School prevention programs for problematic Internet use, problematic gambling and video game addiction in Spain: A systematic review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Víctor J Villanueva-Blasco, Dalila Eslava, Eduardo Ibor Bernalte, Manuel Isorna Folgar, Antonio Rial-Boubeta
{"title":"School prevention programs for problematic Internet use, problematic gambling and video game addiction in Spain: A systematic review.","authors":"Víctor J Villanueva-Blasco, Dalila Eslava, Eduardo Ibor Bernalte, Manuel Isorna Folgar, Antonio Rial-Boubeta","doi":"10.20882/adicciones.2045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present work aims to identify the school prevention programs for problematic Internet use, problematic gambling and video game addiction existing in Spain, reporting on their characteristics and effectiveness, establishing different degrees of recommendation. A systematic review was carried out with two complementary strategies: a) a search in the Xchange, Good Practices in Addictions (PPBB), Evidence-Based Prevention and EDDRA portals; b) a search of Web of Science, PudMed/MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Scopus or Cochrane Library. The search included the keywords \"Spain\", \"gambling\", \"videogames\", \"Internet\", \"social network\", \"school prevention\" and synonyms. Six programs were identified, of which five had empirical studies to evaluate their effectiveness. All were based on theoretical models related to the etiology of the problem, used an active and interactive methodology and were implemented by professionals with specific training. The programs ¿Qué te juegas?, Ludens and Safety.net achieved a higher degree of recommendation. For the Cubilete and PrevTec 3.1 programs, additional studies of its effectiveness are suggested. Regarding good practice portals, it is suggested that evidence be prioritized over accessibility and that the specific problem for which each program has been proven effective be clearly indicated. Based on these findings, we insist on the need to provide empirical evidence regarding any prevention strategy or program. Finally, some questions of interest are raised, such as the convenience of considering the prevention of these new problems jointly or separately.</p>","PeriodicalId":55560,"journal":{"name":"Adicciones","volume":"37 2","pages":"155-172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adicciones","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.2045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work aims to identify the school prevention programs for problematic Internet use, problematic gambling and video game addiction existing in Spain, reporting on their characteristics and effectiveness, establishing different degrees of recommendation. A systematic review was carried out with two complementary strategies: a) a search in the Xchange, Good Practices in Addictions (PPBB), Evidence-Based Prevention and EDDRA portals; b) a search of Web of Science, PudMed/MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Scopus or Cochrane Library. The search included the keywords "Spain", "gambling", "videogames", "Internet", "social network", "school prevention" and synonyms. Six programs were identified, of which five had empirical studies to evaluate their effectiveness. All were based on theoretical models related to the etiology of the problem, used an active and interactive methodology and were implemented by professionals with specific training. The programs ¿Qué te juegas?, Ludens and Safety.net achieved a higher degree of recommendation. For the Cubilete and PrevTec 3.1 programs, additional studies of its effectiveness are suggested. Regarding good practice portals, it is suggested that evidence be prioritized over accessibility and that the specific problem for which each program has been proven effective be clearly indicated. Based on these findings, we insist on the need to provide empirical evidence regarding any prevention strategy or program. Finally, some questions of interest are raised, such as the convenience of considering the prevention of these new problems jointly or separately.

西班牙学校预防网络使用问题、赌博问题和电子游戏成瘾的项目:系统回顾。
目前的工作旨在确定西班牙存在的问题网络使用,问题赌博和视频游戏成瘾的学校预防方案,报告其特点和有效性,建立不同程度的推荐。采用两种互补策略进行了系统评价:A)在交换、成瘾良好做法(PPBB)、循证预防和EDDRA门户网站中进行搜索;b)搜索Web of Science, PudMed/MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Scopus或Cochrane Library。搜索的关键词包括“西班牙”、“赌博”、“电子游戏”、“互联网”、“社交网络”、“学校预防”和同义词。确定了六个项目,其中五个项目进行了实证研究以评估其有效性。所有这些都是基于与问题病因相关的理论模型,采用积极和互动的方法,并由经过专门培训的专业人员实施。这些节目“ququest juegas”?, Ludens和safy.net获得了更高的推荐程度。对于Cubilete和PrevTec 3.1程序,建议对其有效性进行进一步研究。关于良好实践门户,建议将证据优先于可访问性,并明确指出每个程序已被证明有效的具体问题。基于这些发现,我们坚持需要提供有关任何预防策略或计划的经验证据。最后,提出了一些值得关注的问题,如联合或单独考虑这些新问题的预防是否方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adicciones
Adicciones SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Adicciones publica artículos originales sobre el tratamiento, la prevención, estudios básicos y descriptivos en el campo de las adicciones, como son las drogas ilegales, el alcohol, el tabaco o cualquier otra adicción, procedentes de distintas disciplinas (medicina, psicología, investigación básica, investigación social, etc.). Todos los artículos son seleccionados después de pasar un proceso de revisión anónimo hecho por expertos en ese tema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信