the S/N, particularly when drug concentrations approached the assay drug tolerance. Clinical ADA datasets showed a moderate to strong correlation between S/N and titer, demonstrating similar patterns of drug impact on both measurements, as observed in the experimental data.
Conclusion: The presence of drug in clinical samples and the drug tolerance of the ADA assay simultaneously influence the measurement and correlation of S/N and titer. The fold difference between drug tolerance and the maximum drug concentration in samples is a key factor in determining this correlation.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.