{"title":"Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Oral Tongue Cancer: Insights From the NCDB Based on Grade.","authors":"Bryan Nolasco, N Patrik Brodin, Nina Samuel, Bradley Schiff, Vikas Mehta, Madhur Garg, Rafi Kabarriti","doi":"10.1002/hed.28243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) incidence is rising in the United States. While early-stage (pT1-2N0M0) OTSCC is primarily managed with surgery, the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains debated, particularly in moderate-to-poor differentiation. Current guidelines do not recommend PORT based on histologic grade alone, yet a retrospective study by Tian et al. found PORT improved survival in moderately-to-poorly differentiated OTSCC in a Chinese cohort. We aimed to validate these findings in a US population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004-2022) identified patients with pT1-2N0M0 OTSCC treated with surgery or surgery plus PORT. After stringent inclusion criteria, 3562 patients remained, including 456 (12.8%) who received PORT. Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced key prognostic factors, and survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PORT did not improve OS in well- or moderately differentiated tumors. However, in poorly differentiated tumors, PORT was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.92, p = 0.025) before and after PSM. This effect persisted in multivariable analysis (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31-0.99, p = 0.047) and after excluding patients with lymphovascular invasion (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.87, p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings validate and extend prior international data, demonstrating a PORT-associated survival benefit in poorly differentiated early-stage OTSCC. The lack of benefit in well- and moderately differentiated tumors underscores the need for individualized treatment approaches. Prospective studies are warranted to refine risk stratification and optimize clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) incidence is rising in the United States. While early-stage (pT1-2N0M0) OTSCC is primarily managed with surgery, the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains debated, particularly in moderate-to-poor differentiation. Current guidelines do not recommend PORT based on histologic grade alone, yet a retrospective study by Tian et al. found PORT improved survival in moderately-to-poorly differentiated OTSCC in a Chinese cohort. We aimed to validate these findings in a US population.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2004-2022) identified patients with pT1-2N0M0 OTSCC treated with surgery or surgery plus PORT. After stringent inclusion criteria, 3562 patients remained, including 456 (12.8%) who received PORT. Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced key prognostic factors, and survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: PORT did not improve OS in well- or moderately differentiated tumors. However, in poorly differentiated tumors, PORT was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30-0.92, p = 0.025) before and after PSM. This effect persisted in multivariable analysis (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31-0.99, p = 0.047) and after excluding patients with lymphovascular invasion (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.87, p = 0.016).
Conclusions: These findings validate and extend prior international data, demonstrating a PORT-associated survival benefit in poorly differentiated early-stage OTSCC. The lack of benefit in well- and moderately differentiated tumors underscores the need for individualized treatment approaches. Prospective studies are warranted to refine risk stratification and optimize clinical guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.