Quantitative risk assessment of cruise ship turbochargers using type-2 fuzzy-FMECA and dynamic Bayesian network approach

IF 7.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Shoaib Ahmed , Tie Li , Xinyi Zhou , Shuai Huang , Run Chen
{"title":"Quantitative risk assessment of cruise ship turbochargers using type-2 fuzzy-FMECA and dynamic Bayesian network approach","authors":"Shoaib Ahmed ,&nbsp;Tie Li ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhou ,&nbsp;Shuai Huang ,&nbsp;Run Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine propulsion systems, both traditional and modern electric, face significant risks associated with turbocharger and lubrication system failures. The failure outcomes can be severe, with accidents leading to deaths onboard, damage to machinery causing operational disruption, environmental pollution, and financial losses. While traditional Failure mode, effect, and criticality analysis (FMECA) methods excel in identifying system failures, their reliance on single-point estimates for severity, occurrence, and non-detection may prove limiting. Moreover, employing multiple experts in assessments can introduce biases. Integrating type-2 Fuzzy-FMECA with the linear opinion pool method is a robust approach to address these limitations. Leveraging the collective expertise of multiple experts, this framework enhances risk assessment comprehensiveness and accuracy. Focusing on the Carnival Freedom cruise ship incident near the Cayman Islands in October 2019, this study aims to develop a comprehensive risk assessment framework for assessing marine engine turbocharger and lubrication system risks. This study showed a strong positive correlation of 0.99 between the traditional risk prioritization number and the proposed type-2 fuzzy logic method, demonstrating its validity as a reliable alternative. This method effectively identified critical machinery failures, such as low-pressure switch and pressure control valve malfunctions, consistently aligning with the results of Traditional methods. It combines a dynamic Bayesian network for handling uncertainty with an interval type-2 fuzzy expert system and a bow-tie model. This framework enables both qualitative hazard identification and quantitative risk assessment. This risk analysis approach holds practical applicability in real-world scenarios, and its outcomes significantly provide actionable insights to mitigate and eliminate potential failures. Ultimately, it reduces the risk and improves the safety and reliability of cruise ship operations, providing a tangible solution to a pressing problem in the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 113568"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494625008798","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine propulsion systems, both traditional and modern electric, face significant risks associated with turbocharger and lubrication system failures. The failure outcomes can be severe, with accidents leading to deaths onboard, damage to machinery causing operational disruption, environmental pollution, and financial losses. While traditional Failure mode, effect, and criticality analysis (FMECA) methods excel in identifying system failures, their reliance on single-point estimates for severity, occurrence, and non-detection may prove limiting. Moreover, employing multiple experts in assessments can introduce biases. Integrating type-2 Fuzzy-FMECA with the linear opinion pool method is a robust approach to address these limitations. Leveraging the collective expertise of multiple experts, this framework enhances risk assessment comprehensiveness and accuracy. Focusing on the Carnival Freedom cruise ship incident near the Cayman Islands in October 2019, this study aims to develop a comprehensive risk assessment framework for assessing marine engine turbocharger and lubrication system risks. This study showed a strong positive correlation of 0.99 between the traditional risk prioritization number and the proposed type-2 fuzzy logic method, demonstrating its validity as a reliable alternative. This method effectively identified critical machinery failures, such as low-pressure switch and pressure control valve malfunctions, consistently aligning with the results of Traditional methods. It combines a dynamic Bayesian network for handling uncertainty with an interval type-2 fuzzy expert system and a bow-tie model. This framework enables both qualitative hazard identification and quantitative risk assessment. This risk analysis approach holds practical applicability in real-world scenarios, and its outcomes significantly provide actionable insights to mitigate and eliminate potential failures. Ultimately, it reduces the risk and improves the safety and reliability of cruise ship operations, providing a tangible solution to a pressing problem in the field.
基于2型模糊fmeca和动态贝叶斯网络的游轮涡轮增压器定量风险评估
船舶推进系统,无论是传统的还是现代的电动推进系统,都面临着与涡轮增压器和润滑系统故障相关的重大风险。故障的后果可能很严重,事故可能导致船上人员死亡,机器损坏导致操作中断,环境污染和经济损失。虽然传统的故障模式、影响和临界性分析(FMECA)方法在识别系统故障方面表现出色,但它们对严重性、发生率和未检测性的单点估计可能被证明是有限的。此外,在评估中使用多个专家可能会引入偏见。将2型模糊fmeca与线性意见池方法相结合是解决这些限制的一种鲁棒方法。利用多位专家的集体专业知识,该框架增强了风险评估的全面性和准确性。本研究以2019年10月在开曼群岛附近发生的嘉年华自由号游轮事故为重点,旨在制定一个全面的风险评估框架,以评估船用发动机涡轮增压器和润滑系统的风险。本研究表明,传统的风险优先级数与所提出的二类模糊逻辑方法之间存在0.99的强正相关,证明了其作为一种可靠的替代方案的有效性。该方法能有效识别关键机械故障,如低压开关和压力控制阀故障,与传统方法的结果一致。它将处理不确定性的动态贝叶斯网络与区间2型模糊专家系统和领结模型相结合。这一框架使定性的危险识别和定量的风险评估成为可能。这种风险分析方法在现实场景中具有实际的适用性,其结果显著地提供了可操作的见解,以减轻和消除潜在的故障。最终,它降低了风险,提高了游轮运营的安全性和可靠性,为该领域的紧迫问题提供了切实可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
874
审稿时长
10.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信