{"title":"Surface roughness and dimensional evaluation of laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured shell and tube heat exchangers","authors":"Bailey Spickler , Jamee Gray , Dusty Nicolaisen , Bryan Schiefelbein , Christopher Depcik","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.103858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing interest in additively manufactured (AM) heat exchangers drove the need to understand how this construction technique impacts heat exchanger performance. Two primary factors driven by AM that influence heat exchanger performance are surface roughness and geometry. To better understand these parameters, a range of shell and tube heat exchangers constructed using laser powder bed fusion were evaluated. Of those evaluated, the surface roughness throughout a fourteen-tube, zero-baffle heat exchanger was measured using computed tomography. Between the inner and outer tubes, the inner tube surfaces had a greater surface roughness than the outer by 8.07 μm, while the surfaces at the top of the build volume had higher surface roughness values than the bottom. Dimensionally, the inner tube diameters of this heat exchanger were 0.15 % different from the design value, while the outer diameters were within a 0.84 % difference. Manual measurements across seven other heat exchangers yielded a maximum 1.15 % difference between the design and measured diameters. Across the build volume for all heat exchangers studied, the tube diameters at the top were larger than at the bottom by a maximum of 1.24 % difference. Inconsistent melting throughout the individual parts and the build volume, as well as particle splatter and thermal gradient variation were attributed to the surface roughness and dimensional changes seen. These results strengthen the knowledge of dimensional and surface roughness considerations when designing AM heat exchangers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103858"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925006493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The growing interest in additively manufactured (AM) heat exchangers drove the need to understand how this construction technique impacts heat exchanger performance. Two primary factors driven by AM that influence heat exchanger performance are surface roughness and geometry. To better understand these parameters, a range of shell and tube heat exchangers constructed using laser powder bed fusion were evaluated. Of those evaluated, the surface roughness throughout a fourteen-tube, zero-baffle heat exchanger was measured using computed tomography. Between the inner and outer tubes, the inner tube surfaces had a greater surface roughness than the outer by 8.07 μm, while the surfaces at the top of the build volume had higher surface roughness values than the bottom. Dimensionally, the inner tube diameters of this heat exchanger were 0.15 % different from the design value, while the outer diameters were within a 0.84 % difference. Manual measurements across seven other heat exchangers yielded a maximum 1.15 % difference between the design and measured diameters. Across the build volume for all heat exchangers studied, the tube diameters at the top were larger than at the bottom by a maximum of 1.24 % difference. Inconsistent melting throughout the individual parts and the build volume, as well as particle splatter and thermal gradient variation were attributed to the surface roughness and dimensional changes seen. These results strengthen the knowledge of dimensional and surface roughness considerations when designing AM heat exchangers.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.