Call for collaboration: Drafting a concept inventory for assessing neuroscience courses and curriculum.

Monica M Gaudier-Diaz, Mackenzie E Mitchell, Shveta V Parekh, Sabrina D Robertson
{"title":"Call for collaboration: Drafting a concept inventory for assessing neuroscience courses and curriculum.","authors":"Monica M Gaudier-Diaz, Mackenzie E Mitchell, Shveta V Parekh, Sabrina D Robertson","doi":"10.59390/ZNKC2166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroscience draws upon concepts from biology, chemistry, computer sciences, philosophy, physics, and psychology, to study the nervous system. Growth of this field is evidenced by the expansion of neuroscience programs, all of which undergo accreditation to ensure educational quality. Content knowledge is commonly assessed for accreditation, but a standardized instrument measuring neuroscience content knowledge is yet to be developed. To address this gap, we are leveraging the eight neuroscience core concepts identified by Chen and colleagues to design a Neuroscience Concept Inventory (NCI). As a first draft, we generated a 57-multiple choice question tool and distributed among students in an introductory neuroscience course and declared neuroscience majors at a large public R1- institution. Item discrimination scores determining the quality of items ranged from 0.65-0.10, with 48 falling within acceptable range (>0.20). Alpha reliability scores determining reliability of items within a core concept ranged from 0.77-0.51, with 4 falling within acceptable range (>0.70). To exemplify the utility of a NCI, we present an accreditation report case study. Utilizing the NCI draft we demonstrate learning gains in an Introduction to Neuroscience course and among neuroscience majors. Our project sets the groundwork for the continued development of a reliable tool that facilitates content knowledge assessment of neuroscience programs and courses. The interdisciplinary nature and diversity of neuroscience programs present a major challenge to the development of a comprehensive content knowledge tool. Thus, we share this first draft as a call to the neuroscience community to join us to iteratively improve the instrument through collaboration and feedback. Those wishing to collaborate for tool development, please fill out this Qualtrics Form.</p>","PeriodicalId":74004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience","volume":"23 2","pages":"A73-A81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59390/ZNKC2166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuroscience draws upon concepts from biology, chemistry, computer sciences, philosophy, physics, and psychology, to study the nervous system. Growth of this field is evidenced by the expansion of neuroscience programs, all of which undergo accreditation to ensure educational quality. Content knowledge is commonly assessed for accreditation, but a standardized instrument measuring neuroscience content knowledge is yet to be developed. To address this gap, we are leveraging the eight neuroscience core concepts identified by Chen and colleagues to design a Neuroscience Concept Inventory (NCI). As a first draft, we generated a 57-multiple choice question tool and distributed among students in an introductory neuroscience course and declared neuroscience majors at a large public R1- institution. Item discrimination scores determining the quality of items ranged from 0.65-0.10, with 48 falling within acceptable range (>0.20). Alpha reliability scores determining reliability of items within a core concept ranged from 0.77-0.51, with 4 falling within acceptable range (>0.70). To exemplify the utility of a NCI, we present an accreditation report case study. Utilizing the NCI draft we demonstrate learning gains in an Introduction to Neuroscience course and among neuroscience majors. Our project sets the groundwork for the continued development of a reliable tool that facilitates content knowledge assessment of neuroscience programs and courses. The interdisciplinary nature and diversity of neuroscience programs present a major challenge to the development of a comprehensive content knowledge tool. Thus, we share this first draft as a call to the neuroscience community to join us to iteratively improve the instrument through collaboration and feedback. Those wishing to collaborate for tool development, please fill out this Qualtrics Form.

呼吁合作:起草一份评估神经科学课程和课程的概念清单。
神经科学利用生物学、化学、计算机科学、哲学、物理学和心理学的概念来研究神经系统。这一领域的发展可以通过神经科学项目的扩展得到证明,所有这些项目都经过认证以确保教育质量。内容知识通常是评估认证,但一个标准化的仪器测量神经科学内容知识尚未开发。为了解决这一差距,我们利用Chen及其同事确定的八个神经科学核心概念来设计神经科学概念清单(NCI)。作为初稿,我们制作了一个57道选择题的工具,并将其分发给一所大型公共机构的神经科学入门课程和宣布的神经科学专业的学生。决定项目质量的项目辨别得分范围为0.65-0.10,其中48分落在可接受范围内(>0.20)。确定核心概念内项目可靠性的Alpha信度得分范围为0.77-0.51,其中4分落在可接受范围内(>0.70)。为了举例说明NCI的效用,我们提出了一个认证报告案例研究。利用NCI草案,我们展示了神经科学入门课程和神经科学专业学生的学习收获。我们的项目为继续开发一种可靠的工具奠定了基础,该工具可以促进神经科学项目和课程的内容知识评估。神经科学项目的跨学科性质和多样性对开发综合性内容知识工具提出了重大挑战。因此,我们分享这个初稿,呼吁神经科学界加入我们,通过合作和反馈来迭代地改进仪器。那些希望合作开发工具的人,请填写这张素质表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信