Comparison of opioid use among long-term care residents in Ontario and Alberta, Canada: A multi-jurisdictional, repeated cross-sectional study.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Colleen J Maxwell, Michael A Campitelli, Andrea Gruneir, Andrea Iaboni, Laura C Maclagan, David B Hogan, Erik Youngson, Xueyi Chen, Zhiyin Li, Susan E Bronskill
{"title":"Comparison of opioid use among long-term care residents in Ontario and Alberta, Canada: A multi-jurisdictional, repeated cross-sectional study.","authors":"Colleen J Maxwell, Michael A Campitelli, Andrea Gruneir, Andrea Iaboni, Laura C Maclagan, David B Hogan, Erik Youngson, Xueyi Chen, Zhiyin Li, Susan E Bronskill","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2025.2518151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exploring regional variation in opioid use for pain among long-term care (LTC) residents may help identify modifiable factors associated with suboptimal prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to compare recent trends in prevalent opioid use and higher risk prescribing among LTC residents in Ontario and Alberta, and to examine variation in opioid trends across resident subgroups within each province.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing comparable linked clinical and health administrative databases for LTC residents (aged >65) in each province, we examined trends in monthly use of any opioid, specific drug types and formulations, high daily doses (≥90 Morphine Equivalents), and concurrent use with a benzodiazepine or gabapentinoid. Prevalence ratios comparing change in opioid measures, overall and across resident subgroups, from the first (March 2015) to last study (March 2022) months were estimated using age-sex adjusted log-binomial regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opioid prevalence (any, select types, long-acting formulations, high daily doses) was consistently higher among Ontario residents whereas concurrent use with a benzodiazepine or gabapentinoid was higher among Alberta residents. Overall use remained stable in Ontario but increased by 23% in Alberta LTC. In both provinces, there were significant decreases in higher risk opioid prescribing over time, including concurrent use with benzodiazepines, but also significant increases in the concurrent use with gabapentinoids and tramadol use (Alberta only).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although both provinces showed trends toward more appropriate opioid use in LTC, the factors driving observed provincial differences in opioid prescribing and the rise in concurrent opioid and gabapentinoid use among residents, warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"9 1","pages":"2518151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2518151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exploring regional variation in opioid use for pain among long-term care (LTC) residents may help identify modifiable factors associated with suboptimal prescribing practices.

Aims: We aimed to compare recent trends in prevalent opioid use and higher risk prescribing among LTC residents in Ontario and Alberta, and to examine variation in opioid trends across resident subgroups within each province.

Methods: Utilizing comparable linked clinical and health administrative databases for LTC residents (aged >65) in each province, we examined trends in monthly use of any opioid, specific drug types and formulations, high daily doses (≥90 Morphine Equivalents), and concurrent use with a benzodiazepine or gabapentinoid. Prevalence ratios comparing change in opioid measures, overall and across resident subgroups, from the first (March 2015) to last study (March 2022) months were estimated using age-sex adjusted log-binomial regression models.

Results: Opioid prevalence (any, select types, long-acting formulations, high daily doses) was consistently higher among Ontario residents whereas concurrent use with a benzodiazepine or gabapentinoid was higher among Alberta residents. Overall use remained stable in Ontario but increased by 23% in Alberta LTC. In both provinces, there were significant decreases in higher risk opioid prescribing over time, including concurrent use with benzodiazepines, but also significant increases in the concurrent use with gabapentinoids and tramadol use (Alberta only).

Conclusions: Although both provinces showed trends toward more appropriate opioid use in LTC, the factors driving observed provincial differences in opioid prescribing and the rise in concurrent opioid and gabapentinoid use among residents, warrant further investigation.

加拿大安大略省和阿尔伯塔省长期护理居民中阿片类药物使用的比较:一项多司法管辖区的重复横断面研究。
背景:探索长期护理(LTC)居民阿片类药物用于疼痛的区域差异可能有助于确定与次优处方实践相关的可修改因素。目的:我们旨在比较安大略省和阿尔伯塔省LTC居民中普遍使用阿片类药物和高风险处方的最新趋势,并检查每个省居民亚组中阿片类药物趋势的变化。方法:利用各省LTC居民(年龄在65岁至65岁之间)的可比临床和卫生管理数据库,我们检查了每月使用任何阿片类药物、特定药物类型和配方、高日剂量(≥90吗啡当量)以及同时使用苯二氮卓类药物或加巴喷丁类药物的趋势。从第一个月(2015年3月)到最后一个研究月(2022年3月),使用年龄-性别调整的对数二项回归模型估计了总体和跨居民亚组阿片类药物测量变化的患病率。结果:阿片类药物患病率(任何,选择类型,长效制剂,高日剂量)在安大略省居民中一直较高,而同时使用苯二氮卓类药物或加巴喷丁类药物在阿尔伯塔省居民中较高。安大略省的总体使用量保持稳定,但阿尔伯塔省LTC的使用量增加了23%。在这两个省,随着时间的推移,高风险的阿片类药物处方显著减少,包括同时使用苯二氮卓类药物,但同时使用加巴喷丁类药物和曲马多的情况也显著增加(仅艾伯塔省)。结论:尽管两省在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中都表现出更合理使用阿片类药物的趋势,但导致阿片类药物处方和居民中阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物同时使用增加的因素存在差异,值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信