{"title":"Bias Correction of Terrestrial Water Availability: Comparison of Trend-Preserving Cumulative Distribution Function Matching Methods","authors":"Jingyi Li, Boqiang Qin","doi":"10.1002/asl.1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Terrestrial water availability, quantified by precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P−E), is essential in Earth's water cycle, whereas model simulation of P−E is still largely biased and requires a post-processing procedure. This study introduces the grid-by-grid cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching method to correct simulation bias in P−E, based on the ERA5-Land dataset and outputs from 13 selected CMIP6 global climate models. The CDF matching method has a particular advantage in preserving the trends simulated by laws of physics in climate models, and three (additive, multiplicative, and additive–multiplicative mixed) trend preservation strategies are compared in this study. The cross-validation from 1951 to 2014 indicates that all the trend preservation strategies effectively improve the simulated spatial characteristics of P−E with increased spatial correlation, enhanced sign agreement and reduced mean absolute error. Specifically, the additive strategy outperforms in improving the spatial similarity and accuracy of P−E in the humid region and global average, whereas the mixed strategy is the optimal in the hyper-arid, arid, and semi-arid regions. Furthermore, the mixed strategy has a significant advantage in preserving the signs of P−E across the globe. This study exhibits a computationally efficient statistical approach for bias correction of P−E simulation, and validates its flexible correction strategies regarding different terrestrial aridity conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50734,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Science Letters","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/asl.1312","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.1312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Terrestrial water availability, quantified by precipitation minus evapotranspiration (P−E), is essential in Earth's water cycle, whereas model simulation of P−E is still largely biased and requires a post-processing procedure. This study introduces the grid-by-grid cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching method to correct simulation bias in P−E, based on the ERA5-Land dataset and outputs from 13 selected CMIP6 global climate models. The CDF matching method has a particular advantage in preserving the trends simulated by laws of physics in climate models, and three (additive, multiplicative, and additive–multiplicative mixed) trend preservation strategies are compared in this study. The cross-validation from 1951 to 2014 indicates that all the trend preservation strategies effectively improve the simulated spatial characteristics of P−E with increased spatial correlation, enhanced sign agreement and reduced mean absolute error. Specifically, the additive strategy outperforms in improving the spatial similarity and accuracy of P−E in the humid region and global average, whereas the mixed strategy is the optimal in the hyper-arid, arid, and semi-arid regions. Furthermore, the mixed strategy has a significant advantage in preserving the signs of P−E across the globe. This study exhibits a computationally efficient statistical approach for bias correction of P−E simulation, and validates its flexible correction strategies regarding different terrestrial aridity conditions.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Science Letters (ASL) is a wholly Open Access electronic journal. Its aim is to provide a fully peer reviewed publication route for new shorter contributions in the field of atmospheric and closely related sciences. Through its ability to publish shorter contributions more rapidly than conventional journals, ASL offers a framework that promotes new understanding and creates scientific debate - providing a platform for discussing scientific issues and techniques.
We encourage the presentation of multi-disciplinary work and contributions that utilise ideas and techniques from parallel areas. We particularly welcome contributions that maximise the visualisation capabilities offered by a purely on-line journal. ASL welcomes papers in the fields of: Dynamical meteorology; Ocean-atmosphere systems; Climate change, variability and impacts; New or improved observations from instrumentation; Hydrometeorology; Numerical weather prediction; Data assimilation and ensemble forecasting; Physical processes of the atmosphere; Land surface-atmosphere systems.