Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission (EMIT-2): Insights from a Controlled Human Influenza Virus Infection Transmission Trial (CHIVITT).

Jianyu Lai, Hamed Sobhani, Kristen K Coleman, S-H Sheldon Tai, Filbert Hong, Isabel Sierra Maldonado, Yi Esparza, Kathleen M McPhaul, Shengwei Zhu, Don L DeVoe, Justin R Ortiz, Shuo Chen, Temima Yellin, Juan Manuel Carreno, Florian Krammer, Benjamin J Cowling, Aubree Gordon, Wilbur H Chen, Jelena Srebric, Donald K Milton
{"title":"Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission (EMIT-2): Insights from a Controlled Human Influenza Virus Infection Transmission Trial (CHIVITT).","authors":"Jianyu Lai, Hamed Sobhani, Kristen K Coleman, S-H Sheldon Tai, Filbert Hong, Isabel Sierra Maldonado, Yi Esparza, Kathleen M McPhaul, Shengwei Zhu, Don L DeVoe, Justin R Ortiz, Shuo Chen, Temima Yellin, Juan Manuel Carreno, Florian Krammer, Benjamin J Cowling, Aubree Gordon, Wilbur H Chen, Jelena Srebric, Donald K Milton","doi":"10.1101/2025.04.28.25326458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A previous controlled human influenza transmission trial produced minimal transmission using nasal inoculation of an egg adapted virus. Therefore, we implemented a new trial with naturally infected Donors. We recruited healthy Recipients for four, two-week hotel quarantine cohorts and naturally infected, qRT-PCR confirmed Donors for two cohorts. Five Donors (mean age: 21; 80% female; two H1N1, three H3N2, one for cohort 24b and 4 for 24c, Jan-Feb 2024) exposed Recipients (mean age: 36; 55% female, eight in cohort 24b and 3 in 24c) in a hotel room with limited ventilation but a high air recirculation rate. We collected exhaled breath, ambient and personal bioaerosols, fomite swabs, and sera, and analyzed samples using dPCR and fluorescent focus assays, hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compared with previously studied community-acquired influenza cases, we detected viral RNA (44%) and culturable virus (6%) less frequently and measured fewer viral RNA copies (79 - 8.9×10 <sup>3</sup> copies/30-min) in Donors' exhaled fine aerosols. One of 23 surface swab samples was culture positive. At admission, 8 of 11 Recipients had HAI titers ≤10 but 9 of 11 had stronger binding antibody responses than Donors against vaccine strains corresponding to Donor viruses. No Recipient developed influenza-like illness, PCR-positive respiratory samples, or serological evidence of infection. Potential explanations and insights regarding lack of transmission include importance of cough and seasonal variation in viral aerosol shedding by Donors, of potential cross-reactive immunity in middle-aged Recipients with decades of exposure, and of exposure to concentrated exhaled breath plumes limited by rapid air mixing from environmental controls that distributed aerosols evenly. Future trials over multiple seasons, Donors that cough, younger recipients, and environments that preserve normal exhaled breath plumes will be required to observe transmission from naturally infected Donors under controlled conditions and generate new insights into influenza transmission dynamics.</p><p><strong>Author summary: </strong>Human-to-human influenza virus transmission under controlled conditions could provide insights leading to better control of epidemics and pandemics. However, a previous study using laboratory adapted viruses produced minimal transmission. Therefore, we aimed to study transmission from people naturally infected with circulating viruses. We recruited four cohorts of healthy volunteer Recipients to stay in a quarantine hotel for two weeks. We could not recruit Donors for the first two cohorts. In the last two cohorts, one Donor exposed eight Recipients in the first and four Donors exposed three Recipients in the second. The Donors coughed infrequently and shed less virus into the air than we had observed during previous influenza seasons. No Recipients became infected. Possible explanations include that people infected during mild influenza seasons or who cough very little may be minimally contagious. Our middle-aged Recipient cohorts were older than Donors and possibly less susceptible to infection because of additional years of vaccination and infection. Finally, environmental controls in the hotel distributed aerosols evenly but reduced short-range exposure to concentrated clouds of exhaled breath that may play an important role in transmission. New designs will need to address these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.28.25326458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A previous controlled human influenza transmission trial produced minimal transmission using nasal inoculation of an egg adapted virus. Therefore, we implemented a new trial with naturally infected Donors. We recruited healthy Recipients for four, two-week hotel quarantine cohorts and naturally infected, qRT-PCR confirmed Donors for two cohorts. Five Donors (mean age: 21; 80% female; two H1N1, three H3N2, one for cohort 24b and 4 for 24c, Jan-Feb 2024) exposed Recipients (mean age: 36; 55% female, eight in cohort 24b and 3 in 24c) in a hotel room with limited ventilation but a high air recirculation rate. We collected exhaled breath, ambient and personal bioaerosols, fomite swabs, and sera, and analyzed samples using dPCR and fluorescent focus assays, hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compared with previously studied community-acquired influenza cases, we detected viral RNA (44%) and culturable virus (6%) less frequently and measured fewer viral RNA copies (79 - 8.9×10 3 copies/30-min) in Donors' exhaled fine aerosols. One of 23 surface swab samples was culture positive. At admission, 8 of 11 Recipients had HAI titers ≤10 but 9 of 11 had stronger binding antibody responses than Donors against vaccine strains corresponding to Donor viruses. No Recipient developed influenza-like illness, PCR-positive respiratory samples, or serological evidence of infection. Potential explanations and insights regarding lack of transmission include importance of cough and seasonal variation in viral aerosol shedding by Donors, of potential cross-reactive immunity in middle-aged Recipients with decades of exposure, and of exposure to concentrated exhaled breath plumes limited by rapid air mixing from environmental controls that distributed aerosols evenly. Future trials over multiple seasons, Donors that cough, younger recipients, and environments that preserve normal exhaled breath plumes will be required to observe transmission from naturally infected Donors under controlled conditions and generate new insights into influenza transmission dynamics.

Author summary: Human-to-human influenza virus transmission under controlled conditions could provide insights leading to better control of epidemics and pandemics. However, a previous study using laboratory adapted viruses produced minimal transmission. Therefore, we aimed to study transmission from people naturally infected with circulating viruses. We recruited four cohorts of healthy volunteer Recipients to stay in a quarantine hotel for two weeks. We could not recruit Donors for the first two cohorts. In the last two cohorts, one Donor exposed eight Recipients in the first and four Donors exposed three Recipients in the second. The Donors coughed infrequently and shed less virus into the air than we had observed during previous influenza seasons. No Recipients became infected. Possible explanations include that people infected during mild influenza seasons or who cough very little may be minimally contagious. Our middle-aged Recipient cohorts were older than Donors and possibly less susceptible to infection because of additional years of vaccination and infection. Finally, environmental controls in the hotel distributed aerosols evenly but reduced short-range exposure to concentrated clouds of exhaled breath that may play an important role in transmission. New designs will need to address these issues.

评估流感传播模式(EMIT-2):控制人类流感病毒感染传播试验(CHIVITT)的挑战。
背景:通过吸入(空气传播)、直接沉积(喷雾)和接触(接触)传播流感的相对重要性仍然知之甚少。我们实施了一项受控制的人类流感病毒感染传播试验,以研究传播途径。方法:我们建立了一个隔离酒店,为参与者提供单独的房间,并招募健康的接受者进行为期两周的队列停留。我们招募了社区获得性流感病毒感染的供体,经qRT-PCR证实。供体和受体在一个通风有限、湿度可控的房间里进行互动。我们收集了环境和个人生物气溶胶、供体呼出气体和污染物表面拭子样本。我们用dPCR和荧光聚焦法分析了气溶胶和表面拭子样本,用血凝抑制(HAI)法和酶联免疫吸附法分析了血清。结果:我们招募了4个受体队列(1个2023年2月和3个2024年1月至2月),并招募了2个2024年队列的供体。我们暴露了11位接受者(平均年龄:36岁;55%为女性)至5名献血者(平均年龄:21岁;80%的女性;2例H1N1, 3例H3N2),持续82个供体小时。结论:我们成功招募了社区获得性流感供体,并在控制条件下暴露了健康的受体。然而,流感季节的时间不可预测、符合条件的受赠者数量少、已有免疫力以及供体病毒释放有限构成了重大挑战。解决这些因素对于优化未来的研究设计和提高我们对流感传播动力学的理解至关重要。作者总结:我们设计了一项对照干预试验,以确定流感病毒是否主要通过呼吸被污染的空气(空气/吸入传播)、近距离喷射(直接沉积)大的半弹道飞沫或接触(接触)在人与人之间传播。了解流感如何传播有助于改进预防策略、疫苗开发和公共卫生政策。我们招募了四组健康的志愿者接受者,在隔离酒店住了两周。我们要求他们在一个通风不良的房间里与最近在正常活动中感染流感病毒的捐赠者互动。我们成功地招募了五名捐赠者,在两个隔离队列的过程中与11名接受者互动。我们在供体呼出的气体、室内空气和物体表面检测到少量流感病毒,受者均未感染。流感季节的不可预测性、符合条件的受者人数较少、受者免疫力以及症状出现后24小时以上且病毒脱落率低的供者构成了重大挑战。这些结果表明,将需要新的设计,能够在感染过程的早期将更多的供体与易感受体聚集在一起,以增加观察传播的几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信