Dietary diversity as a modifier of the effect of supplementation with multiple micronutrients during pregnancy on low birth weight in a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh
Mary de Boer , Andrew L Thorne-Lyman , Abu Ahmed Shamim , Lee S-F Wu , Saijuddin Shaikh , Hasmot Ali , Keith P West , Parul Christian
{"title":"Dietary diversity as a modifier of the effect of supplementation with multiple micronutrients during pregnancy on low birth weight in a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh","authors":"Mary de Boer , Andrew L Thorne-Lyman , Abu Ahmed Shamim , Lee S-F Wu , Saijuddin Shaikh , Hasmot Ali , Keith P West , Parul Christian","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Meta-analysis of trials of multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) compared with iron-folic acid (IFA) suggests an overall benefit of 12% on low birth weight (LBW).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Building on prior work showing that MMS is more effective in anemic and higher body mass index females; this paper explores whether dietary quality modifies the effect of MMS on birth weight.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 7-day food frequency questionnaire was administered in late pregnancy to 19,160 pregnant participants in the JiVitA-3 cluster-randomized controlled trial of MMS compared with IFA supplementation in Bangladesh. A 10-item dietary diversity score (DDS) was created by summing the number of food groups consumed ≥4 times per week. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of MMS compared with IFA on LBW were estimated by DDS. The interaction between DDS and MMS was tested using a generalized estimating equations log-binomial regression model to account for the cluster randomization. Point estimates and 95% CI for the effect of MMS on LBW were estimated at each DDS. Models were adjusted for confounders. We used <em>P <</em> 0.1 to determine the statistical significance of the interaction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median DDS was 3 (interquartile range: 2, 4), and 18.6% of pregnant women had a score ≥ 5. The fully adjusted protective effect of MMS on LBW was inversely associated with dietary diversity [MMS×DDS RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.04), <em>P</em>-interaction = 0.05]. The effect was greatest at the lowest DDS [DDS= 1, RR LBW: 0.86 (0.81, 0.91)] and decreased at higher scores [DDS = 7, RR: 0.92 (0.84, 1.00)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In rural Bangladesh, where maternal dietary diversity was generally low, MMS (compared with IFA) supplementation had the strongest effect on reducing low birth weight among pregnant females with the least diverse diet, possibly reflecting the additional benefit of supplementation in this vulnerable group.</div><div>This trial was registered at <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> as NCT00860470.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"122 3","pages":"Pages 762-769"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291652500396X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Meta-analysis of trials of multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) compared with iron-folic acid (IFA) suggests an overall benefit of 12% on low birth weight (LBW).
Objectives
Building on prior work showing that MMS is more effective in anemic and higher body mass index females; this paper explores whether dietary quality modifies the effect of MMS on birth weight.
Methods
A 7-day food frequency questionnaire was administered in late pregnancy to 19,160 pregnant participants in the JiVitA-3 cluster-randomized controlled trial of MMS compared with IFA supplementation in Bangladesh. A 10-item dietary diversity score (DDS) was created by summing the number of food groups consumed ≥4 times per week. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of MMS compared with IFA on LBW were estimated by DDS. The interaction between DDS and MMS was tested using a generalized estimating equations log-binomial regression model to account for the cluster randomization. Point estimates and 95% CI for the effect of MMS on LBW were estimated at each DDS. Models were adjusted for confounders. We used P < 0.1 to determine the statistical significance of the interaction.
Results
The median DDS was 3 (interquartile range: 2, 4), and 18.6% of pregnant women had a score ≥ 5. The fully adjusted protective effect of MMS on LBW was inversely associated with dietary diversity [MMS×DDS RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.04), P-interaction = 0.05]. The effect was greatest at the lowest DDS [DDS= 1, RR LBW: 0.86 (0.81, 0.91)] and decreased at higher scores [DDS = 7, RR: 0.92 (0.84, 1.00)].
Conclusions
In rural Bangladesh, where maternal dietary diversity was generally low, MMS (compared with IFA) supplementation had the strongest effect on reducing low birth weight among pregnant females with the least diverse diet, possibly reflecting the additional benefit of supplementation in this vulnerable group.
This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00860470.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism.
Purpose:
The purpose of AJCN is to:
Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition.
Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits.
Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition.
Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches.
Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles.
Peer Review Process:
All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.