Improving sustainability in waste management based on the Internet of Things: A robust hybrid decision-making framework

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri , Maghsoud Amiri , Ali Mostafaeipour , Ttu Le
{"title":"Improving sustainability in waste management based on the Internet of Things: A robust hybrid decision-making framework","authors":"Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri ,&nbsp;Maghsoud Amiri ,&nbsp;Ali Mostafaeipour ,&nbsp;Ttu Le","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One of the practical fields for implementing the Internet of Things (IoT) is Waste Management Systems (WMS) in smart cities, which is vital due to the increase in population density. The implementation of IoT in the WMS faces many challenges that affect the successful execution of this technology. Therefore, this examination aims to present a hybrid MCDM framework under uncertainty to evaluate the challenges of implementing IoT in WMS of smart cities. A set of criteria, including technical dimensions, technological capabilities, and aspects of sustainable development, are considered in this research. Then, criteria are weighted utilizing the Best Worst Method (BWM) approach. Next, the challenges of IoT in the WMS are assessed using the Grey Evaluation based on the Distance from Average Solution (EDAS-G) technique. The Grey Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS-G), Grey COmplex Proportional Assessment of alternatives (COPRAS-G), and Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) techniques are proposed to examine the validation. The findings indicated the lack of Information Technology (IT) infrastructure/architecture was the most critical challenge. Policymakers and planners must provide suitable facilities and architecture for IoT implementation in various fields. The fields of attracting investments and developing IT infrastructure are improved through financial incentives and better cooperation with companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the practical fields for implementing the Internet of Things (IoT) is Waste Management Systems (WMS) in smart cities, which is vital due to the increase in population density. The implementation of IoT in the WMS faces many challenges that affect the successful execution of this technology. Therefore, this examination aims to present a hybrid MCDM framework under uncertainty to evaluate the challenges of implementing IoT in WMS of smart cities. A set of criteria, including technical dimensions, technological capabilities, and aspects of sustainable development, are considered in this research. Then, criteria are weighted utilizing the Best Worst Method (BWM) approach. Next, the challenges of IoT in the WMS are assessed using the Grey Evaluation based on the Distance from Average Solution (EDAS-G) technique. The Grey Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS-G), Grey COmplex Proportional Assessment of alternatives (COPRAS-G), and Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) techniques are proposed to examine the validation. The findings indicated the lack of Information Technology (IT) infrastructure/architecture was the most critical challenge. Policymakers and planners must provide suitable facilities and architecture for IoT implementation in various fields. The fields of attracting investments and developing IT infrastructure are improved through financial incentives and better cooperation with companies.
基于物联网提高废物管理的可持续性:一个强大的混合决策框架
在智慧城市中实施物联网(IoT)的实际领域之一是废物管理系统(WMS),由于人口密度的增加,这一点至关重要。物联网在WMS中的实施面临许多挑战,这些挑战会影响该技术的成功执行。因此,本研究旨在提出不确定性下的混合MCDM框架,以评估在智慧城市WMS中实施物联网的挑战。本研究考虑了一系列标准,包括技术层面、技术能力和可持续发展的各个方面。然后,利用最佳最差法(BWM)方法对标准进行加权。接下来,使用基于平均解决方案距离(EDAS-G)技术的灰色评估来评估物联网在WMS中的挑战。提出了理想解相似偏好排序灰色技术(TOPSIS-G)、备选方案灰色复比例评估(COPRAS-G)和灰色加性比率评估(ARAS-G)技术来检验其有效性。调查结果显示,缺乏信息技术(IT)基础设施/架构是最关键的挑战。决策者和规划者必须为各个领域的物联网实施提供合适的设施和架构。通过财政奖励和加强与企业的合作,吸引投资和发展信息技术基础设施等领域得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信