Xing Ye , Jiao Xu , Qingsong Yuan , Ye Yang , Lanping Guo , Yanhong Wang , Tao Zhou
{"title":"Response of soil bacterial community composition and function to Gastrodia elata Bl. consecutive monoculture: Insights from metagenomic analysis","authors":"Xing Ye , Jiao Xu , Qingsong Yuan , Ye Yang , Lanping Guo , Yanhong Wang , Tao Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Gastrodia elata</em> Bl. monoculture practice commonly contributes to yield decline over consecutive planting cycles. Given the critical role of soil microbiota in soil biogeochemical cycling, understanding microbiome shifts under consecutive cultivation could provide insights for yield sustainability. However, knowledge gap remains regarding which microbial taxa response to consecutive monoculture and how they respond. Thus, the composition and function of soil bacterial communities in a field where <em>G. elata</em> had been cultured for one year (CC1), consecutively cultured for 2 years (CC2), and no-tillage control (CK) were compared. Both CC1 and CC2 increased the soil bacterial richness and evenness, as evidenced by ACE (<em>p</em> = 0.0025) and Simpson (<em>p</em> = 0.006) indices. Principal coordinates analysis revealed distinct clustering of bacterial community structures, with CC1 and CC2 samples significantly separated from control (CK) samples (R=0.636, <em>p</em> = 0.001). Comparative analysis showed that CC1 and CC2 treatments significantly reduced the relative abundances of <em>Arthrobacter</em> and <em>Candidatus_Acidoferrum</em> compared to CK, while increasing the abundances of <em>Afipia, Alloacidobacterium, Bradyrhizobium</em> and <em>Burkholderia</em>. Soil pH (R=0.4721, <em>p</em> = 0.009), alkali-hydrolytic nitrogen (AN; R=0.4855, <em>p</em> = 0.012), available phosphorus (AP; R=0.4474, <em>p</em> = 0.014), and total potassium (total K; R=0.5149, <em>p</em> = 0.005) emerged as the key edaphic factors shaping bacterial community structure and composition. <em>G. elata</em> cultivation, either single-cycle or consecutive, significantly reduced the abundance of GT41, GT83, GH109, GH33, and GT5 (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Conversely, AA3_2, GH13_11, GH13_16, GH39, GH51, and GH103 showed the opposite trend. Our findings highlight the complexity of microbial feedback mechanisms and soil-microbiome interactions under <em>G. elata</em> monoculture conditions<em>.</em></div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104372"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235218642500358X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gastrodia elata Bl. monoculture practice commonly contributes to yield decline over consecutive planting cycles. Given the critical role of soil microbiota in soil biogeochemical cycling, understanding microbiome shifts under consecutive cultivation could provide insights for yield sustainability. However, knowledge gap remains regarding which microbial taxa response to consecutive monoculture and how they respond. Thus, the composition and function of soil bacterial communities in a field where G. elata had been cultured for one year (CC1), consecutively cultured for 2 years (CC2), and no-tillage control (CK) were compared. Both CC1 and CC2 increased the soil bacterial richness and evenness, as evidenced by ACE (p = 0.0025) and Simpson (p = 0.006) indices. Principal coordinates analysis revealed distinct clustering of bacterial community structures, with CC1 and CC2 samples significantly separated from control (CK) samples (R=0.636, p = 0.001). Comparative analysis showed that CC1 and CC2 treatments significantly reduced the relative abundances of Arthrobacter and Candidatus_Acidoferrum compared to CK, while increasing the abundances of Afipia, Alloacidobacterium, Bradyrhizobium and Burkholderia. Soil pH (R=0.4721, p = 0.009), alkali-hydrolytic nitrogen (AN; R=0.4855, p = 0.012), available phosphorus (AP; R=0.4474, p = 0.014), and total potassium (total K; R=0.5149, p = 0.005) emerged as the key edaphic factors shaping bacterial community structure and composition. G. elata cultivation, either single-cycle or consecutive, significantly reduced the abundance of GT41, GT83, GH109, GH33, and GT5 (p < 0.05). Conversely, AA3_2, GH13_11, GH13_16, GH39, GH51, and GH103 showed the opposite trend. Our findings highlight the complexity of microbial feedback mechanisms and soil-microbiome interactions under G. elata monoculture conditions.
天麻单一栽培通常会导致连续种植周期产量下降。考虑到土壤微生物群在土壤生物地球化学循环中的关键作用,了解连续栽培下微生物群的变化可以为产量的可持续性提供见解。然而,关于哪些微生物类群对连续单一栽培的反应以及它们如何反应,知识差距仍然存在。在此基础上,比较了连续栽培1年(CC1)、连续栽培2年(CC2)和免耕对照(CK)土壤细菌群落的组成和功能。ACE指数(p = 0.0025)和Simpson指数(p = 0.006)表明,CC1和CC2均能提高土壤细菌丰富度和均匀度。主坐标分析显示细菌群落结构明显聚集,CC1和CC2样品与对照(CK)样品明显分离(R=0.636, p = 0.001)。对比分析表明,与CK相比,CC1和CC2处理显著降低了关节杆菌和候选酸铁菌的相对丰度,而增加了Afipia、Alloacidobacterium、Bradyrhizobium和Burkholderia的相对丰度。土壤pH (R=0.4721, p = 0.009)、碱解氮(AN;R=0.4855, p = 0.012),有效磷(AP;R=0.4474, p = 0.014),全钾(total K;R=0.5149, p = 0.005)是影响细菌群落结构和组成的关键土壤因子。单循环或连续培养均显著降低GT41、GT83、GH109、GH33和GT5的丰度(p <; 0.05)。相反,AA3_2、GH13_11、GH13_16、GH39、GH51和GH103呈现相反的趋势。我们的研究结果强调了单作条件下微生物反馈机制和土壤-微生物组相互作用的复杂性。
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas.
As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.