Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimise prescribing in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review.

HRB open research Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13909.2
Patrick Moynagh, Áine Mannion, Ashley Wei, Barbara Clyne, Frank Moriarty, Caroline McCarthy
{"title":"Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimise prescribing in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review.","authors":"Patrick Moynagh, Áine Mannion, Ashley Wei, Barbara Clyne, Frank Moriarty, Caroline McCarthy","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13909.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in therapeutics and healthcare have led to a growing population of individuals living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy making prescribing more challenging. Most prescribing occurs in primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) have expressed interest in comparative feedback on their prescribing performance. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and audit and feedback interventions have shown some impact, but changes are often short-lived. Interactive dashboards, a novel approach integrating CDSS and audit and feedback elements, offer longitudinal updated data outside clinical encounters. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in primary care and examine the characteristics of these dashboards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023481475) and reported in line with PRISMA-P guidelines. Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature, including trial registries were performed to identify interventional studies (randomised and non-randomised) that assess the effectiveness of interactive dashboards on prescribing related outcomes. The search will be supplemented by searching references of retrieved articles with the use of an automated citation chaser. Identified records will be screened independently by two reviewers and data from eligible studies extracted using a purposely developed data extraction tool. We will narratively summarise the intervention types and those associated with improvements in prescribing outcomes. A quantitative synthesis will be carried out if a sufficient number of homogenous studies are identified. Methodological quality will be assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care risk assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review will explore the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing related outcome measures in primary care and describe the characteristics of interactive dashboards. This research may inform future intervention development and shape policymaking particularly in the context of ongoing and planned developments in e-prescribing infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"7 ","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13909.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in therapeutics and healthcare have led to a growing population of individuals living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy making prescribing more challenging. Most prescribing occurs in primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) have expressed interest in comparative feedback on their prescribing performance. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and audit and feedback interventions have shown some impact, but changes are often short-lived. Interactive dashboards, a novel approach integrating CDSS and audit and feedback elements, offer longitudinal updated data outside clinical encounters. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in primary care and examine the characteristics of these dashboards.

Methods: This protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023481475) and reported in line with PRISMA-P guidelines. Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature, including trial registries were performed to identify interventional studies (randomised and non-randomised) that assess the effectiveness of interactive dashboards on prescribing related outcomes. The search will be supplemented by searching references of retrieved articles with the use of an automated citation chaser. Identified records will be screened independently by two reviewers and data from eligible studies extracted using a purposely developed data extraction tool. We will narratively summarise the intervention types and those associated with improvements in prescribing outcomes. A quantitative synthesis will be carried out if a sufficient number of homogenous studies are identified. Methodological quality will be assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care risk assessment tool.

Discussion: This systematic review will explore the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing related outcome measures in primary care and describe the characteristics of interactive dashboards. This research may inform future intervention development and shape policymaking particularly in the context of ongoing and planned developments in e-prescribing infrastructure.

优化初级保健处方的交互式仪表板的有效性:用于系统审查的协议。
导言:治疗和医疗保健的进步导致越来越多的人患有多种疾病和多种药物,这使得处方更具挑战性。大多数处方发生在初级保健和全科医生(全科医生)已经表达了对他们的处方绩效的比较反馈的兴趣。临床决策支持系统(CDSS)和审计和反馈干预显示出一些影响,但变化往往是短暂的。交互式仪表板是一种整合CDSS、审计和反馈元素的新方法,可提供临床之外的纵向更新数据。本系统综述旨在探讨交互式仪表板对初级保健处方相关结果的有效性,并检查这些仪表板的特征。方法:该方案在PROSPERO (CRD42023481475)上进行前瞻性注册,并按照PRISMA-P指南进行报告。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、PsychINFO、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和灰色文献,包括试验注册表,以确定评估交互式仪表板对处方相关结果有效性的干预性研究(随机和非随机)。搜索将通过使用自动引文追踪器搜索检索文章的参考文献来补充。确定的记录将由两名审稿人独立筛选,并使用专门开发的数据提取工具从符合条件的研究中提取数据。我们将叙述性地总结干预类型以及与处方结果改善相关的干预类型。如果确定了足够数量的同质研究,将进行定量综合。方法学质量将由两位审稿人使用Cochrane有效实践和护理组织风险评估工具进行评估。讨论:本系统综述将探讨交互式仪表板对初级保健处方相关结果测量的影响,并描述交互式仪表板的特点。这项研究可以为未来的干预发展和政策制定提供信息,特别是在电子处方基础设施正在进行和计划发展的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信