Evaluation of the Effects of Switching COPD Patients From LAMA/LABA Therapy to ICS/LAMA/LABA Therapy Using the Impulse Oscillation System (IOS) Capable of Separating Inspiratory and Expiratory Measurements

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yosuke Tanaka, Ken Okamura, Shota Kaburaki, Toru Tanaka, Akiko Yoshikawa, Ayumi Shimizu, Akihiko Miyanaga, Namiko Taniuchi, Koichiro Kamio, Kazuo Kasahara, Masahiro Seike, Mitsunori Hino
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effects of Switching COPD Patients From LAMA/LABA Therapy to ICS/LAMA/LABA Therapy Using the Impulse Oscillation System (IOS) Capable of Separating Inspiratory and Expiratory Measurements","authors":"Yosuke Tanaka,&nbsp;Ken Okamura,&nbsp;Shota Kaburaki,&nbsp;Toru Tanaka,&nbsp;Akiko Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Ayumi Shimizu,&nbsp;Akihiko Miyanaga,&nbsp;Namiko Taniuchi,&nbsp;Koichiro Kamio,&nbsp;Kazuo Kasahara,&nbsp;Masahiro Seike,&nbsp;Mitsunori Hino","doi":"10.1111/crj.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Noninvasive evaluation of airway conditions is considered useful in the management of COPD, although assessing airway remodeling remains difficult in routine clinical practice. The impulse oscillometry system used in this study allows separate analysis of inspiratory and expiratory phases, offering detailed insights into airway function. This study examined the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) on airway remodeling and assessed the utility of this system in COPD management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Stable COPD patients on LAMA/LABA for over a year were assessed by spirometry and impulse oscillometry at baseline and after 48 weeks of ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy. Symptoms, imaging, and blood tests were also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 52 patients (mean baseline %FEV1/predicted: 56.9% ± 22.1%), all had one to two moderate exacerbations in the past year despite LAMA/LABA therapy. Significant correlations were observed between spirometry and MostGraph (e.g., baseline FEV1 vs. R5: <i>r</i> = −0.54). Although spirometry showed no significant changes, Fres improved significantly (−2.11 ± 0.35, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), with reductions in both expiratory and inspiratory phases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Fres measured by MostGraph significantly improved after ICS addition, whereas no significant changes were observed in spirometry or resistance parameters. Fres also showed significant correlations with FEV1, suggesting that it may capture airway changes not detected by spirometry. These findings support further investigation into its role as a noninvasive marker in COPD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial: UMIN000040764 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042394)</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Noninvasive evaluation of airway conditions is considered useful in the management of COPD, although assessing airway remodeling remains difficult in routine clinical practice. The impulse oscillometry system used in this study allows separate analysis of inspiratory and expiratory phases, offering detailed insights into airway function. This study examined the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) on airway remodeling and assessed the utility of this system in COPD management.

Methods

Stable COPD patients on LAMA/LABA for over a year were assessed by spirometry and impulse oscillometry at baseline and after 48 weeks of ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy. Symptoms, imaging, and blood tests were also evaluated.

Results

Among 52 patients (mean baseline %FEV1/predicted: 56.9% ± 22.1%), all had one to two moderate exacerbations in the past year despite LAMA/LABA therapy. Significant correlations were observed between spirometry and MostGraph (e.g., baseline FEV1 vs. R5: r = −0.54). Although spirometry showed no significant changes, Fres improved significantly (−2.11 ± 0.35, p < 0.0001), with reductions in both expiratory and inspiratory phases.

Conclusions

Fres measured by MostGraph significantly improved after ICS addition, whereas no significant changes were observed in spirometry or resistance parameters. Fres also showed significant correlations with FEV1, suggesting that it may capture airway changes not detected by spirometry. These findings support further investigation into its role as a noninvasive marker in COPD.

Trial Registration

UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial: UMIN000040764 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042394)

Abstract Image

使用能够分离吸气和呼气测量的脉冲振荡系统(IOS)评估COPD患者从LAMA/LABA治疗转换为ICS/LAMA/LABA治疗的效果
尽管在常规临床实践中评估气道重塑仍然很困难,但无创气道状况评估被认为对COPD的治疗有用。本研究中使用的脉冲振荡测量系统可以对吸气和呼气相进行单独分析,从而提供对气道功能的详细了解。本研究探讨了吸入皮质类固醇(ICSs)对气道重塑的影响,并评估了该系统在COPD治疗中的效用。方法采用ICS/LAMA/LABA治疗1年以上的稳定期COPD患者,分别在基线和治疗48周后进行肺活量测定和脉冲振荡测定。还对症状、影像学和血液检查进行了评估。结果在52例患者中(平均基线%FEV1/预测:56.9%±22.1%),尽管进行了LAMA/LABA治疗,但在过去的一年中,所有患者均有1至2次中度加重。肺活量测定和MostGraph之间观察到显著相关性(例如,基线FEV1与R5: r = - 0.54)。虽然肺活量测定没有明显变化,但Fres明显改善(- 2.11±0.35,p < 0.0001),呼气期和吸气期均减少。结论加入ICS后,MostGraph测量Fres明显改善,肺活量和阻力参数无明显变化。Fres也显示出与FEV1的显著相关性,表明它可能捕捉到肺活量测定法未检测到的气道变化。这些发现支持进一步研究其作为COPD非侵入性标志物的作用。UMIN-CTR临床试验:UMIN000040764 (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000042394)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信