Shared Decision-Making Behavior in Surgery Among Early Breast Cancer Patients and Associated Factors Using COM-B Model: A Latent Profile Analysis

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Wei Zhang, Ye Weng, Xiaoyang Zhang, Haiyan Shen, Xiaochun Li, Yue Liu, Wei Liu, Han Xiao, Haihong Jing, Chao Xu, Han Tang
{"title":"Shared Decision-Making Behavior in Surgery Among Early Breast Cancer Patients and Associated Factors Using COM-B Model: A Latent Profile Analysis","authors":"Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Ye Weng,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Zhang,&nbsp;Haiyan Shen,&nbsp;Xiaochun Li,&nbsp;Yue Liu,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Han Xiao,&nbsp;Haihong Jing,&nbsp;Chao Xu,&nbsp;Han Tang","doi":"10.1155/jonm/2347796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Breast cancer patients often face the choice between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy. From a shared decision-making perspective, it is crucial for patients to actively engage in the decision-making process, taking into account their own preferences and values. This approach can enhance treatment satisfaction and support the principles of precision nursing.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the level and classification of shared decision-making behavior in surgery, along with the influence of participation competence, perceived social support, and self-care self-efficacy, guided by the “Capacity, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior” model.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals in China from January 2021 to March 2022. The survey tools included self-designed demographic and clinical instrument, the Participation in Treatment Decision-Making Scale for cancer patients (PTDMS), the Participation Competence Scale (PCS), the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), and the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (SUPPH). Latent profile analysis was employed to assess the shared decision-making behavior in surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify factors associated with the identified subtypes.</p>\n <p><b>Result:</b> A total of 840 participants were ultimately analyzed. The best-fitting model identified three classes: active participation group (55.7%), moderate participation group (21.7%), and low participation group (22.6%). Logistic regression indicated that age, number of children, educational level, family income, employment status, cancer stage, type of surgery, participation competence, perceived social support, and self-care self-efficacy were main associated factors (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The performance of shared decision-making behaviors in surgery needs improvement. This study may help nurses identify targeted intervention populations who are older, have more than three children, have a higher education level, have a lower family income, are employed, are at an advanced cancer stage, and are opting for mastectomy. It also emphasizes the importance of participation competence, social support, and self-care self-efficacy when designing intervention content.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/2347796","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/2347796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer patients often face the choice between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy. From a shared decision-making perspective, it is crucial for patients to actively engage in the decision-making process, taking into account their own preferences and values. This approach can enhance treatment satisfaction and support the principles of precision nursing.

Objective: To evaluate the level and classification of shared decision-making behavior in surgery, along with the influence of participation competence, perceived social support, and self-care self-efficacy, guided by the “Capacity, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior” model.

Method: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals in China from January 2021 to March 2022. The survey tools included self-designed demographic and clinical instrument, the Participation in Treatment Decision-Making Scale for cancer patients (PTDMS), the Participation Competence Scale (PCS), the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), and the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (SUPPH). Latent profile analysis was employed to assess the shared decision-making behavior in surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify factors associated with the identified subtypes.

Result: A total of 840 participants were ultimately analyzed. The best-fitting model identified three classes: active participation group (55.7%), moderate participation group (21.7%), and low participation group (22.6%). Logistic regression indicated that age, number of children, educational level, family income, employment status, cancer stage, type of surgery, participation competence, perceived social support, and self-care self-efficacy were main associated factors (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The performance of shared decision-making behaviors in surgery needs improvement. This study may help nurses identify targeted intervention populations who are older, have more than three children, have a higher education level, have a lower family income, are employed, are at an advanced cancer stage, and are opting for mastectomy. It also emphasizes the importance of participation competence, social support, and self-care self-efficacy when designing intervention content.

Abstract Image

基于COM-B模型的早期乳腺癌手术患者共同决策行为及相关因素分析
背景:乳腺癌患者经常面临保乳手术和乳房切除术的选择。从共同决策的角度来看,患者积极参与决策过程,考虑到自己的偏好和价值观是至关重要的。该方法可提高治疗满意度,支持精准护理原则。目的:以“能力、机会、动机-行为”模型为指导,评价外科共同决策行为的水平和分类,以及参与能力、感知社会支持和自我护理自我效能感的影响。方法:于2021年1月至2022年3月在中国三家医院进行多中心横断面研究。调查工具包括自行设计的人口学和临床工具、癌症患者参与治疗决策量表(PTDMS)、参与能力量表(PCS)、感知社会支持量表(PSSS)和人们促进健康的策略(SUPPH)。采用隐型分析评估手术中的共同决策行为。应用多元逻辑回归来确定与所确定亚型相关的因素。结果:最终共分析了840名参与者。最佳拟合模型确定了三个类别:积极参与组(55.7%),中度参与组(21.7%)和低参与组(22.6%)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、子女数量、受教育程度、家庭收入、就业状况、肿瘤分期、手术类型、参与能力、感知社会支持、自我护理效能感是主要影响因素(p <;0.05)。结论:共同决策行为在外科手术中的表现有待提高。这项研究可以帮助护士确定有针对性的干预人群,这些人群年龄较大,有三个以上的孩子,受教育程度较高,家庭收入较低,有工作,处于癌症晚期,并选择乳房切除术。在设计干预内容时,强调参与能力、社会支持和自我照顾效能感的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信