Association Between Prenatal Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Orofacial Clefts Among Newborns in New York State, Excluding New York City (2000–2019)
Douglas Done, Michele Herdt, Tabassum Z. Insaf, Beth Feingold, Akiko Hosler
{"title":"Association Between Prenatal Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Orofacial Clefts Among Newborns in New York State, Excluding New York City (2000–2019)","authors":"Douglas Done, Michele Herdt, Tabassum Z. Insaf, Beth Feingold, Akiko Hosler","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke is strongly associated with the development of orofacial clefts. Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) has many of the same toxic combustion byproducts as burning tobacco, such as benzene and PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and may therefore act through similar pathways to cause harm to developing fetuses. Since concentrations of TRAP are highest close to the roadway, they can be assessed using distance-weighted traffic density (DWTD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A case–control study of birthing parent–newborn pairs was conducted among children born between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, to people residing in New York State (NYS), excluding New York City. Cases of cleft lip alone, cleft palate alone, and cleft lip with cleft palate were identified from the NYS Birth Defects Registry. Orofacial clefts were also analyzed as an aggregated group. Controls without diagnosed major birth defects were randomly selected from hospital discharge records. DWTD measured in vehicles per day (VPD) was calculated from NYS Department of Transportation traffic data. A multivariate logistic regression model, adjusted for the birthing parent's age, race, ethnicity, and census tract-level disadvantage, was constructed to evaluate the association between orofacial clefts and DWTD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a statistically significant adjusted odds ratio (aOR) comparing the DWTD ≥ 500 VPD group to the DWTD reference group (< 500 VPD) found only among orofacial clefts as an aggregate group (aOR = 1.13 [1.04–1.22]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The current study, covering 20 years of case collection, generally supports the DWTD's potential risk for orofacial clefts. Larger observational studies are warranted to further investigate associations between DWTD and individual categories of orofacial clefts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"117 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke is strongly associated with the development of orofacial clefts. Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) has many of the same toxic combustion byproducts as burning tobacco, such as benzene and PM2.5, and may therefore act through similar pathways to cause harm to developing fetuses. Since concentrations of TRAP are highest close to the roadway, they can be assessed using distance-weighted traffic density (DWTD).
Methods
A case–control study of birthing parent–newborn pairs was conducted among children born between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, to people residing in New York State (NYS), excluding New York City. Cases of cleft lip alone, cleft palate alone, and cleft lip with cleft palate were identified from the NYS Birth Defects Registry. Orofacial clefts were also analyzed as an aggregated group. Controls without diagnosed major birth defects were randomly selected from hospital discharge records. DWTD measured in vehicles per day (VPD) was calculated from NYS Department of Transportation traffic data. A multivariate logistic regression model, adjusted for the birthing parent's age, race, ethnicity, and census tract-level disadvantage, was constructed to evaluate the association between orofacial clefts and DWTD.
Results
There was a statistically significant adjusted odds ratio (aOR) comparing the DWTD ≥ 500 VPD group to the DWTD reference group (< 500 VPD) found only among orofacial clefts as an aggregate group (aOR = 1.13 [1.04–1.22]).
Conclusions
The current study, covering 20 years of case collection, generally supports the DWTD's potential risk for orofacial clefts. Larger observational studies are warranted to further investigate associations between DWTD and individual categories of orofacial clefts.
期刊介绍:
The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks.
Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.