The ‘Good Samaritan’: The effects of corporate conflict engagement on public satisfaction and their behavioral intentions

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Chiara Valentini , Hui Zhao , Juha Munnukka
{"title":"The ‘Good Samaritan’: The effects of corporate conflict engagement on public satisfaction and their behavioral intentions","authors":"Chiara Valentini ,&nbsp;Hui Zhao ,&nbsp;Juha Munnukka","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a time marked by rising geopolitical tensions and societal conflicts, the traditional corporate emphasis on maximizing shareholder value is increasingly evolving towards a more public-oriented approach that includes societal and ethical considerations. Should organizations invest in activities that are not their primary responsibilities? Based on conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations literature, this study examines different corporate actions undertaken during societal conflicts and how these affect public satisfaction and what effects these may have on three public relations outcomes: reputation, word-of-mouth, and financial support. Using an experimental design with the Finnish public in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, this study demonstrates that proactive corporate engagement in conflict mitigation has direct positive effects on financial support and positive word-of-mouth intentions, though not on reputation. However, when public satisfaction and corporate trust are considered, there are positive effects on reputation and word-of-mouth intentions, but not on financial support. Additionally, people’s ethical orientation and conflict severity perception play a role in moderating these effects. This study contributes to the existing literature in conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations in several ways. It enhances theory integration by combining multiple perspectives, providing a comprehensive understanding of societal conflicts and their effects. It contributes to research on societal conflicts by shedding some light into different types of corporate behaviors during societal conflicts and the mechanisms that affect public perceptions of such actions. And it empirically demonstrates that organizations can also gain some public relations outcomes from investing in positive corporate conflict engagement actions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102607"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a time marked by rising geopolitical tensions and societal conflicts, the traditional corporate emphasis on maximizing shareholder value is increasingly evolving towards a more public-oriented approach that includes societal and ethical considerations. Should organizations invest in activities that are not their primary responsibilities? Based on conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations literature, this study examines different corporate actions undertaken during societal conflicts and how these affect public satisfaction and what effects these may have on three public relations outcomes: reputation, word-of-mouth, and financial support. Using an experimental design with the Finnish public in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, this study demonstrates that proactive corporate engagement in conflict mitigation has direct positive effects on financial support and positive word-of-mouth intentions, though not on reputation. However, when public satisfaction and corporate trust are considered, there are positive effects on reputation and word-of-mouth intentions, but not on financial support. Additionally, people’s ethical orientation and conflict severity perception play a role in moderating these effects. This study contributes to the existing literature in conflict management, corporate social responsibility and public relations in several ways. It enhances theory integration by combining multiple perspectives, providing a comprehensive understanding of societal conflicts and their effects. It contributes to research on societal conflicts by shedding some light into different types of corporate behaviors during societal conflicts and the mechanisms that affect public perceptions of such actions. And it empirically demonstrates that organizations can also gain some public relations outcomes from investing in positive corporate conflict engagement actions.
“好撒玛利亚人”:企业冲突参与对公众满意度及其行为意图的影响
在地缘政治紧张局势和社会冲突不断加剧的时代,传统企业强调股东价值最大化的做法正日益演变为一种更面向公众的方法,其中包括社会和道德方面的考虑。组织应该投资于不是他们主要职责的活动吗?基于冲突管理、企业社会责任和公共关系文献,本研究考察了在社会冲突中采取的不同企业行动,以及这些行动如何影响公众满意度,以及这些行动对声誉、口碑和财务支持这三种公共关系结果的影响。本研究采用在俄乌冲突背景下的芬兰公众实验设计,表明企业积极参与缓解冲突对财政支持和积极的口碑意图有直接的积极影响,但对声誉没有影响。然而,当考虑公众满意度和企业信任时,对声誉和口碑意图有正向影响,而对资金支持没有正向影响。此外,人们的道德取向和冲突严重程度感知对这些影响起调节作用。本研究对冲突管理、企业社会责任和公共关系方面的现有文献有多方面的贡献。它通过结合多个视角加强理论整合,提供对社会冲突及其影响的全面理解。它有助于研究社会冲突,揭示社会冲突中不同类型的企业行为以及影响公众对这些行为的看法的机制。实证表明,组织也可以通过投资于积极的企业冲突参与行动来获得一些公共关系成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信