Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: findings from a mixed-methods study in a developing country.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Noha Ali, Ranim Hamouda, Rana Tarek, Menna Abdelhamid, Abdullah Lashin, Rania Hassan, Rania Gamal, Mourad Elfaham, Aya Attia, Ahmed Abdelaleem, Noha Sakna, Amgad Gamal, Sally Aboelenin, Rahma AbdelHafez, Sara Abdelkader, Ashraf Nabhan
{"title":"Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines: findings from a mixed-methods study in a developing country.","authors":"Noha Ali, Ranim Hamouda, Rana Tarek, Menna Abdelhamid, Abdullah Lashin, Rania Hassan, Rania Gamal, Mourad Elfaham, Aya Attia, Ahmed Abdelaleem, Noha Sakna, Amgad Gamal, Sally Aboelenin, Rahma AbdelHafez, Sara Abdelkader, Ashraf Nabhan","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01607-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The effectiveness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the risk of post-operative infectious morbidity, depends on its appropriate use. We aimed to assess adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines and to explore the factors contributing to non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study comprised a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis. The cross-sectional survey included all surgical procedures performed in Ain Shams University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from November 1 2024 to December 31 2024. Trained medical interns collected routine data in real-time in the operative theater and in the wards by observing and documenting three key variables namely the antibiotic prescribed, timing of administration, and the duration of use. The overall adherence rate was calculated as the proportion of cases meeting all three criteria. The survey was followed by a qualitative research through synchronous online focus group of eight participants. Following transcription of the audio-recorded discussion, three researchers used a deductive approach to content analysis of the focus group discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and eighty surgical procedures were analyzed, with cesarean sections accounting for 48.6% (136/280). Full adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines was observed in 0% of cases. The appropriate antibiotic was prescribed in 62.5% (175/280) of procedures. Timely administration within the recommended 60-minute pre-incision window occurred in 38.2% (107/280). In contrast, 61.4% (172/280) of procedures had delayed antibiotic administration post-incision. The recommended single-dose or ≤ 24-hour regimen was administered in only 6.1% (17/280), whereas 93.9% (263/280) had prolonged parenteral antibiotic use beyond 24 h, with 98.9% (277/280) transitioning to oral antibiotics upon discharge. Key barriers to adherence included knowledge gaps, workflow inefficiencies, inadequate monitoring, limited antibiotic availability, financial constraints, and weak enforcement of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines is high, particularly regarding timing and duration. Addressing systemic barriers and enforcing guideline compliance is essential to improving antibiotic stewardship in surgical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01607-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The effectiveness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the risk of post-operative infectious morbidity, depends on its appropriate use. We aimed to assess adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines and to explore the factors contributing to non-adherence.

Methods: This mixed-methods study comprised a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis. The cross-sectional survey included all surgical procedures performed in Ain Shams University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from November 1 2024 to December 31 2024. Trained medical interns collected routine data in real-time in the operative theater and in the wards by observing and documenting three key variables namely the antibiotic prescribed, timing of administration, and the duration of use. The overall adherence rate was calculated as the proportion of cases meeting all three criteria. The survey was followed by a qualitative research through synchronous online focus group of eight participants. Following transcription of the audio-recorded discussion, three researchers used a deductive approach to content analysis of the focus group discussion.

Results: Two hundred and eighty surgical procedures were analyzed, with cesarean sections accounting for 48.6% (136/280). Full adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines was observed in 0% of cases. The appropriate antibiotic was prescribed in 62.5% (175/280) of procedures. Timely administration within the recommended 60-minute pre-incision window occurred in 38.2% (107/280). In contrast, 61.4% (172/280) of procedures had delayed antibiotic administration post-incision. The recommended single-dose or ≤ 24-hour regimen was administered in only 6.1% (17/280), whereas 93.9% (263/280) had prolonged parenteral antibiotic use beyond 24 h, with 98.9% (277/280) transitioning to oral antibiotics upon discharge. Key barriers to adherence included knowledge gaps, workflow inefficiencies, inadequate monitoring, limited antibiotic availability, financial constraints, and weak enforcement of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.

Conclusions: Non-adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines is high, particularly regarding timing and duration. Addressing systemic barriers and enforcing guideline compliance is essential to improving antibiotic stewardship in surgical settings.

不遵守外科抗生素预防指南:来自发展中国家一项混合方法研究的结果。
目的:外科抗生素预防在降低术后感染发病率方面的有效性取决于其正确使用。我们的目的是评估手术抗生素预防指南的依从性,并探讨导致不依从性的因素。方法:混合方法研究包括横断面调查和定性分析。横断面调查包括2024年11月1日至2024年12月31日在艾因沙姆斯大学妇产科医院进行的所有外科手术。训练有素的医学实习生通过观察和记录三个关键变量,即抗生素处方、给药时间和使用时间,在手术室和病房实时收集常规数据。总体依从率计算为满足所有三个标准的病例的比例。调查之后,通过同步在线焦点小组对8名参与者进行定性研究。在对录音讨论进行转录后,三位研究人员使用演绎方法对焦点小组讨论进行内容分析。结果:共分析280种手术方式,其中剖宫产占48.6%(136/280)。0%的病例完全遵守手术抗生素预防指南。62.5%(175/280)的病例开了合适的抗生素。在建议的60分钟切开前窗口内及时给药的发生率为38.2%(107/280)。相比之下,61.4%(172/280)的手术在切口后延迟给药。仅6.1%(17/280)的患者采用推荐的单剂量或≤24小时方案,而93.9%(263/280)的患者延长了24小时以上的肠外抗生素使用时间,98.9%(277/280)的患者在出院后改用口服抗生素。坚持治疗的主要障碍包括知识差距、工作流程效率低下、监测不足、抗生素供应有限、财政限制以及手术抗生素预防指南执行不力。结论:不遵守外科抗生素预防指南的情况很高,特别是在时间和持续时间方面。解决系统性障碍和强制执行指南的遵守对于改善外科环境中的抗生素管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信