Single-port robotic-assisted approach in thoracic surgery: A prospective real-world study.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chengqiang Li, Xiang Chen, Xipeng Wang, Wei Guo, Yajie Zhang, Fengxia Chen, Hecheng Li
{"title":"Single-port robotic-assisted approach in thoracic surgery: A prospective real-world study.","authors":"Chengqiang Li, Xiang Chen, Xipeng Wang, Wei Guo, Yajie Zhang, Fengxia Chen, Hecheng Li","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robotic systems have enhanced thoracic surgery through three-dimensional visualization, maneuverability, and tremor filtration. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the da Vinci single-port surgical system for thoracic surgery in a Chinese population (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06246617).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with highly malignant pulmonary nodules suitable for minimally invasive lung resection underwent anatomical lung resection using a single-port robotic system between December 2023 and May 2024. Perioperative and short-term follow-up outcomes were also assessed. Clinical data from another clinical trial (RVlob Trial: NCT03134534) were also obtained for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The procedure was successful in all 15 patients without intraoperative conversion, although three required an additional auxiliary port owing to a high body mass index and complex anatomy. Additionally, the median intraoperative blood loss and operative time were 15 (interquartile range [IQR], 10-37.5) mL and 100 (IQR, 86-119) min, respectively. The median length of hospital stay and duration of thoracic catheter retention were 8 (IQR, 7-9) and 2 (IQR, 2-2) days, respectively. No re-hospitalizations or re-admissions occurred. In comparison to the traditional robotic-assisted and video-assisted surgery groups, the single-port robotic surgery group showed a shorter operative time and less blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-port robotic thoracic surgery using the da Vinci single-port surgical system is safe and feasible for anatomical lung resection. Moreover, larger controlled studies are required to validate its effectiveness and compare its advantages with those of other surgical platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic systems have enhanced thoracic surgery through three-dimensional visualization, maneuverability, and tremor filtration. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the da Vinci single-port surgical system for thoracic surgery in a Chinese population (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06246617).

Methods: Patients with highly malignant pulmonary nodules suitable for minimally invasive lung resection underwent anatomical lung resection using a single-port robotic system between December 2023 and May 2024. Perioperative and short-term follow-up outcomes were also assessed. Clinical data from another clinical trial (RVlob Trial: NCT03134534) were also obtained for comparison.

Results: The procedure was successful in all 15 patients without intraoperative conversion, although three required an additional auxiliary port owing to a high body mass index and complex anatomy. Additionally, the median intraoperative blood loss and operative time were 15 (interquartile range [IQR], 10-37.5) mL and 100 (IQR, 86-119) min, respectively. The median length of hospital stay and duration of thoracic catheter retention were 8 (IQR, 7-9) and 2 (IQR, 2-2) days, respectively. No re-hospitalizations or re-admissions occurred. In comparison to the traditional robotic-assisted and video-assisted surgery groups, the single-port robotic surgery group showed a shorter operative time and less blood loss.

Conclusions: Single-port robotic thoracic surgery using the da Vinci single-port surgical system is safe and feasible for anatomical lung resection. Moreover, larger controlled studies are required to validate its effectiveness and compare its advantages with those of other surgical platforms.

胸外科单孔机器人辅助入路:一项前瞻性现实世界研究。
目的:机器人系统通过三维可视化、机动性和震颤过滤增强了胸外科手术。本研究评估了达芬奇单孔手术系统在中国人群胸外科手术中的有效性和安全性(ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT06246617)。方法:2023年12月至2024年5月,适合微创肺切除术的高恶性肺结节患者采用单口机器人系统进行解剖性肺切除术。围手术期和短期随访结果也进行了评估。还获得了另一项临床试验(RVlob试验:NCT03134534)的临床数据进行比较。结果:所有15例患者手术均成功,无术中转换,尽管有3例患者由于高体重指数和复杂的解剖结构需要额外的辅助端口。术中出血量和手术时间中位数分别为15(四分位数间距[IQR], 10-37.5) mL和100 (IQR, 86-119) min。住院时间中位数为8 (IQR, 7-9)天,胸导管留置时间中位数为2 (IQR, 2-2)天。无再次住院或再次入院发生。与传统机器人辅助和视频辅助手术组相比,单端口机器人手术组手术时间更短,出血量更少。结论:采用达芬奇单孔手术系统进行单孔胸外科机器人解剖肺切除术是安全可行的。此外,需要更大规模的对照研究来验证其有效性,并将其与其他手术平台的优势进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信