High-accuracy mineralization evaluation of VMS deposits using machine learning and basalt geochemistry

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Jiachen Li , Xiang Sun , Ke Xiao , Qiuyun Wang , Xiaoya Liang , Limeng Cui
{"title":"High-accuracy mineralization evaluation of VMS deposits using machine learning and basalt geochemistry","authors":"Jiachen Li ,&nbsp;Xiang Sun ,&nbsp;Ke Xiao ,&nbsp;Qiuyun Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoya Liang ,&nbsp;Limeng Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Basalt is a common volcanic rock in volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits, and its geochemical composition provides critical insights into magmatic source characteristics, thereby serving as an essential proxy for evaluating the mineralization potential of VMS deposits. However, traditional assessment approaches often suffer from low efficiency due to the lack of clearly defined geochemical indicators and an overreliance on empirical interpretations. To address these limitations, we compiled a comprehensive global database of geochemical data for both mineralized and unmineralized basalts, and applied three machine learning algorithms—Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Random Forest (RF)—to develop predictive models for VMS mineralization potential. All three models yielded high prediction performance, with both accuracy and F1-scores exceeding 99.63 %. Among them, the AdaBoost model achieved the best results, with an accuracy and F1-score of 99.79 %. Despite the strong predictive capabilities of these models, their “black-box” nature often limits the interpretability of feature importance. To enhance model transparency, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify the contribution of each geochemical variable and to construct geochemically meaningful discrimination diagrams. The effectiveness of these indicators was further validated through logistic regression analysis. Our results indicate that Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, TiO<sub>2</sub>, and Co are among the most influential elements for distinguishing barren from fertile basalts. We developed classification diagrams based on key element ratios, notably Co/Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. V/Tm and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. TiO<sub>2</sub>, which yielded classification accuracies of 95.51 % and 84.90 %, respectively. These diagrams offer intuitive and effective tools for rapid assessment of VMS mineralization potential. Overall, this study establishes a novel framework for objective, data-driven mineralization evaluation in VMS exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136825003403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Basalt is a common volcanic rock in volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits, and its geochemical composition provides critical insights into magmatic source characteristics, thereby serving as an essential proxy for evaluating the mineralization potential of VMS deposits. However, traditional assessment approaches often suffer from low efficiency due to the lack of clearly defined geochemical indicators and an overreliance on empirical interpretations. To address these limitations, we compiled a comprehensive global database of geochemical data for both mineralized and unmineralized basalts, and applied three machine learning algorithms—Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Random Forest (RF)—to develop predictive models for VMS mineralization potential. All three models yielded high prediction performance, with both accuracy and F1-scores exceeding 99.63 %. Among them, the AdaBoost model achieved the best results, with an accuracy and F1-score of 99.79 %. Despite the strong predictive capabilities of these models, their “black-box” nature often limits the interpretability of feature importance. To enhance model transparency, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify the contribution of each geochemical variable and to construct geochemically meaningful discrimination diagrams. The effectiveness of these indicators was further validated through logistic regression analysis. Our results indicate that Fe2O3, TiO2, and Co are among the most influential elements for distinguishing barren from fertile basalts. We developed classification diagrams based on key element ratios, notably Co/Fe2O3 vs. V/Tm and Fe2O3 vs. TiO2, which yielded classification accuracies of 95.51 % and 84.90 %, respectively. These diagrams offer intuitive and effective tools for rapid assessment of VMS mineralization potential. Overall, this study establishes a novel framework for objective, data-driven mineralization evaluation in VMS exploration.

Abstract Image

基于机器学习和玄武岩地球化学的VMS矿床高精度成矿评价
玄武岩是火山成因块状硫化物(VMS)矿床中常见的火山岩,其地球化学组成为了解岩浆源特征提供了重要依据,是评价VMS矿床成矿潜力的重要指标。然而,由于缺乏明确定义的地球化学指标和过度依赖经验解释,传统的评价方法往往存在效率低的问题。为了解决这些限制,我们编制了一个综合的全球矿化和非矿化玄武岩地球化学数据数据库,并应用三种机器学习算法-自适应增强(AdaBoost),梯度增强决策树(GBDT)和随机森林(RF) -建立VMS矿化潜力的预测模型。三种模型均取得了较好的预测效果,准确率和f1分数均超过99.63%。其中,AdaBoost模型取得了最好的结果,准确率和f1得分达到99.79%。尽管这些模型具有强大的预测能力,但它们的“黑箱”性质往往限制了特征重要性的可解释性。为了提高模型的透明度,我们采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)来量化每个地球化学变量的贡献,并构建有地球化学意义的区分图。通过logistic回归分析进一步验证这些指标的有效性。我们的研究结果表明,Fe2O3、TiO2和Co是区分贫瘠和肥沃玄武岩的最重要元素。我们建立了基于关键元素比例的分类图,特别是Co/Fe2O3 vs. V/Tm和Fe2O3 vs. TiO2,分类准确率分别为95.51%和84.90%。这些图为快速评价VMS矿化潜力提供了直观有效的工具。总的来说,本研究为VMS勘探中客观的、数据驱动的矿化评价建立了一个新的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ore Geology Reviews
Ore Geology Reviews 地学-地质学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
27.30%
发文量
546
审稿时长
22.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信