Traditional harvest systems as models for advancing understanding of dynamics and resilience in socio-ecological systems

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70349
Sara Souther, Diana Stuart, Clare Aslan
{"title":"Traditional harvest systems as models for advancing understanding of dynamics and resilience in socio-ecological systems","authors":"Sara Souther,&nbsp;Diana Stuart,&nbsp;Clare Aslan","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional harvest entails humans extracting and managing resources from intact, semi-natural ecosystems. As such, it is inherently comprised of close interactions between humans and ecosystems and may provide unique insight into socio-ecological systems. Traditional harvest is generally accompanied by traditional resource management and directly influences ecological community dynamics, species reproduction and distribution, and competitive interactions. Meanwhile, ecological processes, seasonality, and natural disturbances influence human behaviors, decision making, activities, and well-being. As a result of this tight coupling, traditional harvest systems have the potential to serve as important laboratories for the study of ecological community dynamics. Resilience science, in particular, may benefit from greater appreciation of traditional harvest, wherein thresholds and bidirectional feedbacks may be more easily detected and modeled than in more diffuse socio-ecological systems. Additionally, because traditional harvest links to cultural heritage and traditional ecological knowledge, a greater understanding of these systems may facilitate efforts to support marginalized communities and social equity. We here discuss the value of traditional harvest research for science and society, highlighting as a case study the traditional harvest of Emory oak acorns by Western Apache Tribal Nations. We argue that traditional harvest systems carry important heuristic value but are often assumed to be rare or declining and are therefore relatively neglected by researchers, yet their persistence in modern agriculture-dominated systems exemplifies resilience. As environmental change persists and natural systems near critical tipping points, understanding the role of humans in ecosystem resilience will be necessary to develop effective and sustainable management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional harvest entails humans extracting and managing resources from intact, semi-natural ecosystems. As such, it is inherently comprised of close interactions between humans and ecosystems and may provide unique insight into socio-ecological systems. Traditional harvest is generally accompanied by traditional resource management and directly influences ecological community dynamics, species reproduction and distribution, and competitive interactions. Meanwhile, ecological processes, seasonality, and natural disturbances influence human behaviors, decision making, activities, and well-being. As a result of this tight coupling, traditional harvest systems have the potential to serve as important laboratories for the study of ecological community dynamics. Resilience science, in particular, may benefit from greater appreciation of traditional harvest, wherein thresholds and bidirectional feedbacks may be more easily detected and modeled than in more diffuse socio-ecological systems. Additionally, because traditional harvest links to cultural heritage and traditional ecological knowledge, a greater understanding of these systems may facilitate efforts to support marginalized communities and social equity. We here discuss the value of traditional harvest research for science and society, highlighting as a case study the traditional harvest of Emory oak acorns by Western Apache Tribal Nations. We argue that traditional harvest systems carry important heuristic value but are often assumed to be rare or declining and are therefore relatively neglected by researchers, yet their persistence in modern agriculture-dominated systems exemplifies resilience. As environmental change persists and natural systems near critical tipping points, understanding the role of humans in ecosystem resilience will be necessary to develop effective and sustainable management.

Abstract Image

传统的收获系统作为促进对社会生态系统动态和恢复力理解的模型
传统的收获需要人类从完整的半自然生态系统中提取和管理资源。因此,它本质上是由人类与生态系统之间的密切相互作用组成的,并可能提供对社会生态系统的独特见解。传统收获通常伴随着传统的资源管理,直接影响生态群落动态、物种繁殖和分布以及竞争相互作用。同时,生态过程、季节性和自然干扰影响着人类的行为、决策、活动和福祉。由于这种紧密耦合,传统的收获系统具有作为研究生态群落动态的重要实验室的潜力。特别是复原力科学可能受益于对传统收获的更大赞赏,其中阈值和双向反馈可能比更分散的社会生态系统更容易检测和建模。此外,由于传统收获与文化遗产和传统生态知识有关,对这些系统的更深入了解可能有助于支持边缘化社区和社会公平。我们在这里讨论传统收获研究对科学和社会的价值,并以西部阿帕奇部落国家传统的埃默里橡树橡子收获为例进行了重点研究。我们认为,传统的收获系统具有重要的启发价值,但通常被认为是罕见的或衰落的,因此被研究人员相对忽视,然而,它们在现代农业主导的系统中的持续存在体现了弹性。随着环境的持续变化和自然系统接近临界点,了解人类在生态系统恢复力中的作用对于制定有效和可持续的管理是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信