Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to treat pain after ambulatory breast surgery: A randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brian M Ilfeld, Wendy B Abramson, Engy T Said, Jacklynn F Sztain, John J Finneran, Jonna L Griggs, Baharin Abdullah, Evan J Jensen, Adam Schaar, Anne M Wallace
{"title":"Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation to treat pain after ambulatory breast surgery: A randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study.","authors":"Brian M Ilfeld, Wendy B Abramson, Engy T Said, Jacklynn F Sztain, John J Finneran, Jonna L Griggs, Baharin Abdullah, Evan J Jensen, Adam Schaar, Anne M Wallace","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2025.2521117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation involves implanting electrodes around the ear and administering an electric current. A device is currently available that is cleared to treat symptoms from opioid withdrawal, and multiple reports suggest a possible postoperative analgesic effect. This randomized, controlled pilot study aimed to (1) assess the feasibility of a postoperative auricular neuromodulation protocol and (2) provide an estimate of its treatment effects on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults undergoing unilateral or bilateral ambulatory breast surgery with anticipated moderate-severe pain and a single-injection paravertebral nerve block(s) received an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo) following surgery. Participants were randomized to 5 days of electrical stimulation or sham in a double-masked fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first 5 days, the median pain for those receiving active stimulation (<i>n</i> = 15) was 0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 0, 0.5] versus 1.5 (IQR = 0, 3.8) for the sham group (<i>n</i> = 15, <i>P</i> = 0.084). Concurrently, the median oxycodone use for active stimulation was 0 mg (IQR = 0, 2.5) compared to 0 mg (IQR = 0, 3) for the sham group (<i>P</i> = 0.905). Various secondary outcomes reached statistical significance, including maximum and average daily pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study demonstrates that percutaneous auricular neuromodulation is a feasible approach for managing pain in ambulatory surgical procedures and shows potential as an effective analgesic following discharge. Considering its ease of application, absence of systemic side effects, and lack of significant complications, conducting a definitive clinical trial seems justified because the current study was underpowered, which possibly resulted in the lack of statistical significance for the primary outcome.<b>Registry</b>: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05521516.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"9 1","pages":"2521117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2521117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation involves implanting electrodes around the ear and administering an electric current. A device is currently available that is cleared to treat symptoms from opioid withdrawal, and multiple reports suggest a possible postoperative analgesic effect. This randomized, controlled pilot study aimed to (1) assess the feasibility of a postoperative auricular neuromodulation protocol and (2) provide an estimate of its treatment effects on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Methods: Adults undergoing unilateral or bilateral ambulatory breast surgery with anticipated moderate-severe pain and a single-injection paravertebral nerve block(s) received an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo) following surgery. Participants were randomized to 5 days of electrical stimulation or sham in a double-masked fashion.

Results: In the first 5 days, the median pain for those receiving active stimulation (n = 15) was 0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 0, 0.5] versus 1.5 (IQR = 0, 3.8) for the sham group (n = 15, P = 0.084). Concurrently, the median oxycodone use for active stimulation was 0 mg (IQR = 0, 2.5) compared to 0 mg (IQR = 0, 3) for the sham group (P = 0.905). Various secondary outcomes reached statistical significance, including maximum and average daily pain scores.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that percutaneous auricular neuromodulation is a feasible approach for managing pain in ambulatory surgical procedures and shows potential as an effective analgesic following discharge. Considering its ease of application, absence of systemic side effects, and lack of significant complications, conducting a definitive clinical trial seems justified because the current study was underpowered, which possibly resulted in the lack of statistical significance for the primary outcome.Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05521516.

经皮耳神经调节治疗门诊乳房手术后疼痛:一项随机、双盲、假对照的初步研究。
导读:经皮耳神经调节包括在耳周围植入电极并施加电流。目前有一种装置可用于治疗阿片类药物戒断症状,多份报告表明可能具有术后镇痛作用。这项随机、对照的先导研究旨在(1)评估术后耳廓神经调节方案的可行性,(2)评估其对术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的治疗效果。方法:接受单侧或双侧门诊乳房手术的成年人,预期中-重度疼痛和单次注射椎旁神经阻滞,术后接受耳穴神经调节装置(NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo)。参与者被随机分为5天的电刺激或假手术。结果:前5天,主动刺激组(n = 15)的中位疼痛为0(四分位间距[IQR] = 0,0.5),假手术组(n = 15, P = 0.084)的中位疼痛为1.5 (IQR = 0,3.8)。同时,主动刺激中位羟考酮用量为0 mg (IQR = 0,2.5),而假手术组为0 mg (IQR = 0,3) (P = 0.905)。各种次要结局均有统计学意义,包括最大和平均每日疼痛评分。结论:这项初步研究表明,经皮耳神经调节是一种可行的方法来管理门诊手术过程中的疼痛,并显示出潜在的有效镇痛出院后。考虑到其易于应用,无系统性副作用,无显著并发症,进行明确的临床试验似乎是合理的,因为目前的研究力度不足,这可能导致主要结果缺乏统计学意义。注册:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05521516。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信