Traditional and Non-traditional Caregivers Define "Family" and Caregiving Obligations.

Sarah E Patterson, Kelsi Caywood, Samantha M Pantelic, Olivia Morreale
{"title":"Traditional and Non-traditional Caregivers Define \"Family\" and Caregiving Obligations.","authors":"Sarah E Patterson, Kelsi Caywood, Samantha M Pantelic, Olivia Morreale","doi":"10.1177/15333175251357328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Narrow definitions of family can constrain survey items about obligations regarding who should care for older adults. Current measurement often does not account for the increased prevalence of diverse family forms and support received among older adults. We draw on six focus groups (N = 33) of family or friends caring for older adults with trouble remembering, memory issues, or dementia to explore definitions of family, caregiving, and responsibility. Although many caregivers immediately default to traditional definitions, the breadth of \"family\" seen as responsible and actual care networks are often broader. In many cases, caregivers considered friends and other non-kin as family because they provided care. Furthermore, both care and obligations are shaped by family dynamics and the older adult's memory loss. Results suggest that survey measures should capture a wider range of relationship ties and dynamics to better understand family, caregiving obligations, and the tensions between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":93865,"journal":{"name":"American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias","volume":"40 ","pages":"15333175251357328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15333175251357328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Narrow definitions of family can constrain survey items about obligations regarding who should care for older adults. Current measurement often does not account for the increased prevalence of diverse family forms and support received among older adults. We draw on six focus groups (N = 33) of family or friends caring for older adults with trouble remembering, memory issues, or dementia to explore definitions of family, caregiving, and responsibility. Although many caregivers immediately default to traditional definitions, the breadth of "family" seen as responsible and actual care networks are often broader. In many cases, caregivers considered friends and other non-kin as family because they provided care. Furthermore, both care and obligations are shaped by family dynamics and the older adult's memory loss. Results suggest that survey measures should capture a wider range of relationship ties and dynamics to better understand family, caregiving obligations, and the tensions between them.

传统和非传统照顾者定义“家庭”和照顾义务。
狭义的家庭定义可能会限制关于谁应该照顾老年人的义务的调查项目。目前的衡量标准往往没有考虑到老年人中越来越多的家庭形式和得到的支持。我们利用六个焦点小组(N = 33)的家人或朋友来照顾有记忆障碍、记忆问题或痴呆症的老年人,以探索家庭、照顾和责任的定义。尽管许多护理人员立即默认了传统的定义,但被视为负责任和实际护理网络的“家庭”的广度往往更广。在许多情况下,照顾者把朋友和其他非亲属视为家人,因为他们提供照顾。此外,照顾和义务都受到家庭动态和老年人记忆丧失的影响。结果表明,调查措施应涵盖更广泛的关系关系和动态,以更好地了解家庭、照顾义务以及它们之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信