Effects of Dexmedetomidine vs Esmolol on Postintubation Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis.

Abbass Saleh, Stacy Kan, Sonica Singhal, Aviv Ouanounou, Michelle Wong
{"title":"Effects of Dexmedetomidine vs Esmolol on Postintubation Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abbass Saleh, Stacy Kan, Sonica Singhal, Aviv Ouanounou, Michelle Wong","doi":"10.2344/23-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tracheal intubation (TI) consistently induces tachycardia and elevated blood pressure which may be deleterious to patients, particularly those with existing cardiac conditions. Use of dexmedetomidine or esmolol has been described to attenuate this sympathetic response. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine vs esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic response during TI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search in electronic databases and grey literature was completed. Researchers assessed article eligibility, performed data extraction, and completed risk of bias assessment. Results were expressed as pooled differences for cardiovascular parameters between the drugs as the weighted mean difference with 95% CI. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses exploring different drug regimens were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 112 publications, 19 randomized controlled trials were included for descriptive analysis and 15 were selected for the meta-analysis with 948 patients. The use of dexmedetomidine vs esmolol provided lower heart rates and mean arterial pressures at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes and lower systolic and diastolic pressures at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after TI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine blunts the hemodynamic response to TI more effectively vs esmolol.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 1","pages":"9-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/23-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Tracheal intubation (TI) consistently induces tachycardia and elevated blood pressure which may be deleterious to patients, particularly those with existing cardiac conditions. Use of dexmedetomidine or esmolol has been described to attenuate this sympathetic response. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine vs esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic response during TI.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search in electronic databases and grey literature was completed. Researchers assessed article eligibility, performed data extraction, and completed risk of bias assessment. Results were expressed as pooled differences for cardiovascular parameters between the drugs as the weighted mean difference with 95% CI. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses exploring different drug regimens were performed.

Results: Of 112 publications, 19 randomized controlled trials were included for descriptive analysis and 15 were selected for the meta-analysis with 948 patients. The use of dexmedetomidine vs esmolol provided lower heart rates and mean arterial pressures at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes and lower systolic and diastolic pressures at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after TI.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine blunts the hemodynamic response to TI more effectively vs esmolol.

右美托咪定与艾司洛尔对插管后血流动力学的影响:荟萃分析。
目的:气管插管(TI)持续诱导心动过速和血压升高,这可能对患者有害,特别是那些已有心脏疾病的患者。使用右美托咪定或艾司洛尔可以减轻这种交感神经反应。本研究旨在确定右美托咪定与艾司洛尔在TI期间降低血流动力学反应的有效性。方法:采用PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。在电子数据库和灰色文献中进行了系统的文献检索。研究人员评估了文章的合格性,进行了数据提取,并完成了偏倚风险评估。结果表示为药物间心血管参数的合并差异,加权平均差异为95% CI。P < 0.05认为有统计学意义。异质性采用I2统计量进行量化。进行亚组分析,探索不同的药物方案。结果:112篇文献中,19篇随机对照试验纳入描述性分析,15篇纳入948例患者的meta分析。使用右美托咪定与艾司洛尔在TI后1、3、5和10分钟的心率和平均动脉压较低,在1、3和5分钟的收缩压和舒张压较低。结论:右美托咪定比艾司洛尔更有效地减弱TI的血流动力学反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信