Giovanni Vagnoli , Martino Andrea Scarpolini , Roberto Verzicco , Francesco Viola
{"title":"A local and explicit forcing correction for Lagrangian immersed boundary methods","authors":"Giovanni Vagnoli , Martino Andrea Scarpolini , Roberto Verzicco , Francesco Viola","doi":"10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lagrangian immersed boundary methods (IBM) are widely used to study flows with complex and moving boundaries, such as biological flows. However, it has been noted that in some cases the resulting no-slip condition at the wet tissues is inaccurate. In this work, we propose an improved technique to evaluate the IBM forces with the aim of reducing slip and transpiration velocities at the immersed wet surfaces. In the framework of Moving Least Squares transfer function (MLS-IBM), we first formulate the problem of determining the IB forces in an implicit manner. Although this approach enforces the no-slip condition to machine precision, we demonstrate that this method is unaffordable for moderate/high Reynolds number flows. Nevertheless, insight of the implicit formulation reveals that it is possible to derive analytically a local correction to the IB forcing via an approximate factorisation of the system matrix of the implicit IBM. The resulting correction is fully explicit and it can be easily implemented in existing IB codes and extended to other Lagrangian IBMs. Our approach is then tested and compared against standard IBM-MLS (also in its iterative version) in a series of benchmark flows, including fixed and moving rigid bodies, and finally in the biological flow within a rigid aorta. Importantly, the proposed correction is seen to greatly improve the consistency and convergence properties of the IBM-MLS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":285,"journal":{"name":"Computer Physics Communications","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 109741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Physics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465525002437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lagrangian immersed boundary methods (IBM) are widely used to study flows with complex and moving boundaries, such as biological flows. However, it has been noted that in some cases the resulting no-slip condition at the wet tissues is inaccurate. In this work, we propose an improved technique to evaluate the IBM forces with the aim of reducing slip and transpiration velocities at the immersed wet surfaces. In the framework of Moving Least Squares transfer function (MLS-IBM), we first formulate the problem of determining the IB forces in an implicit manner. Although this approach enforces the no-slip condition to machine precision, we demonstrate that this method is unaffordable for moderate/high Reynolds number flows. Nevertheless, insight of the implicit formulation reveals that it is possible to derive analytically a local correction to the IB forcing via an approximate factorisation of the system matrix of the implicit IBM. The resulting correction is fully explicit and it can be easily implemented in existing IB codes and extended to other Lagrangian IBMs. Our approach is then tested and compared against standard IBM-MLS (also in its iterative version) in a series of benchmark flows, including fixed and moving rigid bodies, and finally in the biological flow within a rigid aorta. Importantly, the proposed correction is seen to greatly improve the consistency and convergence properties of the IBM-MLS.
期刊介绍:
The focus of CPC is on contemporary computational methods and techniques and their implementation, the effectiveness of which will normally be evidenced by the author(s) within the context of a substantive problem in physics. Within this setting CPC publishes two types of paper.
Computer Programs in Physics (CPiP)
These papers describe significant computer programs to be archived in the CPC Program Library which is held in the Mendeley Data repository. The submitted software must be covered by an approved open source licence. Papers and associated computer programs that address a problem of contemporary interest in physics that cannot be solved by current software are particularly encouraged.
Computational Physics Papers (CP)
These are research papers in, but are not limited to, the following themes across computational physics and related disciplines.
mathematical and numerical methods and algorithms;
computational models including those associated with the design, control and analysis of experiments; and
algebraic computation.
Each will normally include software implementation and performance details. The software implementation should, ideally, be available via GitHub, Zenodo or an institutional repository.In addition, research papers on the impact of advanced computer architecture and special purpose computers on computing in the physical sciences and software topics related to, and of importance in, the physical sciences may be considered.