The Transdiagnostic Processes of Emotional Symptoms Scale (TPESS): Development of a Measure of Core Cognitive Risk to Emotional Disorders.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ryan Y Hong, Nur Hani Zainal, Kay Chan, Fennie C C Wong, Clarice W T Tay, Shenice W Q Long, Arunika Pillay, Jin Yi Koh, Janice Y Q Quek, Sophia K T Loh, Jin Nen Wong
{"title":"The Transdiagnostic Processes of Emotional Symptoms Scale (TPESS): Development of a Measure of Core Cognitive Risk to Emotional Disorders.","authors":"Ryan Y Hong, Nur Hani Zainal, Kay Chan, Fennie C C Wong, Clarice W T Tay, Shenice W Q Long, Arunika Pillay, Jin Yi Koh, Janice Y Q Quek, Sophia K T Loh, Jin Nen Wong","doi":"10.1177/10731911251348981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive processes are conceptualized as critical etiological factors in emotional disorders, and the transdiagnostic perspective highlights the value of investigating common cognitive risk mechanisms. We developed the Transdiagnostic Processes of Emotional Symptoms Scale (TPESS), a self-report questionnaire designed to assess a transdiagnostic cognitive risk factor. Across two studies, the TPESS was constructed and validated based on two Singaporean college student samples and a community sample from the United States (total <i>N</i> = 1,937). The TPESS exhibited measurement invariance across national samples, gender, and time. Evidence for reliability and validity for the TPESS was generally excellent, though discriminant validity in relation to closely aligned constructs was weaker in the U.S. sample. TPESS demonstrated incremental and unique predictive validity of various emotional symptoms and diagnoses, even after accounting for other risk factors (e.g., personality traits, emotion dysregulation). Taken together, TPESS is a promising instrument for assessing a transdiagnostic cognitive risk of emotional distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251348981"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251348981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive processes are conceptualized as critical etiological factors in emotional disorders, and the transdiagnostic perspective highlights the value of investigating common cognitive risk mechanisms. We developed the Transdiagnostic Processes of Emotional Symptoms Scale (TPESS), a self-report questionnaire designed to assess a transdiagnostic cognitive risk factor. Across two studies, the TPESS was constructed and validated based on two Singaporean college student samples and a community sample from the United States (total N = 1,937). The TPESS exhibited measurement invariance across national samples, gender, and time. Evidence for reliability and validity for the TPESS was generally excellent, though discriminant validity in relation to closely aligned constructs was weaker in the U.S. sample. TPESS demonstrated incremental and unique predictive validity of various emotional symptoms and diagnoses, even after accounting for other risk factors (e.g., personality traits, emotion dysregulation). Taken together, TPESS is a promising instrument for assessing a transdiagnostic cognitive risk of emotional distress.

情绪症状量表(TPESS)的跨诊断过程:开发一种衡量情绪障碍核心认知风险的方法。
认知过程被认为是情绪障碍的关键病因,而跨诊断的观点强调了研究常见认知风险机制的价值。我们开发了情绪症状跨诊断过程量表(TPESS),这是一份自我报告问卷,旨在评估跨诊断认知风险因素。在两项研究中,TPESS是基于两个新加坡大学生样本和一个来自美国的社区样本(总N = 1937)构建和验证的。TPESS在国家样本、性别和时间上表现出测量不变性。尽管在美国样本中,与紧密排列结构相关的判别效度较弱,但TPESS的信度和效度的证据总体上是优秀的。即使在考虑了其他风险因素(如人格特征、情绪失调)后,TPESS也显示出对各种情绪症状和诊断的增量和独特的预测有效性。综上所述,TPESS是一种很有前途的评估情绪困扰的跨诊断认知风险的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信