The validation and application of an ovine fertility model using standardised in vitro thresholds to predict the likelihood of pregnancy

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q3 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
E.A. Spanner, S.P. de Graaf, J.P. Rickard
{"title":"The validation and application of an ovine fertility model using standardised in vitro thresholds to predict the likelihood of pregnancy","authors":"E.A. Spanner,&nbsp;S.P. de Graaf,&nbsp;J.P. Rickard","doi":"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deciphering a ram or ewe's reproductive potential is crucial to ensure high reproductive performance and maximise production outcomes. This study validates the accuracy of an ovine fertility model created to predict the likelihood of pregnancy occurring following laparoscopic artificial insemination (AI) and proposes <em>in vitro</em> semen standards to improve pregnancy outcomes. Semen from Merino sires (N = 26) was inseminated into synchronised Merino ewes (N = 1269) across 3 breeding seasons (2021–2023). Uterine tone and intra-abdominal fat of ewes were scored at AI, while the freezing concentration, abnormal sperm, acrosome viability (6h) and CASA motility and velocity traits (0h) of semen inseminated was assessed post-thaw (6h; 37 °C). Pregnancy predictions were compared with ultrasound-confirmed pregnancies ∼55 days post-AI, using discrimination and calibration tests to correctly assess its ability to classify pregnant and non-pregnant ewes. The model demonstrated high accuracy (77 %), precision (96 %) and recall (76 %) but lower specificity (33 %). It recorded an F1-score of 0.85, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.62. There was no statistical difference between predicted and actual pregnancy results (P = 0.184) despite an error value of 26 %. A cutting point split the data for each <em>in vitro</em> semen predictor and calculated the average pregnancy rate above and below this point. The cutting point with the greatest difference between pregnancy rates was chosen as the semen threshold. When entered into the model, these thresholds returned a cumulative pregnancy probability of 64.3 %. These standards could be used to screen semen before AI, reducing the variability of laparoscopic AI programs for the industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23131,"journal":{"name":"Theriogenology","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 117575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theriogenology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X25003012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deciphering a ram or ewe's reproductive potential is crucial to ensure high reproductive performance and maximise production outcomes. This study validates the accuracy of an ovine fertility model created to predict the likelihood of pregnancy occurring following laparoscopic artificial insemination (AI) and proposes in vitro semen standards to improve pregnancy outcomes. Semen from Merino sires (N = 26) was inseminated into synchronised Merino ewes (N = 1269) across 3 breeding seasons (2021–2023). Uterine tone and intra-abdominal fat of ewes were scored at AI, while the freezing concentration, abnormal sperm, acrosome viability (6h) and CASA motility and velocity traits (0h) of semen inseminated was assessed post-thaw (6h; 37 °C). Pregnancy predictions were compared with ultrasound-confirmed pregnancies ∼55 days post-AI, using discrimination and calibration tests to correctly assess its ability to classify pregnant and non-pregnant ewes. The model demonstrated high accuracy (77 %), precision (96 %) and recall (76 %) but lower specificity (33 %). It recorded an F1-score of 0.85, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.62. There was no statistical difference between predicted and actual pregnancy results (P = 0.184) despite an error value of 26 %. A cutting point split the data for each in vitro semen predictor and calculated the average pregnancy rate above and below this point. The cutting point with the greatest difference between pregnancy rates was chosen as the semen threshold. When entered into the model, these thresholds returned a cumulative pregnancy probability of 64.3 %. These standards could be used to screen semen before AI, reducing the variability of laparoscopic AI programs for the industry.
使用标准化体外阈值预测怀孕可能性的绵羊生育模型的验证和应用
破译公羊或母羊的繁殖潜力对于确保高繁殖性能和最大化生产结果至关重要。本研究验证了用于预测腹腔镜人工授精(AI)后妊娠可能性的绵羊生育模型的准确性,并提出了体外精液标准以改善妊娠结局。将美利奴母羊(N = 26)的精液在3个繁殖季节(2021-2023)内受精到同步的美利奴母羊(N = 1269)中。在人工授精时对母羊的子宫张力和腹内脂肪进行评分,解冻后(6h)对受精精液的冷冻浓度、异常精子、顶体活力(6h)和CASA运动和速度性状(0h)进行评估;37°C)。将妊娠预测与人工智能后55天的超声确认妊娠进行比较,使用区分和校准测试来正确评估其对怀孕和未怀孕母羊进行分类的能力。该模型具有较高的准确度(77%)、精密度(96%)和召回率(76%),但特异性较低(33%)。它的f1得分为0.85,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.62。预测妊娠结果与实际妊娠结果差异无统计学意义(P = 0.184),误差值为26%。一个切点将每个体外精子预测器的数据分开,并计算出高于和低于该点的平均怀孕率。选取妊娠率差异最大的切点作为精液阈值。当输入模型时,这些阈值返回的累积怀孕概率为64.3%。这些标准可以用来在人工智能之前筛选精液,减少行业腹腔镜人工智能项目的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theriogenology
Theriogenology 农林科学-生殖生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
387
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Theriogenology provides an international forum for researchers, clinicians, and industry professionals in animal reproductive biology. This acclaimed journal publishes articles on a wide range of topics in reproductive and developmental biology, of domestic mammal, avian, and aquatic species as well as wild species which are the object of veterinary care in research or conservation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信